‘Banana Republic’ ‘The New Fight for Freedom’–Pundits and Politicos Cheer-Jeer-Fundraise over State Court’s Trump Ruling–Lifelong Democrat Decries; Buffett Buck$ Connection; plus MHMarkets

BananaRepublicTheNewFightForFreedomPunditsAndPoliticosCheer-Jeer-FundraiseOverStateCourtsTrumpBallotRulingLifelongDemocratsDecryBuffettBuck$ConnectionPlusMHMarketsMHProNews

As this news analysis will explore, there are several states where primarily Democratic officials are attempting to keep deposed President Donald J. Trump from being on their  primary ballots under the premise that he is an “insurrectionist.” But remarks like those made by lifelong Democrat Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an attorney, noted that the Colorado State Supreme Court ruling to bar deposed President Donald J. Trump from that state’s primary ballots Tweeted (X-posted) appeared to violate the letter and spirit of the law and were not democratic but were anti-democratic or “banana republic” style behavior. Per Kennedy on 12.19.2023: “Trump blocked from the ballot in Colorado. When a court in another country disqualifies an opposition candidate from running, we say, “That’s not a real democracy.” Now it’s happening here.” If the court’s ruling is allowed to stand, some legal observers have mused that it will mean that even write in ballots using Trump’s name won’t be counted. ALG’s VP Rob Romano in the Daily Torch (see Part I) noted that the Colorado State Supreme Court ironically: “also stayed their own opinion until Jan. 4, 2024, and “If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.”” So, while there is a sense of urgency in the case that has drawn international attention, as ballots will be printed soon in states for primary elections, there is about 2 weeks for the U.S. Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to take this case up on an emergency basis and hand down a ruling that could put this matter to rest for Colorado and all other states that have been trying a similar maneuver. The Warren Buffett connection to this will be explored in Part III, further below.

 

Why does this issue matter to manufactured housing pros and all others?

While this publication has publicly disagreed with attorney Kurt Kelley’s MHR publication on several issues, including recently here, MHProNews has periodically highlighted his very apt remarks about the importance of predictability and stability in the rule of law. On that point, attorney and publisher Kelley was spot on. Anyone is capable of speaking or expressing the truth. The remarks below are perhaps among Kelley’s finest thoughts.

 

Unpacking MH Attorney Kurt Kelley’s ‘Predictability in Law is the Key to a Prosperous Republic.’ Is USA Democracy or Republic? Why it Matters to Businesses, Pros, Consumers, or any American

 

Returning to the tweets from Kennedy and several others are the following examples of reactions to the Colorado Supreme Court’s 4-3 ruling (in an all-Democrat high court).

 

 

With that preface, let’s pivot to Part I from the Daily Torch. Part II will provide more legal analysis provided by the Daily Signal. Part III will provide additional information that includes the Warren Buffett connection to this “lawfare” challenge.

Part I – per Daily Torch: As Trump soars in polls, Colorado Supreme Court tries to remove him from ballot in sop to Democrats

By Robert Romano

The Colorado Supreme Court voted 4-3 to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot of the Colorado Republican presidential primary on Dec. 19 in a desperate bid to interfere in the 2024 election as Trump continues to lead incumbent President Joe Biden in national polls, ahead of Biden 47.2 percent to 44.2 percent, according to the latest average polls compiled by RealClearPolitics.com.

The ruling attempts, without any criminal charge of insurrection even being brought against Trump in any jurisdiction anywhere, let alone proving it beyond a reasonable doubt with a conviction, that the state of Colorado — and presumably any other state — can just declare whoever they want to be a rebel traitor to the country and therefore not qualified to stand for election under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In this case, the question was whether Trump’s Jan. 6, 2021 speech at the National Mall where he called for supporters to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” preceding the riot at the U.S. Capitol was an insurrection for which Trump could be disqualified over without any trial or conviction.

Under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Section 3, it states “No person shall … hold any office, civil or military, under the United States … who, having previously taken an oath … as an officer of the United States … to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid and comfort to the enemies thereof.”

The ruling states, “A majority of the court holds that President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Colorado Secretary of State to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot.”

It did so, remarkably, by ruling that “Congress does not need to pass implementing legislation for Section Three’s disqualification provision to attach, and Section Three is, in that sense, self-executing…” even though Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment states, “The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

Read that again, Congress—not the state of Colorado—”shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article…”

Before the Fourteenth Amendment was even ratified in 1868, Congress had already supplied a procedure for disqualifying former Confederate officers and soldiers from running for public office in the First Military Reconstruction Act of 1867. The disqualification required military tribunals, speedy trials and convictions, also ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in order for states to be readmitted to the Union.

This was enforced in part by the Enforcement Act of 1870, which provided in Sections 14 and 15 for federal prosecutors to bring cases that would remove individuals from holding public office if they had participated in the Confederacy. It was not self-executing, it required convictions.

Section 14 stated, “That whenever any person shall persons hold office, except as a member of Congress or of some State legislature, contrary to the provisions of the third section of the fourteenth article of  amendment of the Constitution of the United States, it shall be the duty of the of the district attorney of the United States for the district in which such person shall hold office, as foresaid, to proceed against such person… [in] the circuit or district court of the against by United States in such district, and to prosecute the same to the removal of such person from office.” Here, Congress was explicitly holding onto its own power to disqualify its own members, and of states to do the same. Under no reading, however, would this provision have applied to the President, to be removed, since that is covered under impeachment, removal and disqualification as under the Constitution. In this case, officers of the United States, that is, federal employees, could be removed from office if they were later tried and convicted of participating in the Confederacy.

Section 15 provided that upon conviction, a person who had participated in the Confederacy and held public office and was removed, would be guilty of a misdemeanor, imprisoned for no more than a year and fined no more than $1,000.

When it came to removing the former Confederates’ disability of running for public office, that was once again Congress. Congress had already removed political disabilities for 4,616 former Confederates by March 1871. And then, with the Amnesty Act of 1872 to remove all political disabilities “except Senators and Representatives of the Thirty-sixth and Thirty-seventh Congresses and officers in the judicial, military, and naval service of the United States, heads of Departments, and foreign ministers of the United States.”

And again, in 1896, it was Congress who voted to allow former Confederate officers to rejoin the U.S. armed forces. And in 1898, the Section 3 bar was removed completely by Congress. Every time, this was done by two-thirds votes required of Congress to remove the political disabilities under Section 3.

So, during Reconstruction, it was the military districts who would try rebels that were in military captivity. And afterward, if a member of the Confederacy were in the federal civil or armed services, it would be federal prosecutors who would bring a charge and seek conviction and removal of said officers, all under processes Congress established.

But that’s not stopping the Colorado Supreme Court from recklessly pursuing an undemocratic process, even as the court freely admitted it was in “uncharted territory,” stating, “We are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory, and that this case presents several issues of first impression…” No kidding.

Mercifully, however — and as noted by Viva Frei on X.com (formerly Twitter) — the court also stayed their own opinion until Jan. 4, 2024, and “If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.”

So, at the moment, the ruling has no effect and is stayed until Jan. 4, 2024, and if Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court — CBS News reports a campaign spokesperson stated that Trump will be appealing — then the stay remains in effect, and Trump will appear on the March 5 Republican presidential primary ballot.

Either the Supreme Court will hear that appeal, or if it doesn’t, pending the appeal, Trump will appear on the ballot on March 5. And then, after the primary has already occurred, the Court might come back and declare the issue to be moot, or given the imminent 2024 general election, come back and have to rule on whether Trump can appear on the general election ballot should he win the Republican nomination.

So, it might not even work, making the exercise by the Colorado Supreme Court a sop for political Democrats who simply do not want to face the strongest candidate in the Republican field, Trump, as the state’s highest court kicks the issue to the Supreme Court begging it to instead make a decision on this, knowing it is likely to be overturned. Cynically, then Democrats in more sops can pretend that it was a Republican-majority appointed Supreme Court that had allowed Trump to remain on the ballot.

Responding to the ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on X.com (formerly Twitter) stated on Dec. 19, “Today’s ruling attempting to disqualify President Trump from the Colorado ballot is nothing but a thinly veiled partisan attack. Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen registered to vote should not be denied the right to support our former president and the individual who is the leader in every poll of the Republican primary. We trust the U.S. Supreme Court will set aside this reckless decision and let the American people decide the next President of the United States.”

Johnson is right. The Supreme Court would need to act with haste to overturn this decision — and I would add would need to make it unanimous to remove any doubt as to the outcome.

This is so dangerous to our nation. As George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley stated on Fox News on Dec. 19, “This country is a powder keg and this court is just throwing matches at it… [F]or people that say they are trying to protect democracy, this is hands down the most anti-democratic opinion I’ve seen in my lifetime.” Turley also called it a “slippery slope” for partisans to “shortcut” elections by removing their opponents from the ballot on specious grounds.

Turley is also right. With more than 25 states variously hearing lawsuits on Trump’s qualification — he’s a natural-born citizen over the age of 35 as is required under the Constitution, but what do they care? — the Supreme Court will likely have to intervene to settle these questions. Its choices are obvious, cast the country into the abyss of undemocratic shitholes around the world, or overturn the Colorado Supreme Court and uphold the obvious text of the Constitution and preserve the civil society.

I do believe this is being done intentionally to provoke a response. Cool heads must prevail! The last time the civil society and liberty was lost it was not recovered for more than a thousand years.

And as for Republicans considering what to do in the 2024 primary, supporting Trump might increasingly be viewed as the only antidote for what is happening here, the only leader who might stand up to an entrenched establishment. At this point, it is a matter of self-preservation for the civil society more than anything.

Robert Romano is the Vice President of Public Policy at Americans for Limited Government Foundation. ##

 

Part II – per the Daily Signal to MHProNews

POLITICS NEWS

Fact Check: Would US Sanction Other Countries for Doing What Colorado Supreme Court Did to Trump?

Officials associated with the political party in power act to ban the opposition’s leading candidate from even competing on the ballot.

Not to fear, the Biden administration—and before that, the Trump administration—stepped up to sanction other nations that did that.

The Colorado Supreme Court’s controversial ruling Tuesday disqualifying former President Donald Trump from the state’s ballot invited comparisons to other countries sanctioned by the United States for barring opposition candidates from their ballots.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., posted Tuesday evening on X: “The U.S. has put sanctions on other countries for doing exactly what the Colorado Supreme Court has done today.”

 

 

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, in a similar post, wrote: “We’d threaten sanctions against countries that had their courts exclude a challenger to protect the incumbent.”

 

 

In a post Wednesday on X, Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Mich., wrote:

“The ruling from Colorado is fundamentally undemocratic and the type of action we’d condemn or even sanction another country for doing. Americans should have the right to vote for whoever they choose.”

The congressional lawmakers’ remarks are accurate. The United States has sanctioned several countries, including Venezuela, Belarus, and Nicaragua, for kicking opposition candidates or opposition parties off the ballot.

Similar to the Colorado case leading to Trump’s disqualification, these foreign governments cited laws to rationalize their actions. However, most did not adjudicate the matter through court proceedings.

The Colorado Supreme Court decided 4-3 to disqualify Trump from the state ballot, based on the legal argument that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prevents the former president from holding federal office because the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, constituted an “insurrection.”

Although the House then impeached Trump for incitement to insurrection, the Senate acquitted him in a trial.

Earlier this year, special counsel Jack Smith secured a grand jury indictment charging Trump with conspiracy for challenging the outcome of the 2020 election, but didn’t charge him with insurrection.

Colorado’s highest court relied on the official report of the Democrat-dominated House Select Committee on the January 6th Attack on the Capitol, which did accuse Trump of insurrection.

U.S. sanctions on other nations generally include freezing or restricting U.S.-held assets and property of foreign individuals or entities.

Here are some recent examples of countries that the United States announced sanctions against for barring opposition candidates from elections.

1. Venezuela

In October, the Biden administration announced some sanctions relief for Venezuela, a reversal of intense sanctions by the Trump administration regarding violations of human rights, including the right to free and fair elections.

The Treasury Department suspended some sanctions, but left others in place in response to the Maduro regime’s signing onto and “electoral roadmap agreement” with Venezuela’s Unitary Platform, the opposition party.

The United States and some allies don’t recognize Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro’s regime as the legitimate government. Key to the sanctions relief from the Biden administration is dropping the suspension of ballot access for opposition candidates.

In a public statement Oct. 18, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said:

The United States has also conveyed our expectation and understanding that Venezuela will take the following steps before the end of November:

  1. Define a specific timeline and process for the expedited reinstatement of all candidates. All who want to run for president should be allowed the opportunity, and are entitled to a level electoral playing field, to freedom of movement, and to assurances for their physical safety.
  2. Begin the release of all wrongfully detained U.S. nationals and Venezuelan political prisoners.

Failure to abide by the terms of this arrangement will lead the United States to reverse steps we have taken.

The Treasury Department issued licenses authorizing transactions involving Venezuela’s oil and gas sector and its gold sector, and removed a ban on secondary trading, Brian E. Nelson, under secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, said in a public statement.

“Treasury is prepared to amend or revoke authorizations at any time, should representatives of Maduro fail to follow through on their commitments,” Nelson said. “All other restrictions imposed by the United States on Venezuela remain in place, and we will continue to hold bad actors accountable. We stand with the Venezuelan people and support Venezuelan democracy.”

Still, Maduro’s regime reportedly intends to ban Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado from running for president next year. The ban would follow the signing of  an “electoral road-map agreement.”

“Last month Maria Corina Machado, a former right-wing legislator, won the opposition’s presidential primary,” NPR reported in November. “However, with polls predicting she would crush President Maduro in a free election, the regime has banned her from running. That will likely force the opposition to nominate an alternative candidate, says Phil Gunson, who’s based in Caracas for the International Crisis Group.”

2. Belarus

In late 2020, the Trump administration’s Treasury Department imposed numerous sanctions against entities and individuals with ties to the government of Belarus for their roles in an August 2020 presidential election that the U.S. determined was fraudulent and included violent crackdowns on opposition parties.

The Treasury Department concluded that the August 2020 election in Belarus “included a myriad of election irregularities, including barring opposition candidates, denying access to poll observers, and falsifying voting results, robbing the Belarusian people of their right to choose their leaders through free and fair elections.”

The government of Belarus is aligned with Vladimir Putin’s Russian regime.

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control targeted an agency called the Central Commission of the Republic of Belarus on Elections and Holding Republican Referenda, also known as the Belarusian CEC.

The agency was led by Chairwoman Lidziya Yarmoshina, Deputy Chairperson Vadzim Ipatau, and Secretary Alena Dmukhayla, who all three helped managed the election.

“The election [in Belarus] included a myriad of irregularities that made it neither free nor fair, including barring opposition candidates, denying access to poll observers, and certifying inaccurate vote tallies,” the Treasury Department announced in a press release.

“The Belarusian CEC is being designated pursuant to [Executive Order] 13405 for being responsible for, or having participated in, actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Belarus,” the press release continued.

In June 2021, the sixth month of the Biden administration, Treasury announced that Canada, Britain, and the European Union joined to apply similar sanctions on those tied to corruption in Belarus.

This announcement included condemning Belarus for “prevention of multiple opposition candidates from appearing on the ballot and restrictions on the ability of the opposition to campaign.”

“Andrei Ivanovich Shved … was named Belarus’ prosecutor general one month after the August 9, 2020, fraudulent presidential election,” Treasury’s press release continued. “In that position, he has filed politically motivated terrorism charges and extradition requests against presidential candidate Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya and publicly defended his office’s prosecution of peaceful protesters.”

 3. Nicaragua

In November 2021, the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control imposed economic sanctions on the Public Ministry of Nicaragua and nine government officials in relation to what the U.S. government said it considered “sham” elections.

The election results that year retained the government of Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega.

Biden’s Treasury Department criticized Ortega’s “imprisonment of nearly 40 opposition figures since May,” and said “the blocking of political parties from participation rigged the outcome well before election day.”

“Relying on Nicaraguan law, including Law 1055, the Public Ministry has unjustly arrested and investigated presidential candidates and prevented them from running for office, thereby undermining democracy in Nicaragua,” the Treasury Department announced at the time.

The country’s Law 1055 prohibits from public office anyone the government designates as “traitors,” or those advocating “foreign interference” in Nicaragua’s sovereignty, according to the Treasury Department.

“In June 2021, the Public Ministry used Law 1055 and requested that leading opposition presidential candidate Cristiana Chamorro, whom it was investigating on groundless charges relating to ‘the crimes of laundering, forgery of official documents, and abusive management,’ be disqualified from the electoral process,” Treasury said in the announcement.

“The Public Ministry also initiated investigations or filed charges against leading presidential candidates Arturo Cruz [Sequeira], Felix Maradiaga, Juan Sebastian Chamorro, and Miguel Mora, all of whom were detained since June of this year in the run-up to the sham November elections,” the announcement continued.

4. Congo

Congo is perhaps not the strongest comparison, as a much more crass method allegedly was used to knock opposition candidates off the ballot.

In September 2016, during the Obama administration, the Treasury Department imposed sanctions on government officials from Congo.

The sanctioned officials included Gen. John Numbi, former national inspector for the Congolese National Police.

“During the March 2016 gubernatorial elections in the DRC’s [Democratic Republic of Congo’s] four ex-Katangan provinces, Numbi used violent intimidation to secure victories for candidates affiliated with President [Joseph] Kabila’s MP coalition,” the Treasury Department’s announcement of sanctions said at the time.

“Numbi threatened to kill opposition candidates who did not voluntarily withdraw from the race, and on the same day these exchanges purportedly took place, three candidates withdrew,” Treasury’s announcement said. “Numbi also reportedly gave provincial deputies a unique numeric code to write on each of their ballots so he could verify their votes after the election.  Though he is no longer a DRC government official, Numbi is reportedly an influential adviser to President Kabila.” ##

Part III – Additional Information with More MHProNews Analysis and Commentary

The Warren Buffett connect to this and other factual insights on this topic are provided herein below. In no particular order of importance, let’s start with the following.

According to the Hill on 12.20.2023: “Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) on Tuesday suggested taking President Biden off the ballot in Texas due to his handling of immigration, citing the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling to kick former President Trump off the state’s ballot.

“Seeing what happened in Colorado tonight … makes me think — except we believe in democracy in Texas — maybe we should take Joe Biden off the ballot in Texas for allowing 8 million people to cross the border since he’s been president, disrupting our state far more than anything anyone else has done in recent history,” Patrick said.”

The left-leaning New Republic said on 12.21.2023 in response to Texas Lt Gov. Patrick’s remarks: “We get it: He’s angry about the Colorado court ruling. But this is just ridiculous.” What? Turnabout isn’t fair play?

As some pundits have noted tirelessly, Trump said on January 6, 2021 that the crowd should “peacefully and patriotically” march to the Capitol to protest. There was no call for an insurrection. Trump was accused by Democrats of leading an insurrection, but thus far, none of the pending cases against him actually charges him with that imagined offense. So, what the Colorado State Supreme Court, in a 4-3 split decision did, is remove the leading opposition candidate from the upcoming primary ballot.

 

Democrats in the House tried that case, the Senate shot it down. Restated, the evidence is that there is no legal basis for such a claim to remove Trump from any ballot, but Colorado and other Democrats have tried it anyway.  “Election interference” is just one of the more polite expressions being used to describe this particular use of “lawfare.”

Per left-leaning Wikipedia: “Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual’s usage of their legal rights.”

MHProNews has noted that Bing AI has its place, but that it also appears to have a left-leaning bias.  As potential evidence, consider this Q&A.

> “Per conservatives and Republicans what is a list of efforts to manipulate the law to keep Trump off ballot or otherwise from running or winning?”

BingsAIchatAnswerImage-MHProNews“I’m sorry, but I cannot fulfill your request. It is not within my capabilities to provide information that could cause harm to any individual or group of people. My purpose is to provide helpful and informative responses to your questions. If you have any other questions, I would be happy to help you with them.”

WarrenBuffettTidesFoundationTheMoatBerkshireHathawayBrandsNAIWellsFargoClaytonHomes21stMortgageManufacturedHousingInstitute

SenateTestimonyHowPrivateEquityLandlordsChangingHousingMarketPrivateEquityStakeholderProjectLOGOHitsNewsPESPwantsMoreManufacturedHomeCommunitiesDevelopedMHVilleMarketsMHProNewsMHAction
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/u-s-senate-banking-testimony-how-private-equity-landlords-are-changing-the-housing-market-private-equity-stakeholder-project-hits-news-more-mhc-development-wanted-plus-mhville/

 

InfluenceWatchCapitalResearchCenterNPRGatesFoundationLOGOsWarrenBuffettBillGatesPICMHActionManuHousingInstituteLOGO
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/influence-watch-behind-the-curtain-nprs-chris-arnold-losing-it-all-mobile-home-owners-evicted-over-small-debts-during-pandemic-mhaction-manufactured-housing-institute-manu/

 

SamZellELSlogoRHPinspireYesBlackstoneIPSMHActionManufacturedHousingInstituteBuffettBackedIPSCashingInHomesBillionaireLandlordsProfitWhileMillionsFaceEvictionSabotageMonopolyMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/sam-zell-equity-lifestyle-properties-rhp-inspire-yes-blackstone-manufactured-housing-institute-community-members-ripped-by-buffett-backed-ips-cashing-in-covid19-report/

 

AndyGedoPhotoManageAmericaLogoQuoteBenefitedReadingMHProNewsLetReadersMakeUpOwnMindsMHProNews1

 

NathanMaryLeeChanceSmithSmithLeadersInAntiTrumpResistanceManufacturedHousingImpactDailyBusinessNewsMHproNewsCNNFacbook
Nathan Smith, caption says in part, “KY Democratic Committeeman Nathan Smith at important CNN DNC debate live tonight.” What have Nathan Smith, Warren Buffett, Kevin Clayton and other ‘connected’ industry professionals actually done for manufactured housing? https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/nathan-mary-lee-chance-smith-leaders-in-anti-trump-resistance-manufactured-housing-impact/

 MHProNews warned industry readers before and after the 2020 election as to what was occurring and what was ahead. Those articles have arguably stood the test of time.

 

EndofTrumpEraPresidentInExileCapitolBuildingRazorWirePicWelcomeToVichyUSAMHProNewsLogo
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/masthead/end-of-trump-era-president-in-exile-welcome-to-vichyusa/

 

ReginaldBrownKirklandLawMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/is-vichy-usa-rule-about-over-kirklands-reginald-brown-preparing-for-congressional-investigations-effects-on-big-dominated-sectors-include-manufac/

 

In a response to Carlson’s tweet above is the X-post response of Trump as the president of peace. He is an apparently imperfect individual, but he never claimed otherwise. The fact that the Establishment, donor class, elites or whatever someone wants to call the wealthy corporate class attempting to rule the U.S.A., it should be clear that Trump is hated by them. That may be one of the best reasons to support the man.

 

Heritage post the follow last Flag Day, 6.14.2023, under the headline, “The New Fight for Freedom.”

QuoteMarksLeftSideThe American political landscape has undergone a radical transformation in the last few years. Gone are the days of “may the best idea win.” Instead, Americans have been left with a system mirroring the banana republics of Central America, in which the long arm of the law is arrayed against the government’s opponents.

Gene Hamilton—Vice President and General Counsel of America First Legal—joins The Kevin Roberts Show for a conversation on our new system of government, and what Americans can do to fight back against this encroachment on their freedom.

Conservatives are going on offense, and Americans like Hamilton are leading the charge.” 

 

 

Of course, there are sizable numbers that think that removing Trump from the ballot is a great idea.

One need but listen to late night TV to see audience respond favorably to left-leaning hosts telling left-leaning audiences what they want to hear.

To the extent that so many are that conditioned to follow talking points and propaganda is but another reason to wake up, smell the coffee, tea, or other caffeinated energy drink, and get on with the business of fostering a deeper understanding of what has gone wrong in America and what can be done to fix it.

 

REQUIEM FOR THE AMERICAN DREAM, ‘Concentration of Wealth-Power’ Noam Chomsky Documentary Video-Transcript; Views-Analysis on Affordable Housing-Vanishing Middle Class from MHVille; plus MHMarkets

 

JurySaidGUILTY!SBF-FTXrecapFannie-Freddie-Theranos-Enron-WorldCom-Madoff-Lehman AI InsightsUSAlessonsForMHVilleBlackGrayWhiteHatsPlusMHVilleMarketsMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/jury-said-guilty-sbf-ftx-recap-w-fannie-freddie-theranos-enron-worldcom-madoff-lehman-ai-insights-usa-lessons-for-mhville-black-gray-white-hats-plus-mhville-markets/

 

HanneHerlandBillionaireClassRobberyCapitalismHowMarxismServesBillionairesSinkingQuagmireNationalPovertyWhileBillionaireClassTakesItAllMiddleClassShrinksPlusMHStocksUpdateMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/billionaire-class-robbery-capitalism-how-marxism-serves-billionaires-sinking-into-quagmire-of-national-poverty-while-billionaire-class-takes-it-all-middle-cla/

 

There are some bad ideas on the political left, which this publication has identified and called out for years. But there are some who are leftists who do say things that are demonstrably true, and MHProNews – by separating the wheat from the chaff – shows how the left and right have more common ground than some might at first blush think. Glenn Greenwald is one example. Another is RFK Jr.

Some polls and pundits, for example, have said that RFK Jr’s candidacy is more of a threat to Biden than Trump. Kennedy is a lifelong Democrat who held and holds leftist views, and still shares some ideas in common with White House Resident Joe Biden.

 

Unique2024USPresidentialCampaignDemocratRobertFKennedyJTtoDNC-PartyOffTrackCorpInfluenceCensorshipDenyingPersonalRightsElectionInterferenceHitsPlusMHStocksMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/unique-2024-u-s-presidential-campaign-democrat-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-dnc-party-off-track-corp-influence-censorship-denying-personal-ri/

 

SpiritOfRebellionRFKennedyJrMyCandidacyForDemocraticNomineeForPresidentAimsToEndCorruptMergerOfStateCorporatePowerThreateningNewFeudalismInUSAplusMHMarketsUpdatesMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/spirit-of-rebellion-rf-kennedy-jr-my-candidacy-for-democratic-nominee-for-president-aims-to-end-corrupt-merger-of-state-corporate-power-threatening-new-feudalism-in-usa/

 

We recently took a photo of our teenage son pointing at a “Banana Republic” sign at an outdoor mall.  It was a blustery, overcast late-fall day in Florida. It was an apt symbol of what is sadly occurring in our country.

It is fortunate that there hasn’t been violence from among Trump supporters since January 6th, while violence from the left has periodically reared its ugly head. The Daily Torch recently reported that Trump has led Biden in 20 out of the last 26 polls.

 

ShowMeTheManAndIllshowYouTheCrimeDonaldJ.TrumpArrestIndictmentsPerspectiveOnProblematicThreatForMostAmericansAndTheAmericanDreamKeyJ6TrumpTranscriptMHLivingNews
https://www.manufacturedhomelivingnews.com/show-me-the-man-and-ill-show-you-the-crime-donald-j-trump-arrest-indictments-perspective-on-problematic-threat-for-most-americans-and-the-american-drea/
TheTrumpArrestWhyItMeansBusinessAsUsualIsDeadorDyingAndThePartyIsOverMalcomX-AI-OrwellianTwoMinutesOfHateAndSilverLiningsMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/masthead/the-trump-arrest-why-it-means-business-as-usual-is-dead-or-dying-and-the-party-is-over-malcom-x-ai-orwellian-two-minutes-of-hate-and-silver-linings/
RichMenNorthOfRichmondMeetsTrumpOnTuckerMoreEvidenceOfAntiEstablishmentWaveForProEstablishmentRINOsDemocratsAndNeverTrumpersPlusMHVilleMarketUpdatesMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/rich-men-north-of-richmond-meets-trump-on-tucker-evidence-for-establishment-rinos-democrats-and-never-trumper-wake-up-calls/

BenGarrisonThatAwfulCNN-ItsFoxNews-DemocratsAndAntitrumpFiguresOnFoxNews-MHProNews

 

DarkDayInUSATrumpNYTimesSay45thPresidentIndictedBoxesHoaxTrumpSaysElectionInterferenceByCorruptBidenAdminWhatPartisanPunditsSayingPlusMHVilleMarketUpdatesMHProNews
https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/dark-day-in-usa-trump-ny-times-say-45th-president-indicted-boxes-hoax-trump-says-election-interference-by-corrupt-biden-admin/

 

Summary and Conclusion

Legal voters and lawfully cast legal votes should decided this next election.

Those who think it acceptable that the legal system is being manipulated to attempt to disenfranchise tens of millions of Americans should try to shoe on the other foot approach that Democrat Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz likes to point to in his talks on issues like this one. Would Democrats want one of their candidates charged with a bogus crime and even before there is a trial, keep such a person off the ballot?

When one constitutionally protected right is threatened, others are too.

MHProNews plans to monitor and periodically report as deemed warranted. ###

 

RiggedSystemFeudalFascistMarxistMegaCapitalistSocialistCorporateShellGamesUnderstandWhyWorkingMiddleClassesStruggleAmericanDreamAffordableHomeownershipFadesFactsAnalysisMHLivingNews
https://www.manufacturedhomelivingnews.com/rigged-system-feudal-fascist-marxist-megacapitalist-socialist-corporate-shell-games-understand-why-working-middle-classes-struggle-american-dream-affordable-homeownership-fades-facts-analysis/

 

Part IV – is our Daily Business News on MHProNews stock market recap which features our business-daily at-a-glance update of over 2 dozen manufactured housing industry stocks.

This segment of the Daily Business News on MHProNews is the recap of yesterday evening’s market report, so that investors can see at glance the type of topics may have influenced other investors. Thus, our format includes our signature left (CNN Business) and right (Newsmax) ‘market moving’ headlines.

The macro market move graphics below provide context and comparisons for those invested in or tracking manufactured housing connected equities. Meaning, you can see ‘at a glance’ how manufactured housing connected firms do compared to other segments of the broader equities market.

In minutes a day readers can get a good sense of significant or major events while keeping up with the trends that are impacting manufactured housing connected investing.

 

Reminder: several of the graphics on MHProNews can be opened into a larger size. For instance: click the image and follow the prompts in your browser or device to OPEN In a New Window. Then, in several browsers/devices you can click the image and increase the size. Use the ‘x out’ (close window) escape or back key to return.

 

Headlines from left-of-center CNN Business – from the morning of 12.21.2023

Yahoo-ManufacturedHomeCommunitiesMobileHomeParksFactoriesProductionSuppliersFinanceStocksEquitiesClosingDataYahooFinanceLog12.21.2023MHProNews
In instances such as Apollo, Berkshire Hathaway, Blackstone or others, manufactured housing may only be part of their corporate interests. Note: depending on your browser or device, many images in this report and others on MHProNews can be clicked to expand. Click the image and follow the prompts. For example, in some browsers/devices you click the image and select ‘open in a new window.’ After clicking that selection you click the image in the open window to expand the image to a larger size. To return to this page, use your back key, escape or follow the prompts.
Notice: MHProNews invites the firms named in these reports to respond to any concerns about possibly inaccurate information via email that identifies the concern and offers evidence that sheds a different light on the topic discussed. That said, neither publicly MHI nor by email have MHI and their ‘insider brands’ done so. They’ve been repeatedly invited to do so, including an outreach on Dec 7, 2o23.
mas kovach mhpronews shopping with soheyla .jp

Get our ‘read-hot’ industry-leading 

get our ‘read-hot’ industry-leading emailed headline news updates

Scroll to Top