“The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably — PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots — overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher. The case has been added to the docket for, appropriately, January 6, 2023.” So wrote former Arkansas Governor, TV host, pundit, and prior GOP candidate for U.S. President Michael “Mike” Huckabee on 12.16.2022. Note spacing errors in the original from Huckabee have been correct in this report, but the text remains as posted here on Public Now.
According to Huckabee, “As Joshua Philipp [editor and senior investigative reporter for the Epoch Times] reported in a podcast for EPOCH TV, the case Brunson v. Alma Adams, et. al., alleges that members of Congress who voted against the proposed 10-day audit of the 2020 elections and certifying those results — with no investigation after being “properly warned” of a credible threat from enemies of the Constitution — were violating their oath of office to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic. “It says that “this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of law.”
If SCOTUS ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the remedy would conceivably involve removing the sitting President and Vice President and all those representatives and empower the Court to authorize the swearing-in of the rightful President and Vice President. Not kidding; that’s the remedy the plaintiffs are asking for.
The Brunson brothers are an interesting group — literally a band of brothers, as they play in a trumpet band. Here they are, with their summary of the suit, which was reportedly written by just themselves, without legal counsel (!).”
When Huckabee says they are acting without legal counsel, that means they brought the case as pro se litigants.
From the Brunson website is what follows a few paragraphs below. Note that from their key ‘event’ segment is this: “August 14, 2022 The Supreme Court of the United States (The brothers realize that they no longer have to wait for a decision from the 10th Circuit of Appeals. The Rule 11 enables them to bypass the 10th Circuit and go straight to the SCOTUS.” SCOTUS is short for the Supreme Court of the United States. So, this band ‘discovered’ a way to advance their case more rapidly to the high court by using what they described as a Rule 11 technicality.
Huckabee noted that he was surprised by this legal development, with this observation: “Actually, I am [surprised], too, considering the way the [High] Court refused to look into those very allegations in the weeks after the election, when they were brought by President Trump. (Of course, now we know much more about the lengths to which Trump’s enemies went to interfere with the outcome. Maybe enough Justices are feeling some guilt right now about calling the issue “moot.”).
Given several of the revelations from the Twitter Files which are being described by some as evidence of “election tampering” – which have followed years of claims of other evidence of election fraud, the pro se legal work by these brothers seems incredibly lucky, well timed, or an obvious combination of factors that Huckabee implied with his “now we know much more about the lengths to which Trump’s enemies went to interfere with the 2020 election outcome.”
Typos in the following from the Brunsons’ website are in the original. Per their webpage is the following.
Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al.,
(Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)
Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other.
The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court.
The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS),
Docket #22-380, where 9 Justices in conference will vote (only 4 needed) to move to a hearing.
THE LAWSUIT
Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election. BOTH LAWSUITS ARE ABOUT THE DEFENDANTS BREAKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”THE QUESTION
How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don’t believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can’t. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.THE RELIEF THAT LOY AND RALAND ARE SEEKING
That defendants be permanantly removed from office, and not allowed to hold a public office again.
BACKGROUND
Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.
The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.
Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a “Complaint” and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants. Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy’s lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland’s lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS. Here are the events of both lawsuits:
EVENTS
(To be updated when a new event occurs)
LOY BRUNSON
March 23, 2021
The Complaint
(Loy files the complaint in the Utah Federal Court)
March 29, 2021 1st Amended Complaint
(The brothers make changes, and Loy files the 1st Amended complaint in the Utah Federal Court)
March 31, 2021 1st Amended Complaint Served
(The Clerk of the Court had the U.S. Marshalls serve the 1st Amended Complaint on 85 defendants, including Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters before being stopped by the Court, claiming it was a “clerical error by the Deputy Clerk”.)Judge Romero asks Loy to Amend the Complaint, along with instructions on how to make it better.
April 6, 2021 2nd Amended Complaint
(Loy Brunson (following Judge Romero’s instructions) files his 2nd Amended Complaint in Utah Federal Court.)
April 20, 2021 3rd Amended Complaint
(The brothers make changes, and Loy submits the 3rd Amended complaint for it to be filed in the Utah Federal Court)
JUDGE ROMERO (WHO KINDLY GAVE LOY INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO MAKE THE COMPLAINT BETTER) IS NOW REPLACED WITH A DIFFERENT JUDGE, AND WITHOUT AN EXPLANATION, THE NEW JUDGE HOLDS OFF ON FILING THE 3RD AMENDED COMPLAINT.
THE BROTHERS DECIDE TO GO TO THE HIGHER COURT ABOUT IT.
June 1, 2021 Writ of Mandamus to the Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
(Loy files a pleading to have the 10th Circuit compel the Federal Court to file Loy’s 3rd Amended Complaint)THE TENTH CIRCUIT DENIES THE PLEADING
(explaining that the Federal Court will eventually get to it when they can.)
June 20, 2021 1st Motion to Reconsider
(Loy files a motion reminding them that the Federal Court accepted his filing fee, but won’t file his 3rd Amended Complaint, asking the 10th Circuit to reconsider, quoting the rule that the Federal Court must administer “without denial or unecessary delay”)THE TENTH CIRCUIT ONCE AGAIN DENIES THE PLEADING
(explaining once again that the Federal Court will eventually get to it when they can.)
THE BROTHERS DECIDE TO SUE THE FEDERAL COURT AS WELL AS THE 10TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, ASKING THEM TO EITHER RETURN LOY’S FILING FEE, OR FILE HIS 3RD AMENDED COMPLAINT.
August 10, 2021 Lawsuit against the two Federal Courts Filed. (Loy v. Utah Federal Court & the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals)
(Loy goes to the Utah 4th District Court and files the lawsuit against the two Federal Courts. Even though the U.S. Attorneys explain to the Court that it cannot judge a case against the Federal Courts, Judge Low accepts the filing fee and judges the case anyway.)BY MOTIONS FROM THE U.S. ATTORNEYS, THE 4th DISTRICT COURT DISMISSES LOY’S COMPLAINT THAT WAS AGAINST THE TWO FEDERAL COURTS
(explaining that the Federal Court will get to filing his 3rd Amended Complaint when they can.)
THE BROTHERS MAKE FOUR MORE ATTEMPTS TO HAVE THE DISTRICT COURT COMPEL THE TWO FEDERAL COURTS TO FILE LOY’S 3RD AMENDED COMPLAINT. ALL ATTEMPTS DENIED WITH THE SAME EXPLANATION
November 3, 2021 3rd Amended Complaint Filed!
(After 7 months, and for reasons not explained, the Federal court files Loy’s 3rd Amended Complaint and back dates it to April 20, 2021)
December 30, 2021 4th Amended Complaint
(The brothers make changes and Loy submits the 4th Amended complaint to be filed in the Utah Federal Court.
The Court waits until March 28, 2022 to finally file it.)
April 22, 2022 The Summons
(The court issues the summons for the 388 defendants. The Clerk of the Court contacts Loy and let’s him know that he can pick up the box filled with the Summons for the 388 defendants that have been stamped with the seal of the court. The brothers can now serve all 388 defendants with the summons and complaint.)
April 26, 2022 Serving the lawsuit on all 388 defendants
(The brothers along with their friend Duane Bingham stuffs envelopes with a copy of the complaint along with the summons for the 388 defendants. The brothers are using the U.S. Postal Service to act as process servers to all defendants. The 388 packets were delivered to the post office staff who were waiting to process the service.)The defendants have 60 days to answer the complaint.
July 1, 2022 U.S. Attorneys Motion To Dismiss
(The U.S. Attorneys file a motion to dismiss Loy’s lawsuit on the grounds that defendants are protected under Title 28 which gives defendents Soveriegn Immunity from any lawsuits relating to actions of treason while serving in the capacity of their office. The U.S. Attorneys also file a notice of appearance in behalf of all the defendants, making them the official attorneys on record, instead of representing them “specially”. )
July 6, 2022 Opposition to Motion To Dismiss
(The brothers prepare the opposition to the Attorneys’ attempt to dismiss the the lawsuit, and Loy files it in the Utah Federal Court. the brothers are still waiting to this day for the court to make a decision.)
RALAND J. BRUNSON
June 21, 2021
The Complaint
(The brothers take a copy of Loy’s 4th Amended Complaint, puts Raland’s name in the place of Loy. Raland files the complaint in the Utah 2nd District Court.)
July 25, 2021 3 Defendants Served
(The brothers acquire from the Court the Summons for Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, and Raland uses the Post Office as process servers. Defendants have until August 23rd to answer the complaint.)
August 5, 2021 Lawsuit moved from State Court to Federal Court
(The U.S. Attorneys catch wind of the lawsuit, step in acting in behalf of the United States (not the defendants) and moves the case to the Federal Court.)
August 5, 2021 Motion to Dismiss
(The U.S. Attorneys, acting in behalf of the United States (not the defendants) file a motion to dismiss Raland’s lawsuit.)
December 13, 2021 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
(After a battle regarding what court has proper jurisdiction, and after another change in who will judge it, the brothers prepare a motion opposing the Attorneys’ attempt to dismiss Raland’s lawsuit.)
February 2, 2022 Dismiss Granted
(Judge Hill Parrish dismisses Raland’s lawsuit, claiming that the defendants have Sovereign Immunity which is designed to protect them from having to account for aiding the enemies of the Constitution because it was done while acting in the capacity of their office.)
February 14, 2022 Raland Files an Appeal to the 10th Circuit
(The brothers decide to appeal Raland’s dismissal.)
August 14, 2022 The Supreme Court of the United States
(The brothers realize that they no longer have to wait for a decision from the 10th Circuit of Appeals. The Rule 11 enables them to bypass the 10th Circuit and go straight to the SCOTUS. Their brother Deron spent the past week crafting a perfectly well written petition for writ of certiorari. On this day Deron had his two brothers Loy and Raland fine tune it in preparation for the SCOTUS and the proper format for the printers.)
September 23, 2022 Petition for Writ of Certiorari Received
(The SCOTUS received the petition along with the copies for the Justices.)
September 28, 2022 A phone call from SCOTUS
(The Clerk of the SCOTUS calls Raland requesting for a revision of the Petition that would include more information on the lawsuit and wondering how soon they could get it.)
October 17, 2022 2nd phone call from SCOTUS
(The Clerk of the SCOTUS calls Raland again. She asks “how are you doing on your revision of the Writ with the additional information that we need?” Raland said “We’re working on it as we speak!” She said “how soon can we get it?” Raland said “Right away!”)
October 20, 2022 Revised Petition shipped to the SCOTUS
October 24, 2022 Petition docketed!
(The clerk of the Court tells Raland that they have everything they need. The U.S. Attorneys have until Nov 23, 2022 to respond showing why the Supreme Court of the United States should not move on this case.)
November 23, 2022 The Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice replaces the U.S. Attorneys
(Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit, thus allowing the SCOTUS to move forward!)
November 30, 2022 The SCOTUS set the conference date for Jan 6, 2023
(The 9 Justices will meet January 6, 2023 to discuss the case and decide (by vote) if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will oficially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office)
Note that officials from the Biden administration, per the narrative above, is actively defending against this suit. That is no surprise. If government officials were by some miracle to lose at SCOTUS then the phrase “PINO” for Joseph R. “Joe” Biden would no longer be a mere allegation or speculation. An entirely new chapter of American history would have to be written to describe a period where a President in Name Only (PINO) existed.
With that background, here is how the WND NewsCenter described the case, which they have provided to MHProNews by agreement.
WND
Supremes to review case challenging American election results
‘These are not normal times’
By Bob Unruh Published December 18, 2022 at 1:58pm
A lawsuit that actually could challenge American election results, and possibly overturn them, is heading for a conference in the U.S. Supreme Court in just weeks.
The case does not allege the 2020 election was stolen.
Instead, it alleges “that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” according to a report in the Gateway Pundit.
A guest report at the website by Tim Canova explains the little-known case, Brunson v. Adams, was filed by four brothers from Utah, acting as their own counsel, and it actually seeks the “removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 presidential election.”
The report speculated, “The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.”
The report explained the “national security interests” implicated by the allegations allowed it to bypass the appeals court and move up to the Supreme Court, “which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023.
It would require the votes of only four justices to move the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari forward, the report said.
Bottom of Form
Canova reported, “It seems astounding that the court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for justices, and thereby open the door to packing the court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices ‘shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.'”
The report noted the threats may be providing an incentive for the justices to review the case, “as a shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the court’s independence.”
The issue is a serious one for America’s democracy, being the violation by public officials of their constitutional oath of office “by rubber-stamping electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference.”
The report also pointed out that the FBI was colluding with social media giants to censor bad news about the Bidens in the days just before the election.
It called that “a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government.” Then there’s the partisan Jan. 6 committee that Nancy Pelosi has assembled.
“Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution — the supreme law of the land — to rig an election, the only recourse may be the Supreme Court or military tribunals,” the report suggested.
The report notes that Congress, in fact, was put on notice before its Jan. 6, 2021 vote by “more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations.” ##
Additional Information with More MHProNews Analysis and Commentary in Brief
Multiyear readers of MHProNews may recall that MHProNews periodically reported on events related to election allegations, the federal handling of COVID19, and other macro issues that obviously have an impact on public policy, the U.S. economy, and thus affordable housing and manufactured homes role in it. While such factual, evidence-based reports with clearly defined editorial analysis may have partisan implications, they are nevertheless nonpartisan in nature. As a relevant disclosure, MHProNews’ top management are political independents.
Huckabee posted the following on the same page noted above, which mirrored what WND referenced from the Gateway Pundit.
“Here are some thoughts on the case from Timothy Canova, a professor of constitutional law at the Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law,” wrote Huckabee. The former governor, whose daughter Sarah Huckabee Sanders was recently elected as the next governor for Arkansas, then shared the following.
This story was originally published on December 5.
It’s hard to believe with so many contenders, but there are times when Donald Trump is his own worst enemy. He had a perfect opportunity to respond to the revelation that Twitter was colluding with Democrats to rig the 2020 election, taking orders from them to silence inconvenient speech like a waitress at a short order restaurant. Unfortunately, Trump released this statement:
“So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
I agree with that last line, but how could he not know that suggesting we terminate the rules in the Constitution was like handing his enemies a weapon to bash him with on a silver platter, which they also bashed him with. It played right into the “authoritarian insurrectionist” narrative they’ve been trying to gin up for years. Trump actually gave President Biden – the beneficiary of all that unconstitutional censorship of free speech – the high ground to defend the Constitution against him, and Biden’s been using the Constitution as Charmin since his first minute in office. I think in sports, they call this an “unforced error.”
This is the type of unpredictable and unnecessary media storm that has many Republicans, even Trump supporters, looking to Ron DeSantis as an alternative who might carry on Trump’s policies without the drama and baggage. That’s showing up in a new poll by WPA Intelligence, a firm used by top GOP politicians and organizations. Trump’s favorability rating among Republicans is now 70%, which sounds high but is down quite a bit from its peak.
Meanwhile, DeSantis’ net favorability rating is higher than Trump’s among several demographics, including Republicans (+66 to +44), Fox News viewers (+58 to +27) and even 2020 Trump voters (+69 to +54.) DeSantis also does better among all-important Independent voters, 66% of whom view Trump unfavorably. DeSantis has a net -3 favorability rating among Independents, which sounds bad until you hear that Biden is at -27 and Trump -39.
That article rightly warns that polls shouldn’t be taken too seriously, especially at this stage. But this should serve as a warning sign to Trump’s circle that Republican voters consider 2024 to be too important to risk on someone who shoots from the hip and hits his own foot. If Trump wants to know how badly some ill-chosen words can hurt you, I have two words for him to consider: “Kanye West.” Those are also two words that should never again appear on his dinner guest list. ##
That noted, the following are arguably relevant Twitter threads that included Lara Logan. Logan is mocked by some, but the self-described independent-minded reporter Logan hails from the same nation that Elon Musk does, South Africa.
Per left-leaning Wikipedia: “Lara Logan (born 29 March 1971) is a South African television and radio journalist and war correspondent. Logan’s career began in South Africa with various news organizations in the 1990s. Her profile rose due to reporting around the American invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.”
“Tell me this wasn’t planned. All of it. And we’re the crazy ones? Yea right.” – Lara Logan.
Watch this and have your mind blown. Whoever wrote the script for this episode of X-Files has to be a time traveler or a senior deep state operative who revealed the entire plan just for giggles
100% 👍 men work 40+ hours a week and come home to relax and watch football all weekend. Stay up too late Sunday night on a late scheduled game. Wake up beat tired on Monday just to do it all over again.
From the political left and the political right there are apparently credible voices that have long decried a ‘rigged system.’ MHProNews has over the last several years increasingly raised that concern as it has clear impacts on housing policy, which means this claim has implications for manufactured housing. One example of that is found in the fall of 2022 (10.15.2022) report linked below.
Whether these events being described by Huckabee, Logan, and others may seem to be a David vs. Goliath style long shots aimed at a “rigged system” is apparent.
What ought to be of keen interest to people of good will is that an array of professionals and experts that hail from opposite sides of the left-right political divide in the U.S.A. could be seen, to some extent, as coalescing on the theme of a deftly albeit illegally “rigged” and “corrupt” system. The examples that follow span some 25 years, with most of these remarks from the last 5 years or less. The first quotation from former Governor Jerry Brown (CA-D) specifically names the role that corporations play in this claimed scenario of a broadly rigged system.
Quote from a 1996 interview with Jerry Brown. What was seen by some then is even more visible today. They come from different political parties (essentially two Democrats, one Republican). They often have entirely different proposed solutions, but they each have pointed to several of the same facts that make the claim of a ‘rigged system.’ That is significant. This is one of several blazing yet pithy insights from RF Kennedy Jr. While Bush and Obama were from two different political parties, and they certainly had distinctive policies, they were each globalists that used their respective crisis to consolidate power for their billionaire backers and corporate interests. That ought to make thinkers recall President Dwight D. “Ike” Eisenhower and his warning against the military industrial complex. The events of the President John F. “Jack” Kennedy years have recently been revived by claims that the CIA was involved in the plot to kill the president. While hardly a new thought, if the remarks made by Tucker Carlson are in fact backed by documentation that has not yet been released to the public, that places the concerns on a higher level. Or on themes often similar to RF Kennedy Jr, think of the quotes previously shared from CA Gov Jerry Brown. To see this remark in context, the featured report further below. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/dirty-great-reset-secretthe-great-resetabout-money-and-power-plenty-available-for-ruling-class-elites-justin-haskins-heartland-institute-nbc-news-warren-buff/
As was noted above, President Dwight D. “Ike” Eisenhauer (R) warned in his farewell address of the threat from the military industrial complex. These comments were made on 1.17.1961, approaching 62 years ago.
President John F. “Jack” Kennedy (D), like “Ike,” utilized the CIA and various aspects of the military-spy-intelligence apparatus of the state. Kennedy and his brother Robert had ongoing tussles with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) head J. Edgar Hoover, who reportedly has ‘dirt’ on the Kennedys. Put differently, for those who think there is a “swampy” “deep state” today, there is historical evidence that it existed well over 60 years ago. Kennedy said at one point he wanted to break up the CIA and scatter its remnants to the winds.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr, attorney, author, and chairman of a health advocacy nonprofit, has said several times that he does not buy the official narrative of either his uncle John F. Kennedy’s assassination nor the cover story on the assassination of his father, the late Senator Robert F. “Bobby” Kennedy. Those remarks by RFK Jr were years before the recent claims made by Tucker Carlson about the assassination of his father being linked to possible CIA involvement.
The most courageous newscast in 60 years. The CIA’s murder of my uncle was a successful coup d’état from which our democracy has never recovered. @TuckerCarlsonhttps://t.co/qJ1sUdhe4t
Against this backdrop it is noteworthy that RFK Jr, a Democrat, is NOT embraced by a purportedly corrupted and Democratic party run Biden White House. But for balance, it is necessary to grasp that Republicans have their “Establishment” wing that is dominated by corporate interests and the same deep state interests. Some 15 months ago, MHProNews provided this romp through history that illustrates historic concerns about members of both major U.S. political parties.
A general awareness of these developments is potentially useful and arguably necessary for manufactured housing professionals. For instance. If the macro system is this corrupted, then the case that the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) and its corporate masters have to some degree followed the broader national pattern is even more plausible. That noted, ‘the case’ for corruption in manufactured housing is not dependent upon evidence of national corruption. An example of that is found in the article linked below.
Additionally, what Huckabee described as ‘a longest of long shot cases’ ought to remind MHVille readers of is this. Given a proper presentation, evidence, and some seemingly serendipitous outcomes, other legal actions could be brought. Those other cases could focus on the vexing issues that have arguably plague MHVille for most of the 21st century. The evidence is ample. They may not be as much of a longshot as this Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al., (Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of both major parties in Congress) case that is now set for a hearing with SCOTUS.
See the linked reports to learn more about those interrelated topics. Whatever the outcome, this introduction to these issues reveals a kind of ‘madness’ that merits this report on this Monday, Monday. ###
Click here to subscribe to the most complete and obviously most read manufactured housing industry news in seconds. Enter your desired email address, press submit, confirm in your inbox. Then You’re All Set for x2 weekly emailed news updates! To report a news tip – either ON or OFF the record – click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP or COMMENTS in the subject line.
Our son has grown quite a bit since this 12.2019 photo. All on Capitol Hill were welcoming and interested in our manufactured housing industry related concerns. But Congressman Al Green’s office was tremendous in their hospitality. Our son’s hand is on a package that included the Constitution of the United States, bottled water, and other goodies.
Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing.
For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.
This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position, and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.
