The federal government spends billions of dollars annually on intelligence and pandemic prevention. Additionally, billions has been paid by the U.S. and other governments to the World Health Organization (WHO), which is also supposed to be in the business of contagious disease spread prevention. Nevertheless, somehow about 1½ years after the purported escape from the Communist Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology, it is now that fact-checkers and mainstream media are suddenly ‘discovering’ concerns that MHProNews, MHLivingNews and some other intrepid souls reported on a year or more ago. Many of these items involve Dr. Anthony “Tony” Fauci, his connections to billionaire-oligarch Bill Gates, who in turn has deep ties with Warren Buffett, Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway – which has masterfully subverted a once far greater affordable manufactured home industry.
The previously referenced phrase used by Edward Curtin, “a tapestry of lies” is an apt expression for the audacious “deception and misdirection” ploy that Americans and our profession have been subjected to for too many years. In fairness, there are some voices across the left-right divide that have had the courage to name names even in the face of a “blinding propaganda” deployed against the citizens of our nation. That propaganda was also used to attract and manipulate millions of non-citizens who have entered our land illegally, but with the tacit desire by corrupt corporate interests that have used their power in government to allow these harmful, costly, and deadly outrages to occur. The corruptions and scandals are so vast that it would seem to outrageous for a work of fiction to be believable, but they are documentable and true. To illustrate the level of swampy corruption, this Masthead will focus on Dr. Fauci and the COVID19 connected outrages.
As a teaser, the point here is not to make people feel helpless in the face of such horrific, massive, and amoral sleaze. Rather, in no specific order of importance, it is to:
- provide new readers with evidence-based reports and analysis that highlight the issues involved in one article.
- To confirm topics previously reported by MHProNews and MHLivingNews – to remind longtime readers that our initial and subsequent reports are now becoming more accepted by the mainstream media. Rephrased, we were right – while many in the mainstream media were either wrong and/or duplicitously involved in covering up these scandals. Why? To advance their own agendas, which included, but were not limited to the various oligarch’s moats involved and the 2020 election cycle.
- To reveal in the conclusion near the end of this report the already existent tools needed to stop this apparently metastasized cancer on our economic and political life.
The following reports are from the WND NewsCenter, and are used with permission. Note that as part of our agreement with WND, MHProNews can’t change or insert hot-links to our own reports that covered some of these same topics months ago. For instance, Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan was one of several medical sources this publication referenced pre-election. But months before that, MHProNews and our MHLivingNews sister-site pointed to other sources that made it plain that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the likely source, and that the Gates Foundation and WHO had their financial fingerprints on this still-evolving tragedy. Over a year ago, the Masthead said that this was the crime of the century and a massive transfer of wealth upward.
That said, this series of WND NewsCenter articles and reports will sequentially lay out the puzzle pieces to reveal a picture of the deception and misdirection summarized above. They will be followed by additional MHProNews commentary, analysis, links, and proposed next steps toward solutions.
By Elizabeth Stauffer, The Western Journal
Published May 25, 2021 at 3:18pm
The thing about “experts” in any field, and the fact-checkers who validate (or invalidate) their conclusions, is that being human, they each have their own (sometimes hidden) opinions. biases and sets of unique life circumstances which combine to shape their personal agendas. Before we can consider and ultimately accept their “facts,” we need to remember that, above all else, they are human beings, heavily influenced and motivated by their agendas.
Until now, experts, including the ubiquitous Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden’s chief medical advisor and the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, or NIAID, and fact-checkers have told us the coronavirus had zoonotic origins, meaning that it jumped from an animal to a human, possibly at the Wuhan, China, wet market.
Those who thought it was possible the virus may have escaped from the nearby Wuhan Lab of Virology where gain-of-function research was being conducted and that the disease may have been enhanced (intensified, made more lethal) during their lab experiments, were called conspiracy theorists.
The left claimed that blaming China for the virus was racist and xenophobic.
In September, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson invited Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a virologist and former postdoctoral fellow at the University of Hong Kong, onto his show. She said, “This virus, COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus, actually is not from nature. It is a man-made virus created in the lab.”
Carlson asked Yan to “give us, for a non-scientific audience, a summary of why you believe this virus came from a lab in Wuhan.”
“I can present solid scientific evidence to our audience that this virus, COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus, actually is not from nature,” Yan replied. “It is a man-made virus created in the lab.”
She said that, previously, the bat coronavirus could not affect people, but after the [lab] modifications, it became a very harmful virus.
Carlson says, “You’re saying that the Chinese government manufactured this virus if I’m hearing you correctly?”
“Yes, exactly …,” Yan says.
She explained how the evidence that it was man-made could be found in the genome itself and that “big suppression” was coming from the Chinese Communist Party.
PolitiFact’s Daniel Funke wrote that “the claim is inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!”
“The genetic structure of the novel coronavirus, which has been shared by thousands of scientists worldwide, rules out the possibility that it was manipulated in a lab,” Funke told readers. “Public health authorities have repeatedly said the virus was not created in a lab. Scientists believe the coronavirus originated in bats before jumping to humans. Experts have publicly rebuked Yan’s paper, and it’s unclear whether it was peer reviewed.”
Funke makes a heroic effort to disprove Yan’s claims, citing an endless number of experts, researchers and health officials. He points out that Facebook and Instagram had both flagged the video as “false information.”
“But how do we know Yan’s claims about the coronavirus are wrong — and where do they come from? Let’s review the facts,” asks Funke rhetorically.
His answer: Because “scientists worldwide have publicly shared the genetic makeup of the coronavirus thousands of times. If the virus had been altered, there would be evidence in its genome data.”
“But there isn’t. In March, several microbiology, infectious disease and evolutionary biology experts wrote in Nature — a respected scientific journal — that the genetic makeup of the coronavirus does not indicate it was altered.”
“Instead, scientists have two plausible explanations for the origin of the virus: natural selection in an animal host, or natural selection in humans after the virus jumped from animals.”
Funke never quite explains how “the genetic structure of the novel coronavirus rules out laboratory manipulation.” Just that it does.
His entire argument boils down to: Because experts say so. And they’ve said so repeatedly.
Very recently, an “awakening” if you will, seems to have begun among people who, for over a year, have refused to even consider the possibility that the coronavirus may have escaped from the Wuhan lab. “Experts” are quietly reversing their earlier positions.
Two weeks ago, pushed hard by Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky during a Senate hearing, even Dr. Fauci opened the door to the lab leak theory.
Are these people trying to cover themselves ahead of a future revelation? Maybe.
Last week, PolitiFact retracted their September fact check about Yan’s remarks on Tucker Carlson’s show. An editor’s note read: “When this fact-check was first published in September 2020, PolitiFact’s sources included researchers who asserted the SARS-CoV-2 virus could not have been manipulated. That assertion is now more widely disputed. For that reason, we are removing this fact-check from our database pending a more thorough review. Currently, we consider the claim to be unsupported by evidence and in dispute. The original fact-check in its entirety is preserved below for transparency and archival purposes. Read our May 2021 report for more on the origins of the virus that causes COVID-19.”
Now, it’s looking more likely than ever that the virus originated in the lab.
Last week, Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee released a report to Fox News, which said there is growing “circumstantial evidence” that the virus came from a lab.
An article published by The Wall Street Journal on Sunday reported that a State Department fact sheet, issued during the final days of the Trump administration said three researchers from the Wuhan Lab fell ill in November 2019 and were hospitalized “with symptoms consistent with both Covid-19 and common seasonal illness.”
Conservatives have been suspicious all along due to the fact that a lab that had been conducting research on the virus was located nearby and that we are dealing with China, which cannot be trusted. But experts and the media told us we were wrong and the fact-checkers went to town.
The parade of experts, researchers and renowned scientists, each with their own agendas, never offered an explanation for why the coronavirus couldn’t have come from the lab or why it couldn’t have been modified. Just that it couldn’t. And we were supposed to accept it.
“Pants on Fire?” I don’t think so.
In the video below, Fox News contributor and radio host Dan Bongino “gives the ‘fact checkers’ at @PolitiFact the verbal beatdown they deserve.” ##
— Bongino Report (@BonginoReport) May 24, 2021
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
MHProNews note: Once more for emphasis, each of these WND NewsCenter articles were selected to systematically lay out the ‘emerging evidence’ being acknowledged by mainstream media and others that previously claimed this was quackery, conspiracy theories, and that anyone who believe it was foolish. Well, it now seems that many in the media, often but not exclusively anti-Trump voices, are the ones with egg on their face.
But in the meantime, millions were led to believe things that simply were not true.
Alternative media were mocked for reporting ‘ridiculous conspiracy theory’
By Art Moore
Published May 25, 2021 at 7:07pm
On the heels of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s admission that the lab-leak theory is a possible explanation for the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Washington Post is also changing its tune amid growing circumstantial evidence.
The story, “Timeline: How the Wuhan lab-leak theory suddenly became credible,” is by Glenn Kessler, who writes the Post’s “Fact Checker” column.
Kessler wrote Tuesday that in “recent months the idea that it emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) – once dismissed as a ridiculous conspiracy theory – has gained new credence.”
“How and why did this happen?” he asked. “For one, efforts to discover a natural source of the virus have failed. Second, early efforts to spotlight a lab leak often got mixed up with speculation that the virus was deliberately created as a bioweapon.”
Kessler – known for his “Pinocchio” ratings evaluating the truthfulness of statements by public figures and media – said that those two facts made it “easier for many scientists to dismiss the lab scenario as tin-hat nonsense.”
But there is evidence that the Wuhan lab collaborated with the People’s Liberation Army, and many who long have been skeptical of the natural-origin theory pushed by Beijing argue establishment media simply didn’t do their job. Instead, they took the word of the Chinese Communist Party and of scientists blinded by a hatred for Donald Trump and, in some instances, saddled with a conflict of interest.
A Washington Post story on May 1, 2020, was headlined “Was the new coronavirus accidentally released from a Wuhan lab? It’s doubtful.”
CNN.com ran a story May 5, 2020, titled “Anthony Fauci just crushed Donald Trump’s theory on the origins of the coronavirus.”
Among the skeptics of the natural origin theory is Cambridge-educated British science writer Nicholas Wade, who is known for a New York Times column he wrote for many years.
In a lengthy analysis published this month in which he contends the circumstantial evidence points overwhelmingly to a lab leak, he noted a February 2020 letter signed by a group of virologists and others published in the eminent British science journal The Lancet.
The scientists insisted on a natural origin and condemned “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”
Establishment media, Wade pointed out, largely ran with that conclusion without any serious investigation.
The scientists wrote that they “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife” and called on readers to stand with Chinese colleagues on the frontline of fighting the disease.
But Wade showed how the signatories “were assuring the public of facts they could not know for sure were true.” It turned out that the letter had been organized and drafted by the president of the EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Daszak.
The fact that Daszak’s organization funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab – a clear conflict of interest – was not disclosed to The Lancet’s readers, Wade noted. To the contrary, the letter concluded, “We declare no competing interests.” And, significantly, Daszak was the sole American representative on the WHO team investigating the pandemic’s origin.
The news site Vox has quietly revised a March 4, 2020, article on the origin of COVID-19 that cited the declaration in The Lancet.
Titled “The Conspiracy Theories About the Origins of the Coronavirus, Debunked,” it said “virologists who’ve parsed the genome and infectious disease experts who study coronaviruses have more than enough evidence to show that the virus is brand new and came from nature, not the Wuhan lab,” the National Pulse reported.
Vox said a “large group of them, citing genome analyses from multiple countries, recently affirmed in The Lancet that the virus originated in wildlife.”
“The emergence of the virus in the same city as China’s only level 4 biosafety lab, it turns out, is pure coincidence,” they said.
Among the changes to the article one year later were exchanging “is” for “appears to be” and deleting “not the Wuhan lab.”
The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that three Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers became ill with COVID-like symptoms in November 2019 and sought hospital care, according to a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report.
‘Always reasonable’ theory
Kessler acknowledged that from the beginning of the pandemic, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., was spotlighting the Wuhan lab’s location at the epicenter of the outbreak and pressing China for answers.
On Monday, Cotton said on Twitter that the lab leak hypothesis was “always reasonable” yet denounced as a conspiracy theory by “reporters & activists in white lab coats.”
“The common-sense case for a lab leak is the same as it was in January 2020, when I first mentioned the possibility,” the senator said.
“Isn’t it strange that this once-in-a-century bat coronavirus pandemic just happened to emerge within a few miles of China’s biggest laboratory researching bat coronaviruses? Shouldn’t we at least look at that lab?” he asked.
Cotton said the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Wuhan Centers for Disease Control “need to open their doors & databases for a full audit of their research—especially dangerous gain-of-function research.”
Kessler noted the Trump administration also highlighted the lab scenario, but he added that officials “generally could only point to vague intelligence.”
And, the Post columnist said, the Trump administration’s “messaging was often accompanied by anti-Chinese rhetoric that made it easier for skeptics to ignore its claims.”
That’s presumably a reference to Trump calling it the “China virus,” adopting the traditional convention of naming a virus after its place of origin.
One year ago, at the White House, Trump was asked by a reporter: “Have you seen anything at this point that gives you a high degree of confidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the origin of this virus?”
“Yes, I have. Yes, I have,” Trump replied. “And I think the World Health Organization [WHO] should be ashamed of themselves because they’re like the public relations agency for China.”
On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal reported that when Trump began pushing the lab hypothesis last year, other governments that could have helped press for a lab investigation distanced themselves from the administration, according to Andrew Bremberg, the U.S. ambassador to the WHO at the time.
“It was like an overnight shift,” he said. “When the president first touched this, they shut down.”
‘Pants on Fire’ rating.
On Monday, an interview conducted earlier this month surfaced in which Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted that the lab-leak theory is a possibility.
Ironically, the interview was conducted by the Poynter Institute’s fact-checking site PolitiFact, which less than a week later unpublished its highly influential “fact check” from last September that declared the lab-leak theory was “ridiculous,” worthy of its “Pants on Fire” rating.
In its partnership with PolitiFact, Facebook was using the “fact-check” to justify censoring accounts presenting evidence the Wuhan coronavirus originated in a lab. News organization that rely on Facebook for distribution were forced to comply with PolitiFact’s conclusion about the virus’ origin or be suspended or banished from the platform.
The Hill reporter Joe Concha recalled Tuesday in an interview with Fox New that in February 2020, when the world was beginning to learn about the virus, establishment media dismissed as conspiracy theory the concerns of Trump and Cotton that the virus might have come from a lab.
Trump and Cotton had access to classified information, Concha pointed out, and the Chinese had kicked out foreign journalists.
So how is it, he asked that establishment media and politicians were so adamant about the natural origin theory?
“How did they come to a definitive conclusion when we didn’t know what we didn’t know,” he asked.
“Why did the U.S. media believe at face value the World Health Organization … and by extension the Chinese Communist Party, that it came from a wet market blocks away from the lab, as opposed to verifying, which could take some time?”
“How could you believe the Chinese Communist Party?”
Pressed on the issue at the White House on Monday by Fox News reporter Steve Doocy, press secretary Jen Psaki insisted that the White House needed “access to the underlying data.”
“They will be waiting a long time,” Concha remarked.
The Biden administration is recommending that the WHO lead a more thorough investigation into the possibility of a lab leak. A U.S. official told the Wall Street Journal an investigation should include other laboratories in Wuhan as well as the WIV and examine “biosafety records and interview staff members.”
Meanwhile, Beijing not only rejects the lab-leak theory, it wants the WHO to probe whether the pandemic began outside of China.
“The U.S. keeps concocting inconsistent claims and clamoring to investigate labs in Wuhan,” China’s foreign ministry said in a written statement. “This fully shows that some people in the U.S. don’t care about facts and truth.”
MHProNews note: Joseph Farah is the founder, CEO, and senior editor of the WND NewsCenter.
By Joseph Farah
Published May 25, 2021 at 7:22pm
It’s time for him to go.
The man in charge of finding out to truth of how the deadly COVID-19 virus came to be.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the highest paid man on the U.S. government’s payroll.
Finally, the U.S. media are forming a consensus on coronavirus’s origins – China and the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab.
It has taken more than a year for the few credible reports on this story not to be characterized as “conspiracy theories.”
There was a report out of Thailand in November 2019 saying just that. There was a report by the Lancet after that suggesting the same thing. The Wall Street Journal found that three of the first victims of the virus worked in the lab.
But Fauci kept saying he found it difficult to accept these theories – and insisted China was cooperating with an investigation. Maybe that’s because he was one of the funders of the Wuhan research. That’s a fact, as hard as it is to believe.
To date, there have been close to 3 million deaths attributed to the pandemic worldwide.
Over a year ago, during a May 4, 2020, National Geographic interview, Fauci laughed off the possibility that the virus escaped from a lab when science editor Nsikan Akpan asked, “Do you believe or is there evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was made in the lab in China or accidentally released from a lab in China?”
Fauci argued that “if you look at the evolution of the virus in bats, and what’s out there now is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated – the way the mutations have naturally evolved.” He said that “a number of very qualified evolutionary biologists have said that everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that it evolved in nature and then jumped species.”
“If you accept the premise, which is very strongly supported by scientific evidence, that it was not deliberately mutated and deliberately changed, and you say, if it was in the wild and evolving, the likelihood it jumped species naturally, someone will say, ‘Well, maybe somebody took it from the wild, put it in the lab, and then it escaped from the lab.’ But that means it was in the wild to begin with!” he continued.
Fauci then laughed as he claimed not to understand why the possibility that the virus had escaped from a lab was being raised.
“So that’s why I don’t get what they’re talking about. If it isn’t manipulated in the lab and you’re trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment. So that’s why I don’t spend a lot of time going in that circular argument,” he said.
This is a man of “science.”
He must go. He must be eliminated from the post that lends him such credence in matters pertaining to the most important and overdue investigation the world has ever known. And we need justice for all the victims of the virus.
Fox’s Tucker Carlson Monday provided shocking details of Fauci’s “lies.”
They are legion.
He knows China has been hiding the truth as he has.
Meanwhile, those of us that pursued the truth have been vilified, shunned, canceled.
The Chinese-controlled World Health Organization abruptly lost funding from the U.S. government during President Trump’s reign. But it was reinstated by Joe Biden, without preconditions and with full funding, ensuring the cover-up would continue.
Is there something that needs investigation more?
The virus played such an important role in the U.S. election. Should we start by investigating that?
Think of all the disinformation that has been spun since Trump left office.
Heaven help us!
MHProNews note: this next WND NewsCenter report is a bit different, but still related. Because what Robert F. Kennedy Jr called “the COVID Coup” some weeks ago is still ongoing. The lessons of history tell us that anything that has happened before can happen again. To help prevent mass deception, the past and ongoing deceptions around the COVID19 and its handling must be understood. Thus, this curated report.
By Art Moore
Published May 26, 2021 at 1:06pm
Dr. Marty Makary, in an interview Tuesday with “The Vince Coglianese Show” on WMAL in Washington, claimed the United States already has achieved the objective of herd immunity, combining the vaccinated with those who have been infected. He estimates 85% of the population is immune to the novel coronavirus.
“Please, ignore the CDC guidance,” he said, calling it the slowest “most reactionary CDC in history.”
“Live a normal life, unless you are unvaccinated and did not have the infection, in which case you need to be careful,” he said in the interview, which was spotlighted by the Daily Caller.
“We’ve got to start respecting people who choose not to get the vaccine instead of demonizing them,” Makary said.
White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci recently told Business Insider vaccines are “better than the traditional response you get from natural infection.” And last week, the Food and Drug Administration issued an advisory saying the same.
But that’s contradicted by empirical study data, Yale University epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch told WND.
He pointed to a massive study in Israel finding that people who had tested positive for the novel coronavirus in the previous three or more months had at least as much protection against new infection, hospitalization and death as vaccinated people.
“People become immune by surviving infection,” argued Risch, professor of epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine.
In an email to WND, he explained that serum antibodies and T-cell antibodies – the white blood cells that attack infections – demonstrate past history of infection.
Risch said the FDA is correct that antibodies from infection are not the same as post-vaccination antibodies. But this is irrelevant, he contended.
“These natural antibodies are proof of past infection,” said Risch. “Past infection is extremely strong evidence of immunity.”
‘We are not seeing reinfections’
Makary believes that both immunity through vaccination and through infection are probably “life-long” and can be maintained without boosters.
“There is more data on natural immunity than there is on vaccinated immunity, because natural immunity has been around longer,” Makary said. “We are not seeing reinfections, and when they do happen, they’re rare. Their symptoms are mild or are asymptomatic.”
“Until they show me evidence that people who have already had the infection are dying in large numbers or being hospitalized or getting very sick, I just made my own personal decision that I’m not getting vaccinated, because I’ve already had the disease and I have natural immunity,” Paul said in an interview Sunday with John Catsimatidis on WABC radio.
By Joseph Farah
Published May 26, 2021 at 7:20pm
We all know what Dr. Anthony Fauci did as far as donating money to the Wuhan lab for the purpose of developing “gain of function” tools to increase the lethality of viruses, a plan that was previously nixed by Barack Obama in 2014.
He knew it was a risky lab. The U.S. State Department warned in 2018 about the lack of safety protocols at Wuhan, noting that the deficiencies could trigger another SARS outbreak.
Fauci’s NIH helped fund the research of China’s notorious “Bat Lady,” Wuhan’s own virologist Shi Zhengli.
But you may not have heard this — a shocking claim Fauci made over five years ago. But even the USA Today fact checkers found it to be true.
It came in a news story by Gerard Gallagher in Healio.com, a health publication, on Jan. 11, 2017.
The headline read: “Fauci: ‘No doubt’ Trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak.”
“Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said there is ‘no doubt’ Donald J. Trump will be confronted with a surprise infectious disease outbreak during his presidency.”
It came just nine days before Trump was sworn into office Jan. 20, 2017.
The report continued: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.”
Can anyone think why it would not be a surprise to Fauci? He helped develop it!
I’ll tell you what else Fauci said in the story:
“The history of the last 32 years that I have been the director of the NIAID will tell the next administration that there is no doubt they will be faced with the challenges their predecessors were faced with.”
The story continues: “While observers have speculated since his election about how Trump will respond to such challenges, Fauci and other health experts said Tuesday that preventing disease pandemics often starts overseas and that a proper response means collaboration between not only the U.S. and other countries, but also the public and private health sectors.”
“Collaboration” – that’s an unusual word for Fauci to use. He might be called a “collaborator” someday. But I digress.
Then Fauci added: “We will definitely get surprised in the next few years. Risks have never been higher.”
He really put his foot in his mouth. He’s so in love with his own voice and his position, he can say and do no wrong.
“Fauci said he is in favor of a public health emergency fund that would be used to combat outbreaks like those involving Ebola and Zika: ‘It’s tough to get it … but we need it. What we had to go through with Zika was very, very painful when the president asked for $1.9 billion in February and we didn’t get [funding] until September.”
But get this punchline.
“Near the end, Fauci speculated about the possibility that there will be a resurgence of Zika this summer. The virus has caused many travel-related cases in the U.S. and some locally acquired cases in Florida and Texas. Fauci said other concerns for the Trump administration include the potential for a new influenza pandemic and outbreaks of diseases that are not yet on anyone’s radar.” [Emphasis added.]
Fauci went on as he does every at such affairs. He can’t keep his mouth shut or his wallet closed when it comes to pandemics.
“What about the things we are not even thinking about?” he asked. “No matter what, history has told us definitively that [outbreaks] will happen because [facing] infectious diseases is a perpetual challenge. It is not going to go away. The thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years.”
Again, so I don’t get in trouble with Google and Facebook censors, I repeat that when this story was reported in just a few media outlets last year, it was found factual by USA Today fact checkers.
Here’s what they concluded: “Our ruling: True.”
“The claim that Dr. Anthony Fauci, in 2017, warned the Trump administration of the likelihood of an infectious disease outbreak is TRUE based on our research. Fauci did not warn about the coronavirus specifically, as some posts claim, but rather, that a more general ‘surprise infectious disease outbreak’ would take place.”
Yes, he didn’t admit he collaborated on the specific COVID-19 with the Chinese – he just said there was “no doubt” there would be a “surprise infectious disease outbreak” during Trump’s years. And boy what a doozy it was – well-timed too.
Who was it that said “truth is stranger than fiction”?
As I write earlier this week, it’s high time for Fauci to lose his high-paying government job and face the consequences.
MHProNews note: to the points previously raised about the Oligarchs, Big Tech, and Big Media, consider this from the WND NewsCenter.
By Bob Unruh
Published May 25, 2021 at 11:20am
The investigative reporters at Project Veritas on Monday released a video featuring confirmation from two Facebook insiders who described the Big Tech giant’s secret plan to censor comments about the COVID vaccines.
“The company has set up a tier system to rank comments on various scales, based on how much the statement questions or cautions against the COVID-19 vaccination,” Project Veritas reported.
The issue is Facebook’s attempt to “police ‘Vaccine hesitancy’ (VH) through surreptitious ‘comment demotion,'” the report said.
Based on details provided by the insiders, Project Veritas explained Tier 2 of the plan represents “Indirect Discouragement” of getting vaccinated, and those statements would be heavily “suppressed.”
“It doesn’t matter if the comments are true, factual or represent reality. The comment is demoted, buried and hidden from view of the public if it clashes with this system,” Project Veritas reported.
According to one insider, “It doesn’t match the narrative. The narrative being, get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out.”
Project Veritas obtained “multiple internal documents” detailing the plans, including information on an algorithm test being run on 1.5% of Facebook and Instagram’s nearly 3.8 billion users.
Its goal, Project Veritas explained, was to “drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments.”
Facebook said, “We proactively announced this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.” But Project Veritas said the response “failed to address our biggest questions regarding transparency.”
One of the Facebook documents explains, “We aim to identify and tier the categories of non-violating content that could discourage vaccination in certain contexts, thereby contributing to vaccine hesitancy or refusal. We have tiered these by potential harm and how much context is required in order to evaluate harm.””
It continues to explain that the agenda was developed because of “concerns that exposure to, interaction with, or production of that content can negatively impact these drivers (in other words, creating barriers to vaccination).”
The company’s solutions to language it opposes including options to “remove at scale,” “remove on escalation,” demotion and more.
The company calls “vaccine interference” “Coordinating (statements of intent, calls to action, representing, supporting or advocacy) OR depicting, admitting to, or promoting interference with the administration of a vaccine, including an event, group, page, account, etc. dedicated to this purpose.”
The company’s stated options for language it cannot tolerate editorially include “remove.”
The chain of command flows down from founder Mark Zuckerberg, who notoriously contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to election officials during the 2020 presidential race with strings attached – local officials were ordered to allow leftist organizations to “help” with the election.
It goes to Facebook “research scientist” Amit Bahl, whose job is on the “Core Data Science Team.”
MHProNews notice: Keep in mind our original reporting on the Civic Alliance, which includes Facebook, in discerning the above.
In what follows below, MHProNews knows numbers of individuals who have been vaccinated, as well as others that say they never plan to get the vax jab. Facts are what they are, and the full story of the efficacy and side effects of these perhaps mislabeled vaccines may not be fully known for some years. Note that WND NewsCenter cited Dr. Joseph Mercola, and other medical and health care whistleblowers which MHProNews has previously referenced too.
Facts are whatever they are, but that is part of the problem in modern America. Discerning the truth apart from the propaganda is not easy.
By Joel S. Hirschhorn
Published May 26, 2021 at 7:16pm
Every day more data surface on deaths and other ill effects from COVID-19 vaccines – not that most people would know this if they depend on mainstream and corporate social media for pandemic information. In collusion with governments, big media don’t provide daily headlines and data on the ill effects of COVID vaccines. This is necessary to protect the strategy settled on over a year ago.
As clear as the daily statistics of harm are, the root reason for all the obfuscation requires honest and painful analysis of what the U.S. and global pandemic strategy is all about. So, here goes.
Starting in early 2020, powerful people, government agencies and private sector entities coalesced around a pandemic strategy. Evil globalists were active behind the scene as the world was mesmerized by a wildly spreading viral pandemic. This strategy was never explicitly and publicly described. It could not be … because it was sinful.
It explicitly accepted that millions of people would die until the strategy could be fully implemented. Loss of lives was necessary to ensure that trillions of dollars would eventually be made – a classic case of profits over people. The pandemic was seen as a marketing bonanza for big drug companies, a global financial opportunity of epic historic proportions. Public health was sacrificed at the altar of corporate greed.
The most charitable interpretation of the strategy is that vaccine proponents envisioned a life-saving pandemic solution eventually. But the race to invent and produce COVID vaccines, as we now know, did not produce thoroughly tested and safe vaccines. Now we have unsafe experimental vaccines. And the truth about them must be hidden from public view. Otherwise, the truth would cause the collapse of the entire public health pandemic effort. Faith in governments would melt away as the public realized they were akin to guinea pigs in a vast global experiment.
Here is the five-part malicious and perhaps criminal strategy:
- First, block wide use of early and cheap home/outpatient protocols proven in early 2020 to cure and prevent COVID infection. Access to generics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin had to be choked. The pandemic had to boil and create consumer demand for vaccines.
- Emphasize contagion controls until vaccines became produced in large quantities. Pushing lockdowns, masking and other fear-inducing and liberty-crushing government mandates would help build eventual public acceptance of vaccines as pandemic salvation.
- Profit from a huge interim market for personal protective materials and equipment, such as ventilators, that would be needed as hospitals coped with large numbers of ill people – an inevitable result from the lack of using treatment protocols, which keeps people out of hospital, and the ineffectiveness of contagion controls.
- Meet the public thirst for a pandemic solution by a mass marketing campaign, strong government coercion and big media cooperation for use of new – but still experimental – COVID vaccines.
- Hold back advocating for blood testing to verify natural immunity obtained by being infected with the virus. Doing so could greatly reduce interest in being vaccinated by probably one-third of the U.S. population that do not need artificial immunity and whose receiving of a vaccine might pose health hazards. Interestingly, vaccine testing excluded those who had been infected by the COVID virus.
Now, here is information on COVID vaccine ill effects.
The esteemed Dr. Peter McCullough has recently said that “if this were any other vaccine it would have been pulled from the market by now for safety reasons.” This is the reality for the COVID vaccines: As of May 7, there have been 192,954 adverse-event reports associated with COVID vaccines reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), including 4,057 deaths. Previous studies, including one from Harvard University, estimate that only 1 to 10% of all vaccine-related ill effects get reported to VAERS. In other words, there are probably more people dying from the COVID vaccines than has been reported. Importantly, as to informed consent, people receiving the vaccine are not told about the CDC data.
For comparison: There are 20 to 30 deaths reported every year to VAERS related to the flu shot. That’s with 195 million receiving flu shots, far more than COVID vaccine use to this point.
Dr. Joseph Mercola said the vaccine actually is gene editing, which impairs your body’s natural immune response. “They are going to kill more people with this vaccine than deaths caused from SARS-CoV-2,” he said.
Here is what Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a prominent German virologist, has pointed out regarding his vaccine concerns:
- The vaccine was not tested on individuals that are most likely to die of the coronavirus: elderly people with pre-existing conditions;
- test subjects were “young, healthy people”;
- half of subjects had fever, chills, muscle aches, aching limbs, headaches, and they felt sick;
- a gene-altering messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine is still unknown scientifically and medically;
- vaccines can contribute an adverse overreaction to subsequent naturally occurring infections;
- there is the possibility of autoimmune disease.
French virologist and 2008 Nobel Prize winner in medicine Dr. Luc Montagnier has called mass COVID vaccination “unthinkable” and a historical blunder that is “creating the variants” and leading to deaths from the disease. He says it is “a scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake.” Many epidemiologists know it and are “silent” about the problem, Montagnier said.
Yale professor Dr. Harvey Risch revealed recently that the majority of people now coming down with COVID-19 have been vaccinated against the virus. Front line clinician Dr. Brian Tyson has agreed with this. This should raise concerns about the wisdom of getting vaccinated. It is consistent with the careful language from the government that COVID vaccines help prevent serious health impacts and deaths only.
Indeed, fully vaccinated people can get reinfected with COVID, known as breakthrough infections. According to CDC, as of April 30, around 10,000 Americans had developed these, out of 100 million vaccinated people. But the breakthrough data may be a serious under-count.
Israel has been praised for having the highest vaccination rate per capita in the world. The Israeli People’s Committee reported in April that there have been 1,000-1,100 deaths in proximity to COVID vaccination and a total of 2,066 adverse events. Noted was the absence of media coverage of the ill effects of vaccination. The report concluded: “Never has a vaccine injured so many!” Note that the population in Israel approaches just 9 million, making the level of vaccine negative impacts very significant.
An action that merits public support is a lawsuit brought by America’s Frontline Doctors against the government to block COVID vaccination in children. This makes perfect sense because CDC data has always shown that children have no significant health risks from COVID.
To sum up, betting everything on a successful vaccination program is the cornerstone of what secretly became the global pandemic strategy. To make the “plandemic” successful it was necessary to block as widely as possible the use of cheap, effective early treatment protocols, with no chance for the public to decide whether this tradeoff was acceptable. Now, over 500,000 American lives have been lost unnecessarily and probably over 3 million worldwide because of this wait-for-the-vaccine strategy.
MHProNews note: in the wake of these revelations, White House Resident Joe Biden says he will push for an investigation of the origins of the disease. Thus, the relevance of this next WND NewsCenter report. The Biden family connections to China and the oligarchs cannot be overlooked or forgotten.
By WND Staff
Published May 26, 2021 at 11:14am
An investigation into the origins of the novel coronavirus pandemic that was launched late in the Trump administration by then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was shut down by the Biden administration, according to senior State Department officials who spoke to CNN.
CNN noted the existence of the investigation and its abrupt end “comes to light amid renewed interest in whether the virus could have leaked out of a Wuhan lab with links to the Chinese military.”
CNN’s sources said the investigation by Pompeo and was an “honest effort to probe what many initially dismissed: that China’s biological weapons program could have had a greater role in the pandemic’s origin in Wuhan.”
It was being run mostly out of the State Department’s arms control and verification bureau, the report said. It was shut down when Biden officials raised questions about the findings.
“Sources involved in the Trump-era inquiry rejected criticisms over the quality of their work and told CNN their objective had been to examine scientific research and information from the U.S. intelligence community which backed the lab leak theory and shone more light on how it could have emerged in the lab,” the report said.
The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology got sick with COVID-like symptoms in November 2019 and sought hospital care.
Both Pompeo and President Trump had discussed evidence that supported a leak from the Wuhan lab, which had received a $600,000 subgrant from the U.S. overseen by Biden medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci.
CNN sources said one focus of the short-lived investigation was whether the “lab leak” was in any way connected to China’s biological weapons program. The subject was reviewed under the State Department’s ordinary review of countries’ compliance with arms control treaties.
CNN cited critics who said they didn’t like the investigation because it was being done in relative secrecy.
One former State Department official told CNN: “They basically conducted it in secret, cutting out the State Department’s technical experts and the Intelligence Community, and then trying to brief certain senior officials in the interagency on their ‘tentative conclusions’ even before they’d let the department leaders they worked for know an investigation was underway at all.”
An unnamed source said the investigation was “just fishing” to justify pre-determined conclusions. Then-Assistant Secretary Chris Ford recommend caution regarding the findings of the investigation.
“Pompeo put out a statement as the Trump administration was leaving office that said the U.S. had determined collaboration between the Wuhan lab where Covid-19 research has been conducted on bats, and secret Chinese military projects. The process behind declassifying the intelligence in that statement took weeks, and certain details were scrubbed from the final version which was put out, sources familiar with the process told CNN. The State Department’s small group looking into the lab leak theory contributed to that fact sheet, but most of its information came from the U.S. intelligence community, sources told CNN,” the report said.
The Biden administration has insisted that the World Health Organization, which already has conducted a joint investigation with Beijing concluding the pandemic had a natural origin, should lead a new, more thorough probe.
Against this backdrop, several things should be considered. In no particular order of importance, are these previously published items. They include COVID related concerns, but also items that arguably grew out of the COVID scheme. Those items often have Bill Gates – and by extension, Warren Buffett Bucks – fingerprints on them. Notice that as useful as the snapshot above has been, the reports and analyses that follow provide evidence that should have been obvious at the time. Indeed, it was to some, but not to much of the media, big tech, and their corporate and political allies.
The Masthead said at the top that we would conclude with remedies and solutions. Clearly, political engagement is necessary. Yes, there may be frustration on the part of Trump voters and others over the still increasing claims of “massive” voter fraud in the 2020 election. At a minimum, these events were used to manipulate voters in a way that aimed to oust President Trump from office. The answer is not to stop voting. Rather, the answer will include eternal vigilance and more voting. Additionally, current lawmakers and honest public officials must be pressed to investigate and prosecute these issues.
WND thoughtfully published this news-analysis by L. A. “Tony” Kovach, which is reproduced with the WND NewsCenter permission.
Published May 11, 2021 at 7:16pm
Anyone who thinks Big Tech will be reined in by regulations has not been paying close attention. The following cases exposed years of documented corporate, regulatory and accounting failures. They spotlight massive corruption and mainstream media misses.
· VW “Diesel-Gate”
· Bernard “Bernie” Madoff
· Lehman Brothers
· Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (Government Sponsored Enterprises/GSEs).
Collectively, that list involved hundreds of billions of dollars in losses by investors. Various types of fraud, corruption and deception occurred. Because taxpayers and the broader economy were impacted by Lehman Brothers and GSEs housing-finance scandals, those cost Americans trillions of dollars.
John Kenneth Galbraith said: “Regulatory bodies, like the people who comprise them … become, with some exceptions, either an arm of the industry they are regulating or senile.” Bingo.
Modern robber barons are dominating information and capital. Cold Fusion’s documentary about the Theranos’ scandal observed: “It’s the illusionary effect where if you repeat a lie enough times people start to believe it, especially if you have credible names surrounding the product.”
Problematic products are from corrupt companies.
Theranos’ Elizabeth Holmes is shown with then Vice President Joe Biden and President Barack Obama. In the massive Enron scandal, Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling are shown with then President George W. Bush (R). Those establishment politicians are sufficient to make the point of the “illusionary effect” of “repeating a big lie enough times” when “credible names” are involved.
Harry Markopolos and his colleagues spent years trying to get public officials and mainstream media to expose the massive Bernie Madoff fraud they knew existed. Forbes says Madoff losses may have exceeded $50 billion.
Other regulatory failures are hiding in plain sight. The New York Times quoted Warren Buffett: “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”
Buffett’s “class” profited wildly in the 2008 and 2020 economic upheavals. How? CNBC quoted billionaire Bill Gates: “I didn’t even want to meet Warren because I thought, ‘Hey this guy buys and sells things, and so he found imperfections in terms of markets, that’s not value added to society, that’s a zero-sum game that is almost parasitic.'”
The CDC defines parasitic: “A parasite is an organism that lives on or in a host organism and gets its food from or at the expense of its host.”
Buffett said, “The most important thing for me is figuring out how big a moat there is around a business. What I would love, of course, is a big castle and a big moat with piranhas and crocodiles.”
When carefully examined, these oligarchs and their businesses employ “parasitic” “moat” and “sabotage monopoly” methods. They create a slow-motion monopoly of various markets. Experts like James Schmitz say monopolies “inflict great harm on low- and middle-income Americans.”
The solution? Enforce existing laws. Break these pernicious giants up. They cause social, economic and moral harm. Once broken up, watch the economy and America soar.
It is increasingly evident that the propaganda crafted images of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are not in tune with carefully observed reality. Early on, MHProNews and our MHLivingNews sister site called these troubling tycoons out, based on facts and evidence. Those earlier reports are now also coming into sharper focus, as Gates has been among those protecting Fauci and this web of propaganda.
Why did Gates do so? Because, said Robert F. Kennedy Jr., he was going to profit from it – and did profit from it. When Gates profits, it is common that Buffett does too. These are not nice people. To apply Buffett’s own maxim against them is the right thing to do, based upon the evidence.
At some 9,100 words, that may seem like a lot to digest. But as a longtime reader observed, it is easier to get people to read what is in an article than to get them to click on a related link to get the same information. That means that it is better to lay out as much as possible in one report, and then provide the links that help those thirsting for truth to learn more.
These facts and evidence are also necessary to grasp. Because America and our profession are at a dangerous crossroad. This writer previously admitted to having being misled to some extent by the powers that be in our profession. But as tips, evidence, and research made it possible, MHProNews laid out the facts and evidence as it emerged. That is what honest journalists are supposed to do.
As we previously reported, Buffett is a self-professed atheist. Gates claims to be Catholic, but has said himself that his faith does not influence how his professional decisions. What kind of Catholic or Christian is that? That is the very definition of CINO – Catholic in Name Only, or Christian in Name Only.
In a land that has numerous examples of what the Capital Research Center calls “Deception and Misdirection,” it is all the more important to plug into and stay in touch with sources that strive to tell it like it is. Freedom is never free, said President Ronald Reagan. Good information is necessary for a free people said President John F. Kennedy. There are voices across the left-center-right willing to say what is, rather than repeat the lies of those who would subvert our society for their own benefit. Count on MHProNews and MHLivingNews to shed light on reality. Because only the truth – then coupled with right action – can set people free.
Stay tuned for more of what is ‘behind the curtains’ as well as what is obvious and in your face reports. It is all here, at the runaway largest and most-read source for authentic manufactured home “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (Affordable housing, manufactured homes, reports, fact-checks, analysis, and commentary. Third-party images or content are provided under fair use guidelines for media.) (See Related Reports, further below. Text/image boxes often are hot-linked to other reports that can be access by clicking on them.)
By L.A. “Tony” Kovach – for MHProNews.com.
Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing.
For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.
This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position, and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.
Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/latonykovach
The text/image boxes below are linked to other reports, which can be accessed by clicking on them.