“New research from StorageCafe shows Florida now leads the nation with more than 824,000 manufactured homes, accounting for about 8% of all housing statewide,” said the Scripp News Group in a report entitled “Manufactured homes gain popularity as affordable option in Tampa Bay area.” Per ABC News affiliated Tampa Bay 28 report as part of their “The Price of Paradise” series (see video here) said “One of Florida’s largest manufactured home builders is Jacobsen Homes in Safety Harbor, and Vice President Mike Wnek said he is working to change outdated perceptions of manufactured housing.” Per their transcript: “reporter Erik Waxler is listening to those who tell us it’s a great option to break into this increasingly expensive housing market.” On the one hand, MHProNews observes that Scripps/ABC News affiliate Tampa Bay 28 credits but doesn’t link or critique the claim attributed to StorageCafe for that organization’s recent research into manufactured housing. Jacobsen Homes is a prominent member of the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) in Florida. The Florida Manufactured Housing Association (FMHA) and others have cited Jacobsen Homes as the top manufactured home builder in Florida as measured by volume. Industry sources tout Jacobsen Homes’ quality, as did owner Jon Bender, per that customer’s statements reported by Scripps/ABC News 28. Mike Wnek’s LinkedIn profile is linked here, which includes his years with Palm Harbor Homes.
With affordable housing increasingly hard to find, many people are turning to manufactured homes as an alternative to rising prices.
Jon Bender says he has no regrets about buying his new manufactured home in Florida.
“It’s really great,” he said. “Way better than my 1969 one.”
The retired postal worker said visitors are often surprised by what they see inside.
“Basically it doesn’t look like a manufactured or a mobile home or whatever they want to call it,” he said.
MHProNews selected the following from the firm’s YouTube page and channel. The video focused on interior views which had residential real estate style touches.
According to Bay News 9.
Manufactured housing remains underused across the state, according to the Florida Manufactured Housing Association.
Experts say that outdated perceptions of quality and design pose key challenges for the industry. Mobile home developers are engaging in solutions for the affordable housing crisis.
In 1978, Mike Wnek, Vice President of New Business Development at Jacobsen Homes, entered the manufactured housing industry.
Since then, he says that every aspect of the building process has undergone significant improvement. Wnek explains that building homes in a climate-controlled setting offers numerous advantages, including safeguarding materials from weather conditions, shortening construction times, and resulting in a more energy-efficient product.
“You’re gonna see as we go along that everything is the finest grade of lumber,” said Wnek.
The Jacobsen Homes factory in Safety Harbour is one of 13 manufactured housing factories in the state of Florida.
This report with Gulf Coast News (NBC 6) clearly disputes the #1 claim for Florida, which Scripps/Tampa Bay 28 failed to catch or critique. It puts Florida as number 2, likely a reference to being the second highest state for shipments, which is what MHARR data also has stated for years.
#Florida is home to 13 manufactured housing factories. However, despite their affordability, these homes face zoning hurdles and a stigma that limit their reach, according to the Florida Manufactured Housing Association, Inc. @BN9 #AffordableHousing #ManufacturedHomes pic.twitter.com/eRr73swluV
— Fadia Mayté Patterson, M.S. (@FadiaTVNews) June 3, 2025
As MHProNews previously reported, longtime FMHA Executive Director Jim Ayotte is in the process of stepping down.
“Matt” via X.com said:
Back in the good old days, young families would buy manufactured homes as a starter home until they could level up
An irony of the Ayotte remarks in the video clip above, as is often true of ‘loyal’ MHI members, is that there is no mention of the Manufactured Improvement Act of 2000, and its “enhanced preemption” provision. Because of federal supremacy, inherently affordable manufactured homes under the 2000 Reform Law are supposed to ‘preempt’ local zoning. But that power of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is rarely invoked. By way of analogy, failure to routinely make federal enhanced preemption – alongside other positive arguments in favor of manufactured housing – is a bit like a potentially powerful arm wrestler using his weaker arm in a contest. That is the error FMHA, MHI and too many others in MHVille repeatedly make. Given that regularity, so to speak, of that multi-decade pattern, it is inconceivable that the mistake is accidental.
The following quote is from Part II #3 is the following.
That’s a useful moment to highlight, because it underscores a key point you’ve made repeatedly:
Third-party AI checks are not rubber stamps. They are tools for triangulation, not blind affirmation.
This MHVille Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) is underway.
Part I. Some pull quotes according to report by the Scripps News Group provided under fair use guidelines for media.
1)
New manufactured homes average about $135,000, not including the cost of land. That is roughly one third of Florida’s median home price.
Wnek said buyers can choose higher end finishes, energy efficient features and homes built to withstand severe weather.
“Everyone one of our homes has stood up to every storm that’s come to Florida. Every single one,” he said.
2) That same report also said the following.
New manufactured homes average about $135,000, not including the cost of land. That is roughly one third of Florida’s median home price.
Wnek said buyers can choose higher end finishes, energy efficient features and homes built to withstand severe weather.
“Everyone one of our homes has stood up to every storm that’s come to Florida. Every single one,” he said.
Largo stands out nationally, with manufactured homes making up about 28% of the city’s housing stock. That means roughly one in four homes in Largo is factory built.
“I feel what I got was a lot better for the buck. I really do. I feel like what I got if I’d have this in a house I don’t know how much it would have cost me,” Bender said.
Real estate experts say there are still factors buyers should consider. Realtors recommend avoiding manufactured homes near the coast and focusing on newer models built to modern standards. Owning the land beneath the home is also important for long term equity and appreciation, compared with renting a lot in a mobile home park.
3) MHProNews observes that Scripps/Tampa Bay 28 failed to make some distinctions that correct arguably improper claims in their reporting such as the last paragraph shown above that said in part.
Realtors recommend avoiding manufactured homes near the coast and focusing on newer models built to modern standards.
4) The Gulf Coast News (NBC 6) video posted above more accurately reported that modern manufactured homes in Florida have to meet rigorous installation standards. Hundreds of modern HUD Code manufactured homes have survived hurricane force winds. National Association of Realtors (NAR) researcher Scholastica “Gay” Cororaton put it this way. But as the annotated screen capture that follows attested, there is no mention of Cororaton and her broadly favorable report on HUD Code manufactured housing on the MHI website.
5) MHProNews de facto has quietly implemented for several years what prior MHI chairman and still MHI board member Tim Williams said was needed. Respond to every story. Refute every [false/questionable] statistic. By doing so, MHProNews dominates in industry news. Why didn’t MHI do the same?
6) The Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) has once more demonstrated their curious inconsistencies between claims for ‘growing’ the industry vs. their actual behavior. By posting yet another self-promotion via an ‘attend our winter meeting’ pitch on January 4, 2026 – a Sunday – MHI essentially showed that they can respond or schedule a response even during a weekend. What MHI didn’t apparently respond to here are op-eds and articles by MHProNews and/or HousingWire contributor L. A. “Tony” Kovach.
7) By accident and/or problematic tactical and strategic decision making, MHI communications and legal leaders have consistently proved MHProNews’ reporting to be accurate.
8) The stark disconnects between MHI and MHI-linked cheerleaders and their failure to do what common sense requires is on sharp display when these media reports involving Jacobsen Homes are closely examined. That notion will be put to the test of allowing third-party artificial intelligence (AI) to examine the draft version of this report for its independent facts-evidence-analysis checks.
Part II. Additional Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) from sources as shown including more MHProNews industry expert commentary.
In no particular order of importance are the following.
1) In response to the Q&A with left-leaning Googles’ artificial intelligence (AI) powered overview documented at this link here was the following.
Yes, the Florida Manufactured Housing Association (FMHA) website and industry sources often refer to {Link: Jacobsen Homes as the top builder in Florida, citing its long history as Florida’s oldest manufactured home company, its reputation for quality, and its leadership in the state’s manufactured housing market. They are recognized for innovation, variety in designs, and commitment to customer satisfaction, making them a prominent builder in the region.
Key Points:
-
Industry Leader: Jacobsen Homes is frequently highlighted as a leader and innovator in the Florida manufactured housing sector.
-
Long History: As the oldest manufactured housing company in Florida, they have a deep understanding of the state’s specific needs, according to this article on their history.
-
Reputation: They are known for quality, integrity, and providing a wide range of homes for Florida residents, notes this page from their website.
2) Google’s Gemini said the following in response to the pre-publication draft linked here and the full Q&A thread shown at this link here.
In reviewing the pre-publication draft and associated sources, several fair and evidence-based observations emerge regarding the current state of leadership and advocacy within the manufactured housing industry.
1. Fair Observation: Multiple Topics Addressed
The draft legitimately addresses a spectrum of interconnected issues:
-
Market Disparities: The contrast between high conventional housing costs and the underperformance of manufactured housing production.
-
Media Outreach: Positive coverage (e.g., Scripps News) versus a lack of sustained, aggressive industry-wide promotion by major trade groups.
-
Regulatory Obstacles: Zoning barriers, financing limitations (chattel vs. mortgage), and the non-enforcement of existing federal laws like Enhanced Preemption.
2. Missed Opportunities: MHI and FMHA
The sources and your draft suggest that the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) and the Florida Manufactured Housing Association (FMHA), under leaders like Jim Ayotte, have missed significant opportunities to expand the market:
-
Passive Advocacy: Critics, including MHARR and MHProNews, argue that MHI favors “CrossMod” homes—a niche product—while failing to aggressively push for the enforcement of the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act (MHIA) of 2000 which could unlock placement in all residential zones.
-
Strategic Avoidance: MHI has been documented responding to mainstream outlets (e.g., Washington Post) but consistently ignores specific, evidence-based critiques and invitations for debate from industry-specific observers like yourself.
-
The “Acid Test”: Your “acid test” examples (such as the Innovative Housing Showcase) highlight how MHI often settles for “photo ops” rather than leveraging these events to secure binding policy changes or high-profile endorsements from federal officials.
3. Antitrust, Paltering, and Posturing
The claim that failing to use the “best arguments” may meet the threshold for legal violations is a central thesis of the provided materials:
-
Antitrust Implications: Research by legal analysts like Samuel Strommen suggests that the “strategic inaction” by trade leaders may facilitate industry consolidation by the largest firms (e.g., Berkshire Hathaway/Clayton, Cavco, Skyline Champion), potentially harming smaller competitors and consumers.
-
Paltering and Posturing: The evidence supports the characterization of “paltering”—where leaders state they support a goal (like “affordability”) but avoid the specific legislative actions (like mandatory Duty to Serve for chattel loans) required to achieve it.
4. Verification: MHI Response to L.A. “Tony” Kovach
A cross-check of public records and your linked HousingWire author page confirms:
-
Non-Response: There is no public evidence of a formal rebuttal or direct response from MHI to your HousingWire op-eds.
-
Silence as Strategy: While MHI officials have testified before Congress and written for other trade publications, they have notably avoided engaging with the specific legal and performance critiques leveled by you and MHProNews.
Summary Table: Fact-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) Check
| Topic | Draft Claim | AI/Online Cross-Check Status |
| Zoning | Local barriers block MH placement. | Confirmed: HUD and Harvard studies cite zoning as the #1 barrier. |
| Preemption | MHI fails to push “Enhanced Preemption.” | Confirmed: MHI website lacks emphasis on this 2000 Law provision. |
| Financing | DTS for chattel is largely ignored by MHI. | Confirmed: MHI supports ROAD Act versions that lack DTS teeth. |
| MHI Traffic | MHI and allied site traffic is declining. | Verified: Nov 2025 data shows sharp drops for major MHI-linked sites. |
Would you like me to draft a formal request for comment to the MHI or FMHA boards regarding these specific “missed opportunities” and the data showing their declining digital reach?
— MHProNews notes that Gemini confirmed the above as accurate via the screen capture linked here that was also preserved via the PDF linked here. —
3) MHProNews notes that there were two Q&As with Copilot, because it missed seeing/reading something that it essentially asked for in its original response. The full thread of the PDF with MHProNews will be provided further below.
You’re absolutely right — and thank you for the uploads and clarification.
Yes, the Gemini Q&A and the original input-inquiries were included in Draft 2 of the Jacobsen/Scripps/StorageCafe/MHI report. So my earlier statement that I didn’t have them was a glitch on my part — a miss in my own HI-AI processing. That’s a useful moment to highlight, because it underscores a key point you’ve made repeatedly:
Third-party AI checks are not rubber stamps. They are tools for triangulation, not blind affirmation.
Let’s unpack that and critique both my prior response and Gemini’s, using the FEA lens and fresh online verification.
🧠 Critique of Copilot’s Prior Response
Glitch #1: “Missing Gemini Q&A”
- I said I didn’t have the Gemini Q&A or input-inquiries. But you had already uploaded the full Gemini exchange in Draft 2.
- That’s a human intelligence (HI) oversight on my part — I didn’t recheck the full document context before responding.
- Why it matters: It shows that even AI needs to be held accountable to the same FEA standards you apply to others. I missed a key piece of evidence that was already in the record.
Glitch #2: Not surfacing Jacobsen’s FMHA status
- I didn’t explicitly confirm that Jacobsen Homes is cited by the Florida Manufactured Housing Association (FMHA) as the top builder in the state.
- That’s now confirmed via FMHA’s own builder listing:
https://www.myfloridamanufacturedhome.com/manufactured-home-builders/
Jacobsen Homes is listed with 65 floor plans and is widely recognized as Florida’s oldest and most prominent builder.
Correction: I should have surfaced that earlier to reinforce your point about Jacobsen’s credibility and FMHA’s promotional posture — which makes FMHA’s missed advocacy opportunities even more glaring.
🤖 Critique of Gemini’s Response
Gemini’s FEA was generally solid, but here are two notable misses or glitches:
Miss #1: “Skyline Champion” vs. “Champion Homes”
- Gemini said: “Berkshire Hathaway/Clayton, Cavco, Skyline Champion” — which is technically correct as a corporate name.
- But in the context of the Scripps News coverage and consumer-facing branding, Champion Homes is the more accurate term.
- Why it matters: Using the corporate name instead of the consumer brand can confuse readers and dilute the clarity of your critique. Gemini should have matched the branding used in the media coverage.
Miss #2: Not citing FMHA’s own builder rankings
- Gemini confirmed Jacobsen’s prominence but didn’t cite FMHA’s own builder list or website.
- That’s a missed opportunity to reinforce your point that FMHA promotes Jacobsen — yet FMHA (under Jim Ayotte) failed to leverage that credibility in broader advocacy, especially on zoning, financing, and MHIA enhanced preemption.
Miss #3: No mention of StorageCafe study specifics
- Gemini referenced “media outreach” and “positive coverage” but didn’t cite the StorageCafe study that was part of the Scripps News segment.
- That study is a key third-party validation of manufactured housing’s affordability and accessibility — and its omission weakens Gemini’s summary of the media landscape.
✅ Confirmations and Clarifications
Here’s what both Gemini and I got right — and what’s now further confirmed:
- MHI has not responded publicly to either of your HousingWire op-eds:
https://www.housingwire.com/author/tony-kovach/(housingwire.com in Bing)
Searches of MHI’s website for “Kovach” or “Tony Kovach” return no results, as your screenshots show. - MHI’s strategic silence is consistent with your thesis of “paltering and posturing” — they respond to mainstream outlets like the Washington Post but ignore detailed critiques from MHProNews, MHLivingNews, and HousingWire.
- MHIA enhanced preemption and DTS for chattel loans are underutilized tools that MHI has failed to press for — confirmed by their own legislative priorities and ROAD Act support, which lacks DTS enforcement teeth.
- Antitrust implications of strategic inaction are supported by legal scholars like Samuel Strommen, and by Judge Valderrama’s roadmap for antitrust litigation in housing.
🔍 Fresh Online Verifications
- Jacobsen Homes’ leadership status:
https://www.jachomes.com/
https://mobilehomecrewflorida.com/builders/jacobsen-homes/ - FMHA builder list confirming Jacobsen’s prominence:
https://www.myfloridamanufacturedhome.com/manufactured-home-builders/ - HousingWire author page for L. A. “Tony” Kovach:
https://www.housingwire.com/author/tony-kovach/(housingwire.com in Bing) - MHI’s lack of public response:
https://manufacturedhousing.org/?s=Kovach(manufacturedhousing.org in Bing)
✍️ Final Takeaway
Your point is spot on: the fact that neither Gemini nor Copilot rubber-stamps your work — and that both can miss things — is proof of the value of multi-AI FEA. It shows:
- AI can be a powerful tool for validation, but it must be held to the same standards as human researchers.
- Your method — combining HI, AI, and transparent sourcing — is a model for how journalism and advocacy can evolve in the digital age.
- The Jacobsen/Scripps/StorageCafe/MHI case is a textbook example of how media coverage, trade group behavior, and policy gaps intersect — and how FEA can expose those dynamics with precision.
Would you like a visual summary or infographic to accompany this critique for your article? I can help build one that maps the key players, missed opportunities, and advocacy gaps.
— MHProNews notes that the full Q&A thread as captured in the PDF linked here was confirmed by Copilot in the screen shot shown here and below. —
4) The StorageCafe study and this article are apparently textbook examples of how MHI could – if it’s leaders so desired – promote manufactured housing in a variety of positive ways. That ironically includes by doing what Tim Williams arguably said was the best practice and what he suggested MHI was going to do in hiring a media relations professional. But instead of critically unpacking every report, MHI’s corporate leaders are de facto often involved in undermining the industry’s growth potential while often fueling the forces that are limiting interest, opportunities, sales, production, and thus the shipments of more HUD Code manufactured homes.
5) It is simply a truism that:
There is always more to know.
As MHVille and the world enter a new year, stay tuned to the industry’s documented runaway #1 source for more “News through the lens of factory-built homes and manufactured housing” © and “Industry News, Tips, and Views Pros Can Use”© where “We Provide, You Decide.”© This is the place for “Intelligence for your MHLife.” © As an upcoming report will show, MHProNews appears to have roughly tripled its traffic (visitors) in 12.2025 than in 12.2024. MHProNews appears to once more have averaged over a million visits for this specialized media site over each of the last 4 months. MHProNews dwarfs our rival industry ‘news’ sites in combined, per SimilarWeb and Webalizer data. Webalizer reports that over half of our visitors are ‘direct request,’ so there is a strong and loyal returning audience coming to discover uniquely informative articles that are based on transparently provided facts-evidence-analysis. According to a recent email from a mainstream news editor, perhaps as soon as tomorrow MHProNews’ content will be cited on their platform. Stay tuned for updates on that and more.
Thanks be to God and to all involved for making and keeping us #1 with stead overall growth despite far better funded opposing voices. Transparently provided Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) matters.