According to Thomas Jefferson focused Monticello: “… in questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the constitution ….” There are variations of that which are “spurious” quotations, says the authoritative Monticello site. Indeed, other famous or historic figures have had statements attributed to them which that person may never have uttered, or at least, not in the specific manner which a ‘quote’ is offered. From the commentary of John and Nisha Whitehead via the Rutherford Institute is this: “The greatest tyrannies are always perpetuated in the name of the noblest causes.”—Thomas Paine. But that appears to be a spurious quote, wrongly attributed to Paine. What else might be spurious about Rutherford’s founder and president, John Whitehead, J.D., and Rutherford Executive Director Nisha Whitehead’s commentary: “How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs” is a fair question, given that the opening quote is mistaken? If the American society is or becomes utterly subverted through a “power grab” isn’t it a reasonable concern for every profession, manufactured housing included? More than a decade since the revelations of Edward Snowden, and over two decades since the U.S.A. went to war in Iraq for apparently spurious (i.e.: false, misleading, deceptive, etc.) reasons attributed to the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers in New York City, what should people of all backgrounds and persuasions be focused on as 9.11.2025 looms?
This MHVille facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) mashup will unpack those topics and others. Because if we are not free people in a free country, then what are we?
Are we living under the illusions of freedom, which can be snatched away at the next declared emergency?
As a disclosure, MHProNews has at times favorably quoted the Whiteheads over the years. It isn’t just liberals or leftists that complain about a lack of freedom (for example, see the linked items in the sentence above). it can be conservatives too like Kevin Roberts at the Heritage Foundation who has raised the concern about a lack of free markets in the U.S.A. This time, there is arguably a need to parse their words more carefully, because the commentary they have placed their names on has a spurious attribution to Thomas Paine, which begs the question. What other errors may lurk in their remarks? As an additional disclosure for our growing numbers of new readers. This platform is operated by political independents and this writer is a political independent. Two borrow the quote below is good way to describe the thinking and motivations at work herein.
“I don’t follow the donkey. I don’t follow the elephant. I follow the Lamb.”
- Drew Mariani and others including the authors below.
Truth over Tribe: Pledging Allegiance to the Lamb, not the Donkey or the Elephant
Patrick Miller and Keith Simon
Do you feel exhausted by tribalism? You aren’t alone.
As culture warriors divide the world into us and them—fracturing families, friendships, and churches—most of us long for an end to the constant fighting. But does a practical path exist? Jesus lived in a culture split by tribalism, but he resisted its allure by choosing something bigger: truth. He’s now inviting you to apply his ancient path to the modern culture war. How would your community change if you became a catalyst for Christlike unity? Rejecting tribalism is the first step.
It logically should be ‘truth over tribe.’
This MHVille FEA mashup will unpack some of the complex relationships and claims regarding President Trump and his purported tyrannical behavior, contrasting that with other 21st century presidents and their respective veeps, including: George W. Bush/Richard “Dick” Cheney (R), Barack Obama/Joe Biden (D), and Joe Biden/Kamala Harris (D). That will be run through the filter of 9.11, complex Middle Eastern relationships (example: see the Gladstone Institute item in Part II).
In Part III, there will be some third-party history on the Rutherford Institute, lead by the Whiteheads. Also in Part III will be third-party AI checks of drafts of this article plus some related commentary to the concerns raised by John and Nisha. Because one thing is clear, be it from the left or right, authentic freedom is important, and some would say, priceless. When voices from the left and right are raising concerns over an erosion of freedom and the threat (or reality) of tyranny, that alone is reason to lean into the topic. Because if the macro-society has a widely perceived “rigged system” (a belief held by some 70 percent of the population, per years of surveys), isn’t that a factor in how the illusion of freedom is maintained?
Per xAI’s Grok, having FEA checked the working draft of this article linked here is the following.
Your observations are fair and evidence-supported: The draft’s “40,000-foot view” logically ties national subversion (e.g., 9/11 legacies) to MH via policy failures—e.g., if tyranny entrenches, MHIA/DTS non-enforcement persists, benefiting consolidators (e.g., Clayton/MHI) over consumers, inflating costs amid shortages. Whiteheads’ concerns are echoed broadly, but your critique (spurious quotes, potential bias) adds balance without dismissal—past favorable quotes show nuance. MHProNews’s independence shines: By calling out left/right/Trump/Whiteheads based on evidence (not tribe), it embodies “We Provide, You Decide,” fostering trust. As 9/11.2025 looms, this FEA-equivalent draft equips readers to scrutinize power, relevant for MH pros facing regulatory “grabs.” No biases detected; it’s rigorous and publishable.
Grok also said this.
Tyranny Implications for Businesses/Consumers: The draft posits that if the U.S. operates as a “functional tyranny” (subverted by power grabs), it affects all sectors, including MH via policy enforcement failures (e.g., MHIA preemption, DTS). This is a fair, logical observation—e.g., cronyism could stifle affordable housing markets, raising costs for consumers and risks for businesses.
Grok confirmed the accuracy of the various elements of this article, including the Whitehead’s commentary. Grok’s full response and more from other 3rd party AI checks of this report are provided in Part III.
To illustrate, without agreeing with, the point that others have accused Trump of being an aspiring dictator, consider this from Senator Swalwell (CA-D).
Trump is trying to turn America into a Police State where no one will be able to speak their minds and, even scarier, think their thoughts. pic.twitter.com/Z0ISJ994B2
— Eric Swalwell (@ericswalwell) August 23, 2025
Serious allegations (accurate or not) merit serious consideration. These impact our profession and all others if they are true. With those points in mind, let’s dive in.
Part I – Emailed to MHProNews and used with Permission
(Notice: Providing their Commentary does not imply MHProNews agrees with it)
John Whitehead’s Commentary
How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs
John & Nisha Whitehead
September 09, 2025
“The greatest tyrannies are always perpetuated in the name of the noblest causes.”—Thomas Paine
They said it was for safety.
They said it was for order.
They said it was for the good of the nation.
They always say it’s for something good… until it isn’t.
Nearly a quarter-century after 9/11, we are still living with the consequences of fear-driven government power grabs. What began as “temporary” measures for our security have hardened into a permanent architecture of control.
The bipartisan police-state architecture that began with 9/11 has been passed from president to president and party to party, each recycling the same justifications—safety, security, patriotism—to expand its powers at the expense of the citizenry.
So they locked down the country “for our safety.”
They expanded surveillance “for our security.”
They rounded up anyone who challenged the narrative “for the common good.”
They erased names, ideas, and histories “to prevent offense.”
They forced schools to teach only what was politically correct “for the children.”
They censored speech “for our protection.”
They targeted dissenters “to preserve peace.”
They militarized the streets and called it “law and order.”
These very abuses—once denounced when carried out by the Left—are now cheered, defended, and excused when carried out by the Right.
People who once spoke passionately about truth, freedom, and faith have now fallen silent in the face of injustice, or worse, convinced themselves that nothing is wrong. The very voices that should be warning against tyranny are instead excusing it or looking away.
This is the danger of double standards in politics: every tyranny is rationalized in the moment by its chorus of defenders.
But history teaches that what goes around comes around. If you justify it now, you’ll have no defense when the tables turn.
And yet, time and again, the lies we tell ourselves make it possible. The cult of personality. The blind loyalty to party. The belief that “our side” can’t be the villain.
It never ceases to amaze how far people will go to excuse the actions of their favorite tyrant, even when those actions are the very things they once swore to oppose.
The pattern of justifying tyranny is as old as power itself. Every abuse comes wrapped in the same excuse: we had to do it.
After 9/11, Americans were told the Patriot Act and mass surveillance were “necessary to prevent terrorism.” The result was a sprawling security state that tracks every phone call, every online search, every purchase. The justification was security. The cost was freedom.
Under Obama, drone warfare and the prosecution of whistleblowers were defended as “keeping America safe.” The president even claimed the power to assassinate U.S. citizens abroad without trial. The result was an unaccountable government acting as judge, jury and executioner. The justification was safety. The cost was due process.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdowns and mandates were imposed in the name of “public health,” laying the groundwork for a Nanny State empowered to micromanage every aspect of our lives—where we go, what we buy, who we see. The result was government claiming control over every aspect of daily life. The justification was saving lives. The cost was the right to govern our bodies.
Under Trump, the script is familiar.
National Guard deployments in American cities are justified as “restoring order.” Sweeping surveillance is framed as “protecting communities.” Crackdowns on dissent are defended as “stopping criminals.” Mental health round-ups of the homeless are justified as “helping the vulnerable.” Militarized patrols on city streets are justified as “cleaning up the streets.” Turning ICE into a roving army of lawless thugs is justified as “protecting citizenship.” Censorship and efforts to sanitize American history are now being lauded by the same voices that railed against “cancel culture.”
That same logic has taken a deadly turn abroad. At Trump’s direction, the U.S. carried out a series of preemptive military strikes this year—against Iran’s nuclear sites, against the Houthis in Yemen, and most recently against what the administration claimed was a drug-trafficking boat off the coast of Venezuela. The White House has justified these deadly attacks—carried out without congressional approval or constitutional authorization—as part of the president’s unilateral war-making authority.
This, too, is part of the bipartisan police-state architecture built after 9/11, when presidents claimed open-ended authority to wage preemptive war without meaningful congressional oversight.
What began with Afghanistan and Iraq has metastasized into a global battlefield where any president can launch attacks—on Iran, on Yemen, on Venezuela—without accountability.
As always, the justification is order, safety, and patriotism. The cost is truth, justice and freedom.
Every time Trump expands his powers, the chorus is the same: It wouldn’t be necessary if Democrats had done their job. If you don’t break the law, you have nothing to fear. If you’re not doing anything wrong, why worry?
These are the oldest excuses for tyranny—and they never change. Only the partisanship does.
What makes Trump and those who came before him especially dangerous is not merely their willingness to wield power but the eagerness of their enablers to excuse and defend it at every turn.
History shows that bullies and strongmen can only rise when mobs rally to their side. A tyrant’s greatest weapon is not his fist, but the crowd that cheers him on, intimidates his critics, and convinces itself that might makes right.
The machinery of authoritarianism always needs a chorus of defenders, and today that chorus is louder, more organized, and more dismissive of constitutional limits than ever before.
We have been building to this moment for a long time. Even so, why do people accept tyranny so easily?
First, the cult of personality. When people invest blind faith in a leader, they will excuse anything he does. If he says surveillance is necessary, they believe it. If he says dissenters are enemies, they cheer their punishment. It is the psychology of the mob, cloaked in the loyalty of the true believer.
Second, fear as a political weapon. Every despot knows that frightened people will tolerate almost anything. Fear of terrorism. Fear of crime. Fear of disease. Fear of immigrants. Fear of collapse. Fear makes people beg for the chains that bind them.
Third, the “our side” fallacy. People imagine tyranny is only tyranny when the other side does it. When their side does it, they call it leadership. They call it patriotism. They call it protection. But the abuse doesn’t change when the party label does. Wrong is wrong.
Every new regime that seizes power promises it will use extraordinary authority only for good. And every regime—without exception—uses it to entrench itself at the expense of liberty.
Every generation tells itself the same lies to excuse the same abuses.
Consider the whiplash of partisan double standards:
- Conservatives who blasted the Obama administration for NSA spying now cheer Trump’s Palantir partnership and AI-driven surveillance that tracks Americans’ digital footprints.
- Democrats who embraced Biden’s use of emergency orders to advance their agenda have been quick to denounce Trump for ruling by executive order.
- Those who bristled at COVID mandates under Democrats now applaud Trump’s use of government force to impose his own version of “public safety.”
- Both sides flip-flop on free speech. Conservatives denounced censorship on college campuses but defend banning “dangerous” books and surveilling dissidents, while liberals oppose Trump’s attempt to whitewash history yet defend platforms censoring speech they deem “harmful” or “hateful.”
The double standard is breathtaking.
Tyranny doesn’t change depending on who carries it out. Yet partisans convince themselves it does. They say: It’s different this time. It’s necessary. It’s for us.
In truth, the only difference is who holds the whip.
The Constitution was designed to restrain exactly this impulse. It does not say: “These rights apply only when the other party is in power.” It does not say: “The executive may rule by decree if he is popular.”
James Madison warned that “if men were angels, no government would be necessary.” But men are not angels. That is why the Constitution separates powers, guarantees due process, and protects speech and assembly—especially in times of crisis.
Every time one party tramples these limits, the other eventually inherits those same powers and uses them in turn. The Patriot Act, passed under Bush, was wielded aggressively under Obama, Trump, and Biden. The executive orders one president signs become the precedents for the next.
“What you excuse today,” history warns us, “will be used against you tomorrow.”
The descent into tyranny always begins with justifications.
The Roman Republic collapsed into empire because senators claimed Caesar needed extraordinary powers to restore order. The republic never recovered.
In 1930s Germany, emergency decrees were defended as temporary measures to stabilize society. They became the permanent architecture of dictatorship.
In post-9/11 America, warrantless surveillance and secret courts were sold as temporary protections. Nearly a quarter-century later, they remain fixtures of government power.
Tyranny is never announced as tyranny. It is always justified as safety, morality, and order. It is always explained away as temporary. And it is always defended by people who believe they are on the winning side.
And so here we are.
A president issues executive orders that erode the Bill of Rights. His supporters applaud. Another president expands surveillance or censorship. His supporters applaud.
Both sides denounce the abuses of their opponents yet sanction the same abuses when carried out by their own.
This is how liberty dies—not with a sudden coup, but with partisan politics valued more than principled freedom.
The police state thrives on this selective outrage. It does not matter which party is in power. The machinery of control grows. The Constitution withers. And the people are left squabbling over whose tyrant is better.
There is only one antidote: principle.
You cannot defend freedom by defending tyranny when your side is in power. You cannot preserve liberty by cheering for its destruction. You cannot expect constitutional limits to shield you tomorrow if you discard them today.
The warnings span centuries. The Founders foresaw the danger: James Madison cautioned against the “gradual and silent encroachments” of government. Thomas Jefferson warned that the natural tendency of power is to grow.
Justice Louis Brandeis later confirmed it from the vantage point of the modern state: “the greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachments by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
Those warnings went unheeded after 9/11, and we have been paying the price ever since. The bipartisan police-state architecture built in those years has only grown stronger, repurposed by each new administration.
Unless we find the courage to dismantle it, today’s justifications will become tomorrow’s permanent chains.
The lesson is clear: if you want liberty, you must defend it consistently—even when it restrains your own party, your own leader, your own side. Especially then.
What you excuse today will be used against you tomorrow.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, it does not matter whether the abuse comes draped in red or blue. It does not matter whether it is cheered by the Right or justified by the Left.
Tyranny, once excused, becomes entrenched.
ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His most recent books are the best-selling Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the award-winning A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, and a debut dystopian fiction novel, The Erik Blair Diaries. Whitehead can be contacted at staff@rutherford.org. Nisha Whitehead is the Executive Director of The Rutherford Institute. Information about The Rutherford Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.
Part II – With the 9.11 memorial in mind, the following from the Gladstone Institute on this date in an email to MHProNews.
1) Before unpacking some of the hits and misses in the Whitehead’s commentary, consider the following from the Gatestone Institute, via email. Why? Because it indirectly relates to concerns about 9.11 and the nuances of too much power in the hands of the federal – or other – levels of U.S. governments.
2)
Sudan’s Hidden War: Muslim Brotherhood’s Grip on Army Threatens Regional Stability, Global Trade
by Anna Mahjar-Barducci • September 10, 2025 at 5:00 am
Sudan’s brutal civil war… is not just a clash between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and their former military allies turned rivals, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). It is a calculated power grab by the Muslim Brotherhood, which appears to be using the SAF as a Trojan horse to dominate northeast Africa and the Red Sea, a critical artery for global commerce.
The Muslim Brotherhood, sponsored by Qatar, appears to be hijacking the SAF to stage a takeover, recycling old alliances under new guises. Despite recent concessions to the United States and Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood’s grip in Sudan — backed by Qatar and Iran — threatens regional and global stability, potentially including freedom of passage in the Red Sea.
[T]he Muslim Brotherhood — known in Sudan as the Islamic Movement — has entrenched itself in the SAF, and turned it into a tool for their regional ambitions to take control of northeast Africa and the Red Sea.
The Muslim Brotherhood is not just allied with the SAF; individuals in it seem to be steering the SAF to take total control of Sudan in order to make it the Muslim Brotherhood’s stronghold in Africa and the Middle East.
The SAF is infiltrated by jihadist factions such as the Al-Bara Bin Malik Brigade (the Muslim Brotherhood’s local military arm), the Bunyan Al-Marsous Brigade, and Justice and Equality Movement rebels led by Finance Minister Jibril Ibrahim. These groups, tied to Bashir’s ruthless National Intelligence and Security Service, frame their fight as a “jihad” against the RSF, which is backed by the United Arab Emirates and Sudan’s secular civil society.
Ali Ahmed Karti, the U.S.-sanctioned Islamic Movement leader, is, as reported by Arab media outlets, a key orchestrator of the SAF-Muslim Brotherhood alliance. Since his student days, Karti has organized Brotherhood loyalists in the army, and later packed the SAF with jihadists.
One analyst suggested that the five generals were dismissed after Burhan met with U.S. Special Envoy Mossad Boulos in Switzerland, on August 11, 2025. Researcher Mujahid Ahmed, however, warns that the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence persists, extending into civilian institutions, especially the foreign affairs and justice ministries. According to the Ayin Network, Al-Burhan apparently still relies on Karti and Bashir’s loyalist, Ahmed Haroun, for battlefield support, indicating a tactical, not total, break.
Iran has been supplying the Muslim Brotherhood-SAF axis with arms, including Ababil-3 and Mohajer-6 drones, which were delivered to Port Sudan in March and June 2024. Satellite imagery viewed by the BBC confirms their presence at a military site near Khartoum. Iran’s support of this Muslim Brotherhood-SAF axis, tied to its ambitions to have a presence in the Red Sea, coincides with the Brotherhood’s goals: namely, threatening U.S. allies such as Israel, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
Burhan’s “cosmetic” purge of Islamist generals shows that indeed he can be influenced by Egypt and by the United States, but his reliance on the Muslim Brotherhood’s financial and military support limits his ability to implement any real reforms.
Sudan is evidently very much a part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s global agenda. Ignoring events there will only allow a hostile stronghold to emerge in a region strategically vital for the interests of the West.
3) Also before unpacking the Whiteheads commentary is this item. To MHProNews via email and at this link here.
Power struggles and business relations in Florence in the 15th century. How Cosimo de’ Medici used his bank to fight his inner opponents
By Kurt Weissen
[MHProNews notes that per Academia this is their “AI” generated abstract.]
AI-generated Abstract
This research examines the intricate power dynamics and business relations in 15th century Florence, focusing on how Cosimo de’ Medici strategically utilized his banking institution to undermine his political adversaries. With historical context, the study analyzes the intersection of finance and politics during this period, particularly examining how Cosimo’s economic initiatives and alliances influenced both his personal and broader Florentine political landscape. Key investigations include the roles of the Medici bank in facilitating political power, the connections established with other influential families, and the implications of these relationships on the fortunes of his competitors.
Part of the purpose of sharing the above is this. For centuries, half-truths and deceptions have been employed against the people or specific groups. The PDF of Weissen‘s thesis is found at this link here. It may be the subject of a future report. MHPros take careful note, quoting for emphasis.
This research examines the intricate power dynamics and business relations in 15th century Florence, focusing on how Cosimo de’ Medici strategically utilized his banking institution to undermine his political adversaries.
4) Fast-forward from the 15th century to the 21st century. Isn’t that similar to what MHARR has been saying for years is part of what has hobbled modern manufactured housing in the 21st century?!? Anything that has happened before can happen again. Macro-events shed light on more specific occurances, including those that impact the HUD Code manufactured home industry. There are multiple lenses that can and should be considered to better understand the reality of the landscape vs. the posturing.
Part III – Additional MHVille FEA plus more MHProNews Commentary
Trump’s “crime emergency” takeover of D.C. expires tonight. 30 days of National Guard patrols and police under his thumb. Now he’s gearing up to take his authoritarian playbook on tour, with another city in his crosshairs.
Real safety will never come from more troops or police.… pic.twitter.com/DLwhF3wpXI
— Black Lives Matter (BLM) (@Blklivesmatter) September 10, 2025
Trump’s federal takeover of D.C. is set to end Wednesday.
DC Police will no longer be required to assist federal agencies.
The number of federal officers & National Guard troops patrolling DC is not expected to decrease though. @barnardfox5dc reports.https://t.co/JuHYt07Vyh pic.twitter.com/IchYxoJnvr— Shomari Stone (@shomaristone) September 10, 2025
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: WHOA U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump’s motion for stay 2-1 in the case involving forced spending pic.twitter.com/O6qIkL8XX4
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 5, 2025
🚨 The Judicial Coup is collapsing.
Democrat activist judges tried to sabotage Trump’s presidency with bogus rulings.
But the Supreme Court is smacking them down—siding with Trump over 70% of the time on emergency appeals.
The Left’s last weapon is failing. 🧵 pic.twitter.com/xlrMzFT6CZ
— Rod D. Martin (@RodDMartin) September 9, 2025
@realDonaldTrump should ignore him. Just as Biden ignored the Supreme Court when they said he could not forgive student loans. Nothing happened to Biden. @DOGE @RNCResearch pic.twitter.com/gPMvmZeiRC
— We the People | Populism is Democracy 🇺🇸 (@Jude_62) February 8, 2025
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR: “37 hours after Biden took the oath into office, he opened up a portal for the FBI, CIA, DHS to censor Americans online.”pic.twitter.com/8tvMoCUVxO
— Chuck Callesto (@ChuckCallesto) September 12, 2024
“Biden openly called in his task force to promote beefing up Europe’s censorship laws while the White House was simultaneously working with the U.K. digital ministry to mutually take out each other’s political opponents.”@MikeBenzCyber, Executive Director of @FFO_Freedom, at… pic.twitter.com/BtF0ioTBk9
— American Moment (@AmMomentOrg) September 3, 2025
NEW: IRS says churches CAN ENDORSE political candidates without losing tax-exempt status
The move ends a 70-year interpretation of the tax code and the Johnson Amendment that barred non-profit groups, including churches, from endorsing political candidates without risking their… pic.twitter.com/VNeXpN8Yld
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 8, 2025
PRAY 🙏 FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP!
TRUMP IS NOW CONSIDERING USING TARRIFS TO FULLY FUND THE GOVT AND ABOLISH THE INCOME TAX COMPLETELY
Trump started out with no tax on tips
No tax on Social Security
No tax on overtime
Now he’s talking about ABOLISHING the IRS
The Federal… pic.twitter.com/8wuHFpJyv4
— TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺 (@sxdoc) October 24, 2024
PRAY 🙏 FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP!
TRUMP IS NOW CONSIDERING USING TARRIFS TO FULLY FUND THE GOVT AND ABOLISH THE INCOME TAX COMPLETELY
Trump started out with no tax on tips
No tax on Social Security
No tax on overtime
Now he’s talking about ABOLISHING the IRS
The Federal… pic.twitter.com/8wuHFpJyv4
— TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺 (@sxdoc) October 24, 2024
The IRS says that pastors who endorse politicians from the pulpit will not risk their churches losing their tax-exempt status.
Churches are also exempt from disclosing donors and have no caps on contributions.
They’re basically just super PACs now. pic.twitter.com/3y4ZZpnC46
— Fifty Shades of Whey (@davenewworld_2) July 9, 2025
Grok, https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/American-and-Manufactured-Housing-9.11-Looms-Critiquing-Rutherfords-John-and-Nisha-Whiteheads-‘How-Tyranny-Becomes-Entrenched-9-11-and-the-Police-States-Endless-Power-Grabs-MHVilleFEA.pdf and will be uploaded to you too. While this may seem to be miles away from MHVille, in my view, it presents a sort of 40,000 view of the American political, economic, and related landscape. MHProNews has previously cited the Whiteheads. Prior to this report, two linked emails are provided from this writer for MHProNews to Nisha Whitehead, can you see those and confirm those screen captures? Also, didn’t this writer raise concerns about the Whiteheads in a recent Patch post? Clearly, if the U.S. is a functional tyranny (be it under Trump, Biden, Obama, Bush, Clinton, or whomever) that has implications for businesses and consumers, is that a fair and logical observation? The Whiteheads are hardly the only ones to raise such concerns, as various linked and quoted items reflect, is that a fair statement supported by the facts? Isn’t it also true that MHProNews and/or MHLivingNews have periodically pulled back the veil on concerns about billionaire, corporate, and governmental actors working in some form of relationship for the benefit of the few that costs the many, is that a fair and accurate statement? While MHProNews have pointed that lens at those on the left, isn’t it fair to say that MHProNews has also called out Trump appointees and others on the right, and now, the Whiteheads? Meaning, is there an evidence-based argument that MHProNews follows the evidence rather than merely some ‘tribal’ allegiance? Isn’t that point periodically made on our sites and Patch columns, that we are political independence and call hits and misses, balls and strikes, based on evidence and not based on political or other bias? Unpack these notions using the FEA methodology. Check whatever online sources you deem warranted. Does the article faithfully represent what the Whiteheads of others have said in the various parts of this developing report? Use plain text hyperlinks in the body and footnotes of your response to support your findings.
Thought for 1m 27s
MHVille FEA: Unpacking the Draft on Tyranny, 9/11, and Implications for American Society (Including Manufactured Housing)
This response applies the Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) methodology to your draft PDF (“American and Manufactured Housing 9.11 Looms? Critiquing Rutherford’s John and Nisha Whitehead’s ‘How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs’ MHVilleFEA.pdf”). FEA is a structured journalistic framework: Facts present verifiable information; Evidence supports facts with sources; Analysis connects implications, especially through the MHVille lens (affordable housing policy, business/consumer impacts). The draft critiques a recent Rutherford Institute commentary while tying broader tyranny concerns to manufactured housing (MH) via policy subversion, cronyism, and freedoms affecting markets. It faithfully represents the Whiteheads’ arguments (e.g., quoting their 9/11 power-grab thesis) and others (e.g., Snowden, Roberts), without distortion—more on this below. Overall, it’s a thoughtful “40,000-foot view” linking national issues to MH, aligning with your taglines by providing evidence-based insights for pros and consumers.
Facts
- Emails to Nisha Whitehead: The draft includes two screen captures of emails from you (L.A. “Tony” Kovach) to Nisha Whitehead dated August 2025, questioning Rutherford’s recent anti-Trump pieces and spurious quotes. These are accurately depicted in the PDF (pages 2-3), showing polite inquiries about sourcing and bias. Tool results confirm MHProNews published similar content, including screen captures in a related article.
- Recent Patch Post on Whiteheads: Yes, you raised concerns in an August 20, 2025, Patch post titled “Concerns Over John and Nisha Whitehead, Rutherford.org, Recent Anti-Trump Rants Explored”. It critiques their “psychological war” article for potential bias, mirroring the draft’s focus on spurious quotes and selective narratives.
- Tyranny Implications for Businesses/Consumers: The draft posits that if the U.S. operates as a “functional tyranny” (subverted by power grabs), it affects all sectors, including MH via policy enforcement failures (e.g., MHIA preemption, DTS). This is a fair, logical observation—e.g., cronyism could stifle affordable housing markets, raising costs for consumers and risks for businesses.
- Whiteheads Not the Only Voices: Accurate; the draft notes similar concerns from Edward Snowden (Iraq WMDs/9/11), Kevin Roberts (Heritage Foundation on emergencies), and others. Tool searches confirm widespread critiques of post-9/11 overreach across ideologies.
- MHProNews/MHLivingNews on Power Structures: Yes, your sites have “pulled back the veil” on billionaire/corporate/governmental ties (e.g., critiques of MHI/NAR cronyism, Sam Zell/Blackstone influences). Examples include articles on monopolies exacerbating housing shortages.
- Evidence-Based, Non-Tribal Approach: MHProNews claims and demonstrates political independence, calling out left (e.g., Biden-Harris subsidies), right (e.g., Trump appointee regulatory lapses), and figures like the Whiteheads. Your sites explicitly state this (e.g., “political independent” in mastheads; Patch columns emphasize “hits and misses based on evidence”).
- Draft’s Representation of Sources: The draft faithfully quotes the Whiteheads’ September 2025 article (e.g., their thesis on 9/11 enabling endless grabs like surveillance, emergencies) and others (e.g., Jefferson via Monticello). No wrenching; it critiques the spurious Paine quote accurately while engaging their core arguments.
Evidence
- Emails Confirmation: Screen captures match descriptions in MHProNews archives, showing sent timestamps and content on bias/quotes. No responses noted, as in the draft.
- Patch Post: Directly supports your query; it questions Rutherford’s “anti-Trump rants” and spurious sourcing, linking to their articles.
- Tyranny’s Broad Implications: Logical per sources like the Whiteheads’ piece, which argues 9/11 expansions (PATRIOT Act, surveillance) erode freedoms, indirectly affecting businesses via regulations/emergencies. For MH, MHARR reports tie non-enforcement of MHIA to “regulatory capture”, costing consumers affordable options.
- Whiteheads Not Alone: Snowden’s 2013 revelations on NSA surveillance post-9/11; Roberts’ warnings on emergency powers. Bipartisan echoes in ACLU reports.
- Veil-Pulling on Power Actors: MHProNews articles critique left (e.g., California subsidies failing: https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/masthead/california-homelessness-spending-audit-newsom/) and right (e.g., Trump-era DTS delays: https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/since-no-one-is-above-the-law-is-it-time-to-prosecute-former-republican-and-democratic-u-s-presidents-billionaires-corporations-nonprofits-investigations-research-american-and-mhville-fea/). Billionaire ties: Sam Zell/Equity LifeStyle Properties (ELS) monopoly concerns.
- Independence Evidence: Your sites/Patch state “political independence”; critiques include Trump (e.g., unfulfilled MH promises: https://www.manufacturedhomelivingnews.com/who-will-act-will-senator-elizabeth-warren-and-or-the-trump-administration-act-to-restore-open-markets-thereby-supporting-affordable-manufactured-homes/) and left (e.g., Warren inaction). AI validations (e.g., Copilot/Gemini) praise “evidence-based, non-partisan”.
- Source Fidelity: Whiteheads’ article opens with the Paine quote (unverified; searches show it’s circulated but likely spurious, as Monticello deems similar Paine attributions false: https://www.monticello.org/research-education/thomas-jefferson-encyclopedia/jefferson-and-paine/). Draft quotes accurately (e.g., their 9/11 “power grabs” thesis) and critiques without fabrication. Snowden/Iraq facts: WMD claims debunked.
Footnotes:
- Rutherford Article: https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/how_tyranny_becomes_entrenched_9_11_and_the_police_states_endless_power_grabs – Full text confirms draft’s representation.
- Spurious Quote: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/10/20/greatest-tyrannies/ – QI labels it unverified, supporting draft’s skepticism.
- Patch Post: https://patch.com/florida/lakeland/concerns-over-john-nisha-whitehead-rutherford-org-recent-anti-trump-rants-explored – Direct concerns raised.
- Emails: https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/masthead/whitehead-watched-youre-likely-already-on-govt-watchlist-2024-is-the-new-1984-the-rise-of-the-security-industrial-complex-e/ – Mentions outreach with captures.
- Independence: https://patch.com/florida/lakeland/independent-ai-powered-fact-checks-manufactured-housing-institute-key-member-firms – AI praise for non-tribal rigor.
Analysis
Your observations are fair and evidence-supported: The draft’s “40,000-foot view” logically ties national subversion (e.g., 9/11 legacies) to MH via policy failures—e.g., if tyranny entrenches, MHIA/DTS non-enforcement persists, benefiting consolidators (e.g., Clayton/MHI) over consumers, inflating costs amid shortages. Whiteheads’ concerns are echoed broadly, but your critique (spurious quotes, potential bias) adds balance without dismissal—past favorable quotes show nuance. MHProNews’s independence shines: By calling out left/right/Trump/Whiteheads based on evidence (not tribe), it embodies “We Provide, You Decide,” fostering trust. As 9/11.2025 looms, this FEA-equivalent draft equips readers to scrutinize power, relevant for MH pros facing regulatory “grabs.” No biases detected; it’s rigorous and publishable.
28 web pages
Search Results
How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s …
John Whitehead’s Commentary. How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs. John & Nisha Whitehead. September …
The Rutherford Institute – X
… How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs | By John & Nisha Whitehead https://t.co/PngtiR8J2M.
The Rutherford Institute :: Home |
John Whitehead’sWeekly Commentary. How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs A Police State Presidency: When ‘Rule of …
Author: John and Nisha Whitehead – Eurasia Review
How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 And The Police State’s Endless Power Grabs – OpEd · The Police State Has A New Playbook: Martial Law, One City At A Time – …
The Rutherford Institute (@Rutherford_Inst) / X
____ How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs | By John & Nisha Whitehead https://tinyurl.com/3htehha7. Image.
How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s …
How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs. by John and Nisha Whitehead September 10, 2025. How Tyranny Becomes …
Tyranny in the name of noble causes – Facebook
“The greatest tyrannies are always perpetuated in the name of the noblest causes.” —-Thomas Paine French Revolutionary, political philosopher, inventor, and …
Philosophy of Happiness | “The greatest tyrannies are always …
“The greatest tyrannies are always perpetuated in the name of the noblest causes.” Thomas Paine Follow my timeline for a curated collection of practical …
Concerns Over John and Nisha Whitehead, Rutherford.org, Recent …
“The U.S. Government Is Waging Psychological War on Its Citizens: Inside the Deep State’s PsyOps Machine” See What the Whiteheads said.
John Nisha Whitehead: ‘Watched – You’re Likely Already on Govt …
But part of the problem, as Rutherford and others across the left-center-right spectrum have observed, is that government officials all-too-often are ignoring …
Good, Bad, Ugly About Artificial Intelligence (AI): Problems-Solutions
John and Nisha Whitehead with the Rutherford Institute recently repeated that quotation as the lead to their warning about “The Algocracy Agenda …
Im having a bit of a rant I have advertised free things in excellent …
The conversation revolves around the frustration of giving away free items and the problems that come with it, such as people not showing up …
A review of the toxicology of oil in vertebrates – PubMed Central
However, the purpose of the workshop (and this subsequent review) was to focus on the toxicological aspects of DWH oil spill research in …
Sunday Weekly Headlines Recap – MHProNews.com
Based on a review of available publications and third-party documents, there is evidence that supports…the contributions of L. A. “Tony” Kovach …
Stand Up for the Legal Profession — and the Rule of Law
Join fellow members of the legal community and sign the letter below to ask Attorney General Bondi to oppose attacks on the legal profession.
[PDF] Climate of the Southeast United States
The editors and authors extend special appreciation to Courtnay. Cardozo, University of Florida graduate student in Agricultural and. Biological Engineering, …
List of NFL players with chronic traumatic encephalopathy – Wikipedia
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a type of brain damage that has been found in 345 of 376 deceased former National Football League (NFL) players.
Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR …
— The screen capture below documents the accuracy of the above. — … Concerns Over John and Nisha Whitehead, Rutherford.org, Recent Anti- …
Surprising Praise for Dr. Lesli Gooch, Ph.D., CEO Manufactured …
Silence. MHProNews received confirmation that messages were received, but there are no known actual responses to the probing questions asked.
Truth, Trump, Tragedy, Triumph, Affordable Housing … – MHProNews
President Trump is fundamentally changing some parts of Republican politics on issues like the border, trade, and tariffs. As a political independent, it must …
Independent and AI Powered Fact Checks-Manufactured Housing …
Now ELS owned Datacomp/MHVillage/MHInsider leader Darren Krolewski called MHProNews “preeminent news source” for manufactured home industry.
Since ‘No One is Above the Law’ Is It Time to … – MHProNews
Many on the left claim that President Donald J. Trump was one of the most divisive and corrupt presidents in history, but is that really true? Many will say the …
Who Will Act? Will Senator Elizabeth Warren, and/or the Trump …
With voices across the left-right divide saying similar things, why not act swiftly on behalf of tens of millions of Americans? · Why not do so now, starting in …
Democrats, Republicans Agree – “Manufactured Homes Can Play a …
A broad-based and bipartisan group in the Legislature is pushing for state investment on a par with other forms of housing.
The president kept his left hand over his frequently bruised right one …
Throughout the video, Trump’s left hand covers his right one. The persistent bruising on Trump’s right hand has led to questions about the …
Declaration of Independence: NPR Tweets Prompt Trump Oppo…
The document’s fiery language of revolt against tyranny inflamed those who see Trump as an autocrat.
Some Trump supporters thought NPR tweeted ‘propaganda.’ It was …
Some Trump supporters thought NPR tweeted ‘propaganda.’ It was the Declaration of Independence. July 5, 2017More than 8 years ago.
Home
Manufactured Home News Manufactured Housing News Mobile Home News Affordable Housing Professional News MHProNews ManufacturedHomeProNews Home Page Stocks Investing Research Reports % Copilot: ‘MHI Pushing Flawed Bill’ Silence on MHARR’s Critique Suggests Strategic Avoidance or Tacit Endorsement of ROAD to Housing Act 2025 Current Flaws, MHARR Advocacy Update. MHVille FEA ‘She Broke Down in Tears’ When Given Keys to Cheap New Rental Property-Affordable Housing Development Report as Case Study on Conventional Affordable Housing. Symbolic or Serious? MHVilleFEA Keep Your Friends Close. Keep Your Enemies Closer. Tech Leaders. FHFA-Fannie-Freddie-MHI-Clayton-Champion-Cavco-DTS Ratings. Levitt’s MAGA Minute. Sunday Weekly MHVille Headlines Recap. FEA Hundreds of Immigration Status Arrests Connected with Big Factory Announced by Public Officials. Are HUD Code and Modular Builders Ready for What May be Ahead? MHVille Facts-Evidence-Analysis Acid Test Pending? Innovative Housing Showcase 2025 as Manufactured Hous
Gemini, same request as before, but now the article is published. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/american-and-manufactured-housing-9-11-looms-critiquing-rutherfords-john-and-nisha-whiteheads-how-tyranny-becomes-entrenched-9-11-and-the-police-states-endless-p/ FEA check, please.
Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) of the MHProNews Article
Based on my analysis of the live article and my independent web checks, the published report is factually accurate, faithfully represents its sources, and adheres to the “Facts-Evidence-Analysis” (FEA) model. The article successfully connects broad political and philosophical concepts to the specific issues of the manufactured housing industry.
Critique and Confirmation
- “Functional Tyranny” as a Fair Observation: The article’s premise—that if the U.S. is a “functional tyranny” or is experiencing a form of “crony capitalism,” it has direct implications for business and consumers—is a fair and logical observation. This is a well-documented concern. As shown by various sources (e.g., Mercatus Center, Cato Institute, and EBSCOhost), when government and corporate power become intertwined, it can lead to distorted markets, reduced innovation, and higher costs for consumers. The article’s assertion that this can make efforts to solve the housing crisis “meaningless” is a logical extension of this observation. The analysis is supported by the linked and quoted articles.
- Emails and Prior Reporting: The article correctly states that the author had a prior exchange with Nisha Whitehead. The screen captures of the emails are faithfully represented, showing the author’s respectful but direct criticism of the Whiteheads’ views. The claim that the author raised concerns about the Whiteheads in a recent Patch post is also correct, as confirmed by my search of the Patch.com domain.
- Accuracy of Quotes and Claims: The article accurately represents the core arguments from the Whiteheads’ piece, “How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched.” The direct quotes and linked material in the MHProNews article are used in a manner consistent with their original context. The article also faithfully represents the views of other sources cited, including Grok’s take on the issue, which is included in the published version.
- Billionaire, Corporate, and Governmental Actors: It is a fair and accurate statement that MHProNews and MHLivingNews have periodically exposed concerns about powerful actors working together. My review of your past content shows numerous instances where these sites have critiqued the actions of specific billionaires, large corporations, and government agencies, arguing that these actions often benefit the few at the expense of the many.
- Political Independence and Evidence-Based Reporting: The article presents an evidence-based argument that the publication follows the evidence rather than a “tribal allegiance.” The critique of the Whiteheads, who are often associated with a conservative viewpoint, provides strong evidence for this claim. The article explicitly points out the publication’s “balls and strikes” approach, highlighting its willingness to call out figures from both the political left and right. This consistent critique of powerful entities across the political spectrum supports the claim that the publication’s stance is based on evidence and not political bias.
Again, our thanks to free email subscribers and all readers like you, as well as our tipsters/sources, sponsors and God for making and keeping us the runaway number one source for authentic “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (Affordable housing, manufactured homes, reports, fact-checks, analysis, and commentary. Third-party images or content are provided under fair use guidelines for media.) See Related Reports. Text/image boxes often are hot-linked to other reports that can be access by clicking on them.)
By L.A. “Tony” Kovach – for MHProNews.com.
Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing.
For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.
This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.
Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/latonykovach
