“Paying off a competitor to stop competing against you is a violation of federal antitrust laws,” said Daniel Guarnera, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. “Zillow paid millions of dollars to eliminate Redfin as an independent competitor in an already concentrated advertising market—one that’s critical for renters, property managers, and the health of the overall U.S. housing market. The FTC will do our part to ensure that Americans who are looking for safe, affordable rentals receive all the benefits of robust competition between internet listing services like Zillow and Redfin.” See that in its full context in the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) press release provided by MHProNews in Part I. According to @lindawalshaw1797: “I am CEO of a non-profit assisting mobile homeowners in California. FYI: The federal government (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac) are helping these monopolies, billionaires, equity investors buy up MORE and MORE parks (on the theory that it “preserves affordable housing,” which is does NOT) rather than helping mobile homeowners to buy the land and preserve their parks.” Linda Walshaw is indeed the CEO the San Diego Seniors Community Foundation. A report they have published on the topic of “disappearing” “mobile home parks” as a form of affordable housing is linked here. Walshaw’s quote plus others posted that are paraphrased in the headline are found in context in Part III. From CBS 6/Click Orlando is this: “According to The Federal Trade Commission, the Sherman Act bans any unfair contracts or conspiracies that restrain trade. This includes price-fixing, dividing markets or rigging bids,” (see Part II). CBS 6/Click Orlando said they contacted Datacomp, owned by Equity LifeStyle Properties (ELS) – both of which are members of the Manufactured Housing Institute. Per their reporting, Datacomp failed to respond to the allegations in the national class action suit their report cited. The two topics the FTC press release on the Zillow-Redfin suit and the manufactured home community and related litigation may seem to be distinct, and in some ways, they are. But that is what makes this MHVille facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) report a “mashup.” The fact that the FTC is correctly saying “Paying off a competitor to stop competing against you is a violation of federal antitrust laws” while the FTC continue to waive through like a “free pass” mergers and acquisitions (M&As) and the FTC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust division fail to prosecute cases involving manufactured housing industry firms and their favored trade group ought to be a red flag. So far, there has been routine talk by Democrats and Republicans about antitrust enforcement and/or the need for more affordable housing for years. But where is the demonstrable action? When will existing federal laws be exercised that could unleash the production and job-creating power of building millions of inherently affordable homes?

 

 

Some state attorneys general have on various occasions taken legal steps with respect to certain land-lease community operators that are often members of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI). But most of those actions have, in hindsight, had little to no deterrent impact. More on that in Part IV.

There is an argument to be made that a similar principle applied to the suing Zillow and Redfin could have been applied to block the Cavco Industries (CVCO)-American Homestar deal. While the details are different, aren’t there some similar principles involved? Third-party AI will be asked that question and those results will be explored in Part IV.

Per another remark posted by San Diego Seniors Community Foundation CEO Walshaw from Part III below is this.

@lindawalshaw1797

There’s nowhere NEAR enough homeless shelters to house all the people, especially seniors, veterans, the disabled and everyone on fixed incomes, who are being priced out of housing. A group of senior residents priced out of their previous senior apartments have banded together behind a local restaurant and are living in their cars to stay safe. There’s a nurse working 2 jobs living in a grocery store parking lot . . . she’s been there 7 years. Landlords are charging applicants $150 per applicant just to fill out an application. For a family of 4, that’s $600 per application before they’re even shown the unit or confirmed that its still available. Predatory capitalism at its finest.

MHProNews notes that quoting the various sources verbatim does not necessarily imply full, partial, or any editorial agreement with the person or organization so cited herein. These are various voices and operations being cited in full context in their own voices. They are ‘primary sources’ that reveal what others are saying.

Those primary sources along with the research and reporting combination yield keen and potentially potent insights.

From the PDF of the report linked here is the following. While Orlando and San Diego are specific markets, the issues each describe are clearly national in nature, as years of reporting on these and related topics via MHLivingNews and MHProNews attest.

Quoting from “Mobile Home Parks: A Disappearing Form of Affordable Housing.”

There’s rarely a day when local newspapers do not have at least one story related to the housing crisis in San Diego County. If it is not a piece on the issues of homelessness, it is a story on the increase in rental homes that affect the neighborhood fabric. Stories abound on the lack of affordable housing, skyrocketing prices for rents and single-family homes, cities failing to meet affordable housing requirements, and communities supporting the building of higher-density housing—as long as it is in someone else’s neighborhood.

This report delves into mobile home parks—a sector of the housing network in San Diego that does not get much attention despite its role as a critical form of affordable housing. A mobile home park is defined as an area of land or property containing two or more mobile homes, manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, and/or lots for rent or lease.1 In a mobile home park, mobile homeowners own their homes and are only renting the small space upon which the home sits. In this way, mobile home park rents are more comparable to renting a parking space than
renting an apartment or other housing

While their terminology may be rather common, it is nevertheless arguably flawed. That said, looking beyond the terminology, that nonprofit research report raises relevant issues and cites potentially useful insights.

Per one of the AIs used to check the pre-publication draft of this article linked here, was the following (see Part IV for the full context).

…

This MHVille FEA is underway.

 

Part I. FTC Sues Zillow and Redfin Over Illegal Agreement to Suppress Rental Advertising Competition

Illegal deal stunts multifamily rental advertising competition, harming American renters and property managers, the FTC alleges | September 30, 2025

Today, the Federal Trade Commission sued Zillow and Redfin over an unlawful agreement that eliminates Redfin as a competitor in the market for placing advertising of rental housing on internet listing services (ILSs)—the websites that millions of Americans use to find their next rental home.

Zillow Group, Inc., and Zillow, Inc., (Zillow) and Redfin Corporation operate two of the nation’s largest rental ILS networks by traffic and revenue, including sites such as Zillow Rentals, Rent.com, and ApartmentGuide.com. The complaint alleges that in February 2025, Zillow and Redfin entered into an illegal agreement to dismantle Redfin as a competitor in the ILS advertising market for multifamily rental properties.

In exchange for a $100 million payment and other compensation from Zillow, the complaint alleges, Redfin agreed:

• To end its contracts with advertising customers and help Zillow take over that business,
• To stop competing in the advertising market for multifamily properties for up to nine years, and
• To serve merely as an exclusive syndicator of Zillow listings, making Redfin sites effectively a copy of the listings that appear on Zillow’s sites.

Zillow and Redfin framed their agreement as a “partnership,” but in reality the arrangement is an end run around competition that insulates Zillow from competing head-to-head on the merits with Redfin, the complaint states. In connection with the agreement, Redfin fired hundreds of employees, then helped Zillow to hire its pick of those terminated workers.

“Paying off a competitor to stop competing against you is a violation of federal antitrust laws,” said Daniel Guarnera, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. “Zillow paid millions of dollars to eliminate Redfin as an independent competitor in an already concentrated advertising market—one that’s critical for renters, property managers, and the health of the overall U.S. housing market. The FTC will do our part to ensure that Americans who are looking for safe, affordable rentals receive all the benefits of robust competition between internet listing services like Zillow and Redfin.”

The FTC alleges that this agreement destroys competition for multifamily rental properties advertising on ILSs, harming both property managers seeking to advertise properties for rent and renters searching for a home. The agreement also constitutes an unlawful acquisition in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, the complaint alleges.

The FTC alleges that the unlawful agreement will:

• Likely lead to higher prices and worse terms for multifamily unit advertising; and
• Reduce incentives for Zillow and Redfin to compete for renters, including through investment in attracting visitors and innovation to improve user experience when searching on an ILS for a rental property.

The complaint seeks to stop Zillow and Redfin from continuing their unlawful agreement and contemplates a potential divestiture of assets or the reconstruction of businesses to restore competition.

Throughout this investigation, the FTC worked in close collaboration with the offices of several state attorneys general. The Commission looks forward to ongoing cooperation with the states in this matter.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia was 3-0.

NOTE: The Commission issues a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The case will be decided by the court.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and to protect and educate consumers. The FTC will never demand money, make threats, tell you to transfer money, or promise you a prize. You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers, file an antitrust complaint, or comment on a proposed merger. For the latest news and resources, follow the FTC on social media, subscribe to press releases, and read our blog.

Tags: Competition | Bureau of Competition | Merger | Real Estate and Mortgages

Contact Information

Media Contact

Victoria Graham 

Office of Public Affairs

415-848-5121

—

Part II. From CBS 6 a.k.a. Click Orlando at this link here the following is provided by MHProNews under fair use guidelines for media

Lawsuit claims manufactured home park owners colluded to drive up lot rents

Legal filing accuses corporations of violating antitrust law

Lawsuit claims manufactured home park owners colluded to drive up lot rents

Mobile home residents in Central Florida face eviction risks as lot rents surge

ORMOND BEACH, Fla. – A class action lawsuit obtained by News 6 accuses nearly a dozen corporations of conspiring to raise prices at manufactured home parks.

In a lot of these parks, residents own the home, but lease the land underneath. Manufactured homes have long been an affordable housing option, but as News 6 has reported, many people are being priced out.

Ruth Koretsky, 77, moved to Shangri La, a manufactured home community in Ormond Beach, in 2019 because of the low lot rent.

“I knew what direction the mobile home parks were going in, that they were starting to increase rents and take away services,” Koretsky told News 6. “I assumed because this park was small and old that it would take a long time for that to happen here.”

Unfortunately for Koretsky, that was not the case. She told us she is currently paying nearly double what she did six years ago. Koretsky’s lot rent was about $350 when she moved in. Now, she said, she pays close to $700 because of rising rent and extra fees.

“I only lived here a year when a corporation bought this place and started raising the rent,” Koretsky said. She added that services previously included in the base rent were shifted to become additional charges: “All the things they used to pay for, they added it on to our bill.”

Shangri La is operated by Lakeshore Communities Inc., which owns and operates manufactured home communities across the United States.

Lakeshore is one of 10 defendants named in a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit, which was filed in Illinois, alleges that manufactured home park owners “coordinated with each other to increase manufactured home lot rents systemically and unlawfully by purchasing and using market reports” published by Datacomp Appraisal Systems Inc.

Datacomp, which calls itself the largest provider of manufactured home valuations, inspections and market data, is at the center of the court battle. The lawsuit claims sharing “non-public” and “competitively sensitive” information eliminated competition among park owners on price, services and quality.

“They do nothing for us. We have no amenities and they do less and less for us,” Koretsky said, describing what she sees as deteriorating service quality despite rising costs.

The lawsuit alleges the defendants violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act, a federal antitrust law.

According to The Federal Trade Commission, the Sherman Act bans any unfair contracts or conspiracies that restrain trade. This includes price-fixing, dividing markets or rigging bids.

The lawsuit details a striking shift in lot rental prices. According to the legal filing, from 2010 to 2018, lot rental prices increased by approximately 2.3% annually, closely tracking the average inflation rate of 1.8% during that period. However, the lawsuit stated, between 2019 and 2021, lot rental prices reportedly surged by about 9.1% each year, far outpacing the 3% inflation rate.

News 6 asked Lakeshore Communities, Inc., why it raised the lot rent, as well as its response to the lawsuit. The company has not yet responded to our calls and emails for comment.

News 6 also called Datacomp to get its response to the lawsuit. An individual, who identified herself as Ann on the phone, told us to send her an email, and she would send the message to the proper individuals. News 6 sent Ann multiple emails. We have not yet received a response.

—

Part III. From the CBS 6 YouTube Page as shown.

 

 

1) MHProNews has for years stressed the importance of separating the proverbial wheat from the chaff. That ancient and proven principle of separating the wheat from the chaff is illustrated as a what Walshaw called a “case in point.”

@lindawalshaw1797

Case in point: Warren Buffett owns more manufactured home parks in the U.S. than almost anyone else. But he also owns the top 5 companies who manufacture the homes and the top 10 companies who finance them (often through predatory loans containing $40K balloon payments).

That remark by Walshaw is arguably factually mistaken on several levels. It is true that Warren Buffett led Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) owns Clayton Homes (the runaway largest manufactured home producer), and some years ago, Clayton used to own dozens of land-lease manufactured home communities (MHCs) that they spun off. Berkshire also owns 21st Mortgage Corporation and Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance (VMF), sister brands to Clayton that finance HUD Code manufactured homes.  That noted, Walshaw may well have several valid points in the rest of her remarks. Her error on those points, don’t mean that everything she said was wrong or flawed. The principle she explained was fine, but the specifics used by Walshaw are in some ways mistaken.

2) MHProNews notes that among the dozens of posted comments on this YouTube video page is shown below. The ‘days’ and some thumbs, down, etc. are omitted. From the YouTube video page at this link here.  These are largely (if not entirely) in the order found at the time they were cut and paste into WORD and then into our MHProNews editing/publishing system.

 

@lindawalshaw1797

I am CEO of a non-profit assisting mobile homeowners in California. FYI: The federal government (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac) are helping these monopolies, billionaires, equity investors buy up MORE and MORE parks (on the theory that it “preserves affordable housing,” which is does NOT) rather than helping mobile homeowners to buy the land and preserve their parks.

@lynndaniels4135

It just sounds like a Ponzi scheme to me just like property taxes. Used to be the cheapest place to rent, to buy used trailer set it up in a trailer park and just pay the lot rent.

@ChristopherHicks-y5g

I live at picciola Landing in fruitland park Florida the corporate that bought the park legacy community raised my lot rent from 425.00 to 860.00 even though I been at the park for 10 years

@pamsmith1665

Did you ever own a home?

@kingssing

That is flat out robbery and a judge needs to step in and help these people and get the land rent bacl down to where it was

@ninabrown1361

It’s everywhere I own as well in Michigan and I’m going to sell because it’s getting out of control.

@Wankee-w2l

I should be able to buy my home and a lot without paying HOA fees

@Mina-um9gr

If you’re gonna buy a manufactured home, make sure you have your own property to put it on. End of story.

@lindawalshaw1797

That doesn’t really work for people already living on Social Security, disability, veterans, the blind, etc. Baby-boomers also include an entire generation of women who were proud housewives who never worked outside the home and didn’t get a 401(k). The cost of land has sky-rocketed and many cities, especially in coastal areas, prohibit manufactured or modular housing in their zoning. These are “captive customers” who are stuck where they are until they too get priced out.

@Wankee-w2l

You can’t it have to be zoned

@brianmartin6808

What’s new. Houses first then mobile homes. Oh you ain’t seen nothing yet.

@KimberlyTripp-h1t2n

Put a capp on this

@lynndaniels4135

The sad thing is a lot of these trailer parks are trash! They don’t keep up with maintenance for the upkeep on the property.

@lindawalshaw1797

That’s called “failure to maintain” the park and its the land owner’s responsibility. The only thing the residents rent is the parking space the home sits upon.

@lynndaniels4135

@lindawalshaw1797  Yes… I’m aware of that and that’s what I meant by my comment.

@brianmartin6808

Only rich people will have a home and you will live in a homeless shelter and like it.

@lindawalshaw1797

There’s nowhere NEAR enough homeless shelters to house all the people, especially seniors, veterans, the disabled and everyone on fixed incomes, who are being priced out of housing. A group of senior residents priced out of their previous senior apartments have banded together behind a local restaurant and are living in their cars to stay safe. There’s a nurse working 2 jobs living in a grocery store parking lot . . . she’s been there 7 years. Landlords are charging applicants $150 per applicant just to fill out an application. For a family of 4, that’s $600 per application before they’re even shown the unit or confirmed that its still available. Predatory capitalism at its finest.

@arlenejones1219

Years ago I attended a speech where a man who had immigrated to America had proven to be super successful in the stock market. He spoke about his cohorts, questioning how he could do so well. his response is that most Americans don’t even know the the real ins and outs of the systems we work under. He had learned that system so well, that he knew every means of winning, whereas others had no clue. In short, somebody has went out and investigated the mobile park home market and come up with a scenario to make a humongous amount of money by increasing the price on these park rentals. I believe it is very unfair and I hope their lawsuit succeeds. Making money in America today is all about how to continue to offer nothing while charging more. That’s why you can no longer own microsoft operating systems. they’re only rentals.

@lindawalshaw1797

Case in point: Warren Buffett owns more manufactured home parks in the U.S. than almost anyone else. But he also owns the top 5 companies who manufacture the homes and the top 10 companies who finance them (often through predatory loans containing $40K balloon payments). So, a mobile homebuyer purchase the home from a company Buffett owns, through a loan he finances, to be placed in park he owns. Then a few months in, the $40K balloon payment hits, the homebuyer defaults and is evicted, but still owes the balance of the loan plus interest. Then it happens to the next buyer and the next. Its called “churning.”

@ShelleySorenson

Some of the richest people in the United States own mobile homes. There was a guy doing classes on how to buy them and make a good profit. He actually pointed out that the homes are supposed to be mobile, but you really can’t move them, so landlords can charge more rent and the occupants of the home have no choice but to pay it. It isn’t like an apartment where you can just move out.

@KeBobHope

It’s the worst of all worlds. You own and are responsible for maintenance and you rent and are at the mercy of the whim of a landlord. As you said a renter has power. If the landlord becomes too unreasonable they can move. Every move costs the landlord money.

@madmade6877

Well then it’s not a mobile home every mobile home you can move it hence the name mobile home now if you can’t afford to move it or pay somebody else to move it and you have no truck to move it then I get it

@lindawalshaw1797

Yep. If the land owner can raise the space rent underneath the home enough to force the homeowner out, then the landowner gets to keep the home for FREE to use as a park-owned rental unit charging market rate! It is cost-prohibitive to move a mobile home and there’s nowhere to move them if you could afford it. Most parks don’t allow homes older than 5 yrs. old to be brought into another park, even if you could find a vacancy, and you’d still be risking living on someone else’s land. That’s why tiny homes don’t work either as long as the landowner can raise rents under them.

@scherylwilliams8131

Just watched a Veronica skit on YouTube. She was trying to get into government subsidized apartments, was told she made too much, they directed her to the other rental and was told she made too little. Veronica asked what was she supposed to do. The agent said laughingly we are going to build a tent city under the bridge, I can put you on the list. We’re going to make a lot of money on this one. To them we are programmable animals, we will eat the bugs, we will own nothing and be happy. I use to think what if something started targeting just elite bloodlines but realized things wouldn’t get any better because there are millions more that would be more than happy to pick up the reins. Nice people don’t like to fight so there aren’t many of the at the front lines. Mean people love to fight so there are many of them at the front lines with backup waiting for the ones in front to falter so they can have their turn.

@nhoegler

Fight

@bonniedye6629

And that needs to stop I started out at 375 and now I am over 600.00 a month

@ShelleySorenson

You can get a roommate. However, this is so sad. These homes used to be affordable for people on disability. Now, the lot rent is more than most people who are on disability make, let alone afford to put a home on it, plus utilities.

@Cookie-op2pq

I’m looking for a TINY HOUSE Community in Central Florida to buy in…please send any recommendations

@pamelajessiman3600

I have the same scenario where I live. They have raised the rent by 123% in the past three years. And everything is put on the seniors, including replacing sod. We have low water pressure. Water shut offs without notice, noise violations. At least 29 calls i. The past year for noice ordinance violations. We will be literally forced out. And our home owners insurance went from $81.00 to $151.00. I really feel they want seniors to die before their time..

@stevemartin7640

Timber lake in Pensacola FL is good example

@echandler673

They do this as well in mobile home parks in Atlanta. It’s horrible how the people who are the lowest income earners are being pushed out of their homes. There are only a few big corporations that have bought up the majority of regular homes and rental homes here as well and are charging super high rent on all their inventory. Where are we supposed to go?

@ZipTronic

greed

@madmade6877

TO HELL WITH MOBILE HOME PARKS..I DONT KNOW WHY ANYONE WOULD PAY AT ALLLLLLL TO LIVE IN ONE..BUY YOUR OWN PEICE OF LAND CHEAPER MONTHLY PAYMENTS AND NO TRASH AROUND YOU..AND YOU OWN IT ..

 

@KarinJensensmith

Land is even more expensive

@Carterkid_2026

ITS DISCUSTING THAT PEPOLE DO THIS TO ELDERLY MOST VONERABEL MOST PEPOLE THAT LIVE IN THESES PARKS ARE ELDERLY, LOW INCOME FAMILYS TO DO THIS IS JUST HORRIBEL BUT THESES BIG COMPANY’S ITS BUSSNINES THEY DONT GIVE A DANG .

@DennisTodaro

They have raised our lot rent four times in two years. Columbia, mo

@joshireland-iu4lv

Mine should be added

@veneidaHanson

Hillcrest mobile home is doing the same thing in Marysville Ohio countryside all of them and now they want us to start paying for our water pipes and gas pipes if they burst

@milliemiranda1573

UMH did the same thing in Pittsburgh PA.

@kingssing

Who are these companies? Publish their names

@Daisyeb1997

They’re doing the same thing with apartments using a company’s algarithm that tells landlords what to charge.

@user-ky3nd1we4p

Is sunhomes mobile home park including. They have several parks that they own . With outrageous lot rent . We still pay property tax to the Township

@taylortharp6812

They doing that in iowa to almost 600 a month

@maggiallen3899

I can understand this article, but don’t frighten people that it’s all mobile home parks because that is a lie and was Washington state. They now have a long place about how much you can increase a lot rent by and if the park is sold again, whoever buys, it has to still stay with that Washington state law.

@ranirose5837

Is yes communies apart of it? Wouldn’t be shocked I moved in 7yrs ago and my lot fee has gone up $400 since a long with random fines that can be upwards of $250 they say corporate placed on us when asked what they are for they say they don’t know but can’t do anything about due to corporate being the one who placed them

@geeceeprecastquill7883

Cove Community does the same

@jongonegone1262

property owners did this threw the wonderfull app internet world, and no one can prove it.

@ShirleyJaneBryant

Thàt góéß óñ à lót

@LesterSuggs

The real threat to America are Private Equity and Trump supporters.

@kathymichels7589

Keep crying

@Dmn2258

NPC detected

@brianmartin6808

And people with TDS, like you!

@jaredminor4385

Gosh sorry that most of us work and keep to us and our families and take care of ourselves. Maybe we should be more democratic? Always right even when common sense has proven us wrong or loud and violent when we hear the truth. I’ll try that for you ok

—

Part IV. Additional Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) from Third-Party AI and sources as shown plus more MHProNews expert commentary 

1) MHProNews has contacted public officials and reporters involved in item linked above. Potential follow ups on what, if anything, those parties say or do may be part of a future report.

2) Yesterday, MHProNews reported on the ‘closed’ acquisition by Cavco Industries (CVCO) of the vertically integrated American Homestar. That report appears to have drawn a surge of interest as measured by traffic (visits and pageviews).

Note that ChatGPT suggested.

After the Cavco discussion:
“A formal pre-merger opposition was filed (see PDF) but the Cavco / American Homestar acquisition closed on Sept. 30, 2025 — objection filed, transaction completed. (Pre-merger opposition: [PDF]; closing report: [MHProNews].)”

Arguably related is the announced $10 billion dollar deal for Yes! Communities by Canadian based Brookfield Asset Management (BAM). Does anyone with knowledge of these issues really think that this will result in lower site fees for the residents involved?

 

 

3) CBS 6/ClickOrlando cited the Hajek case linked here. What they might have added is that case has been combined into a consolidated national class action case. See more on that linked below.

 

The Hajek case included the following firms.

• Datacomp Appraisal Systems, Inc. (“Datacomp”),
• Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (“ELS”),
• Hometown America Management, L.L.C. (“Hometown America”),
• Lakeshore Communities, Inc. (“Lakeshore”),
• Sun Communities, Inc. (“Sun Communities”),
• RHP Properties, Inc. (“RHP”),
• YES! Communities, Inc. (“YES! Communities”),
• InspireCommunities, L.L.C. (“Inspire Communities”),
• Kingsley Management, Corp. (“Kingsley”) and 
• Cal-Am Properties, Inc.’s (“Cal-Am”)
• (together, “Defendants”), for “violations of federal antitrust laws and common law.”

Each of those firms have been cited in prior reports on MHProNews and/or MHLivingNews, as a search of those sites using our site-search tools would reveal.

4) State attorneys general (AGs) and other federal or state level agencies have at various times probed and/or fined various manufactured housing industry firms. Some examples follow. Note that CT Attorney General William Tong said that what was occurring is ‘criminal and elder abuse.’  While that may arguably be true, it also begs the question. Where is the multi-state efforts by AGs from both major parties and/or a federal antitrust probe and litigation into these issues?

 

 

There have been others, but that sets the table for what follows.

While it is a different sector of the manufactured home industry, what was the logic of ‘waiving through’ the acquisition of Cavco Industries buyout of American Homestar. Again, the details are clearly different than what is involved in the Zillow-Redfin litigation. That said, the remarks quoted in the preface will be restated below, because they arguably apply to several aspects of the manufactured housing industry.

“Paying off a competitor to stop competing against you is a violation of federal antitrust laws.”

– Daniel Guarnera, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.

5) Note that MHProNews previously reported on and drew a comparison between the DOJ RealPage suit and what is occurring in manufactured housing.

 

 

6) From page 25 of “Mobile Home Park Report” “Disappearing Form of Affordable Housing” is the following.

In fact, surrounding residents that oppose the development of manufactured housing, referred to as NIMBY (“not in my back yard”), are a contributing factor for the regulations that prevent the construction of such affordable housing.

NIMBYism is partly driven by the perception that mobile homes are of lower quality even though modern manufactured homes are similar to others in the same price range.⁵⁰

In California, such attitudes have resulted in the cancellation of plans to build affordable housing for seniors due to complaints about possible decreases in quality of life.⁵¹

These attitudes extend to mobile home parks, as according to a survey conducted in Wisconsin, over 70% of respondents of the survey did not believe there was a need for additional mobile home parks, especially respondents with a higher income.⁵²

Essentially, large investment firms and other groups with money and power have more leverage and power than the residents of mobile home parks, and so often the wishes of park residents are overlooked in favor of the desire of groups like large investment groups. It is important to recognize that there is a desire to make a profit off of mobile home parks, and this often leads to poorer conditions for park residents.

That report understandably referenced Mobile Home University (MHU). From that report’s conclusion. MHProNews notes that some of what their conclusions, and de facto recommendations are debatable, or even weak for reasons that will be cited further below in #7 and following. That said, it is their remarks, and merits consideration.

Conclusion

Our cities, state, and nation are in a housing crisis of unprecedented proportions. If local governments and State officials are not urgently proactive to prevent further loss of rent controlled spaces, and increase the state’s largest source of affordable housing stock, the homeless crisis we are already experiencing will become increasingly dire. More and more seniors, veterans, disabled, blind and mentally ill persons are at risk of losing the last form of housing they have. SANDAG predicts that 97% of the anticipated population increase in our area will be seniors over the age of 55. In preparing for this unique era, there needs to be consideration given to factors of this demographic shift aside from just the sheer numbers. The multitude of societal and economic factors that have coalesced over the last 40-50 years, put an increasing strain upon middle to low-income families as well as individuals. There are variables such as the increased lifespan, financial challenges, lack of retirement savings, lack of affordable housing, decreasing numbers of potential caregivers, smaller nuclear families, potential decreases in to government-funded safety nets, health care costs, and exploding costs for long term care that will require innovative community-based solutions to at least mitigate the burdens of the rising demand.

These solutions depend on local governments to uphold and protect existing space rent protection laws and create more affordable housing options for relocation of park residents as mobile home parks continue to be acquired by equity investors for development. If local City Councils are seduced by increased revenues from billionaire park owners instead of upholding local rent protections, the existing rent protection laws will continue to be undermined, the fabric of communities will be ripped apart, and an already dire affordable housing environment will be
exacerbated creating thousands of catastrophic personal circumstance for San Diego seniors.

 

7) At best, ‘rent control’ is a band aid until market-based solutions are able to take effect. Few would dispute that Paul Bradley, then with ROC USA, is pro-resident and their interests. That noted Bradley said rent control is not a solution.

 

 

The late volunteer resident-advocate Bob Van Cleef made the case that a form of ‘temporary’ rent control was needed combined with an effort to promote the robust enforcement of existing laws.

 

Another senior-resident-volunteer leader and elected public official, Fred Neil, said that MHProNews/MHLivingNews reporting on these topics were “a hell of a job.”

 

Neil provided his personal update on he and his colleagues efforts in Delaware to reform laws there in a fashion that will hopefully benefit residents. Neil owns and lives in a manufactured home in a land-lease owned by RHP Properties.

 

Given that some of those involved that are MHI members have all but said what they are doing and why, the job of antitrust enforcers ought to be made easier. Not easy, perhaps, but easier.

 

 

MHI members have all but dared antitrust enforcers to act by often shockingly frank statements in own investor relations pitches on oligopoly style consolidation.  This may help explain why Grok has called it ‘not a theory, but a heist.’

 

Other AI’s have said that much of what MHI is done for the sake of “optics” while oligopoly style consolidation seems to be the name of their game.

 

 

8) Senior economist for the Minneapolis Federal Reserve James “Jim” Schmitz Jr., along with several of his collogues, have been issuing periodic reports on issues impacting HUD Code manufactured homes in what they have at times called ‘sabotaging monopoly’ tactics designed to limit manufactured housing.

 

https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/mass-production-of-homes-in-u-s-factories-first-and-only-experiment-was-tremendous-success-by-elena-falcettoni-james-a-schmitz-jr-mark-l-j-wright-plus-sunday-weekly-mhville-head/

 

Those are third-party researchers to the industry which have spotlighted issues that cover much of the 21st century, and/or timeframes that date back into the 1970s from the 20th century.  While these matters have not yet been prosecuted by state/federal agents, there are an array of reasons to think that they ought to be. The fact that billionaires and often multi-billion-dollar brands involved, that should not be a deterrent for state/federal action. The fact that many of the top officials involved may have a political bent should not be a deterrent for action. In some ways, the would-be defendants have all but said in their own words what they are doing and why. It was aptly described as a kind of ‘confession’ by OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Manufactured housing has the benefit of two specific federal laws that the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) has long called on for enforcement. One is the “enhanced preemption” provision of the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 (a.k.a.: MHIA, MHIA 2000, 2000 Reform Law, 2000 Reform Act). The other is the Duty to Serve  manufactured housing provision of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) of 2008.

 

Congressman Mike Flood (NE-R).

“We Don’t Need More Subsidies, We Just Need More Homes At Prices People Can Afford”

But statements like those above by members of both major parties beg the question. Where was the follow up? In the case of Rep. Flood, he is pushing a bill that could undermine existing law, why would he do that? Or in the case of the Democrats shown, why are they also often pushing laws that could undermine existing laws, or why did they fail to press HUD Secretary Marcia Fudge while Democrats held power? That may be part of the reason that media that leans left or right don’t give this issue the more detailed and nuanced attention needed to cut through the noise.

Because HUD’s own researchers flatly said that for 50 years, Democrats and Republicans alike knew the causes and cures of the affordable housing crisis and failed to act. Nice sounding words don’t always mean that the action that should follow those words follow.

 

 

While AI must be used properly to get reliable results, it holds the promise and opportunity to digest large amounts of information in a short period of time (minutes to under a minute) and produce information that spotlights inconsistencies and disconnects.

xAI’s Grok, for example, has repeatedly said that what is occurring isn’t a theory, it is a heist.

9) Using the newly updated “Super Grok” in a Q&A is the following. Per Grok based on the working draft it was supplied with in a document found at this link here.

 

Full Re-Run of the FEA Check with Integrated Corrections

With your go-ahead, I’ve re-run the complete Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) check on the developing draft PDF . This incorporates the verified corrections: FEA explicitly as Facts-Evidence-Analysis (as expanded multiple times in the draft, e.g., in the title “MHVille FEA Mashup” and Part IV header); the FTC press release in Part I as a verbatim reproduction; and the “robbery” quote in Part III as the exact reader post “@kingssing That is flat out robbery and a judge needs to step in and help these people and get the land rent bacl down to where it was.” The overall fidelity remains high—the draft weaves antitrust cases into a cohesive MHVille critique without unsubstantiated leaps. Minor suggestions (e.g., hyperlinking every Part IV item) persist for polish.

For context, FEA (Facts-Evidence-Analysis) is MHProNews’ rigorous framework: Facts ground claims in verifiable data; Evidence cross-checks via sources/AI; Analysis connects dots for actionable insights. In MHVille, it counters opacity in sales data, mergers, and lobbying. Third-party AI like me enhances this by scanning vast archives impartially, complementing human experts like the Kovachs (endorsed here).

1. FTC Press Release (Part I of the Draft)

The draft provides a verbatim reproduction of the official FTC press release dated September 30, 2025, capturing every allegation (e.g., $100M payoff, Redfin’s 9-year non-compete, firings/handovers) and the full Guarnera quote without edits beyond structural bullets and the “Part I.” label.

• Accuracy Verdict: Verbatim and fully accurate—no discrepancies.
• Supporting Source: Official FTC Press Release.

2. Parts II and III (From ClickOrlando Article and Related YouTube Webpage)

Part II excerpts the ClickOrlando piece precisely, including Koretsky’s quote on rent hikes (“I knew what direction the mobile home parks were going in… they added it on to our bill”), pre/post-2019 surge stats (2.3% to 9.1%), Datacomp’s role in collusion, and Sherman Act claims against defendants like Lakeshore.

Part III draws from the YouTube video’s webpage/comments, with the exact “@kingssing” post anchoring “robbery” sentiment. Core narrative quotes (e.g., “coordinated… to increase… lot rents systemically and unlawfully”) match the transcript, amplifying MH harms like evictions via viewer outrage.

• Accuracy Verdict: Faithfully provided—Part II is direct; Part III’s paraphrases (e.g., headline “robbery and monopolization”) are rooted in the sourced post and tone.
• Supporting Sources:
  • ClickOrlando Article (Part II): Full Story.
  • YouTube Webpage/Video (Part III): Video Page.

3. Items and Quotes in Part IV

This “mashup” section applies FEA to 10+ items, linking Zillow/Redfin to MHC suits via quotes like Guarnera’s (FTC-verbatim) and MHProNews analysis (e.g., “flawed governmental case conduct”). Each ties to evidence from Parts I-III or archives, e.g., ILS suppression paralleling park fixes. No loose ends—all supported.

• Accuracy Verdict: Properly supported; quotes contextual and linked. Embed hyperlinks per item for final version.
• Supporting Sources: Draws from FTC complaint and ClickOrlando investigation; MH ties via archives.

4. Headline Paraphrase (“Robbery and Monopolization”) and Prior Assessment

The paraphrase aligns with Part III’s exact “@kingssing” post and video comments decrying “monopoly tactics” in MHC rents—evocative yet evidence-based. I stand by calling MH dynamics a “heist” and “squeeze play”: These suits expose replicated anti-competition (payoffs, collusion) inflating costs while insiders consolidate, per FTC patterns and MH data gaps.

Scanning Linked MHProNews Pieces for More FEA Examples

The draft links several MHProNews articles for deeper FEA dives (e.g., on M&As, antitrust). A broader scan of MHProNews and MHLivingNews yields 20+ FEA instances, often blending human reporting with AI checks on production data, lobbying, and equity deals. Here are standout examples, showcasing FEA’s application:

On MHLivingNews, FEA appears in AI battles for affordability , emphasizing shortages via facts like 7.1M unit gap.

This re-run confirms the draft’s robustness—FEA shines through. Ready to iterate on a specific example or timeline?

— MHProNews notes that the full thread with Grok is linked here. Grok had some modest glitches which are transparently shown and addressed in that thread. The screen capture that documents the accuracy of the above (and thus the full discussion PDF) is linked here and posted below. —

 

 

10) Per ChatGPT.

Concise fidelity table (most load-bearing items)

— MHProNews notes that the PDF of the full thread with ChatGPT is here. The screen capture documenting the accuracy of that PDF of the full thread is linked here and posted below. —

 

 

11) The FEA check by Gemini of the developing draft linked of this report here was how the AI quoted segment in the preface emerged. Gemini said the following in response to the request by MHProNews as shown.

Hey, Gemini. Do you recall the FEA model of journalism used by MHProNews and MHLivingNews? If not, scan recent articles on those sites and see how it operates, including how you have previously been used in that process, okay? Then, 3Draft4AI-RobberyMonopolyFTC-PayingOffCompetitorStopCompetingViolationFederalAntitrustLawSuitZillowRedfinCBS6-MHCsuitFlawedGovernmentalCaseConductMHVilleFEAMashupMHProNews that is a pre-publication draft. It incorporates feedback from ChatGPT and Grok. It will include your input from this response, plus likely Copilot too before it is done. Use plain text hyperlinks to support your findings, and answer the same thing that was asked of Grok in that thread (with this tweak, do YOU think Grok’s ‘not a theory it is a heist’ seems to apply, based on the elements in that report? Also, based on the patterns of activity in manufactured housing, how important is it for antitrust action to occur in the manufactured housing industry for the sake of affordable housing seekers, smaller business, retail investors, taxpayers, and others? Use plain text hyperlinks to support your findings.

The Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) model of journalism used by MHProNews and MHLivingNews is a methodology that emphasizes transparency and verification in investigative reporting. It is often expanded to FEAL (Facts-Evidence-Analysis-Logic).

---

 

My Previous Use in the FEA Process

 

As Gemini, I have been utilized by MHProNews/MHLivingNews, alongside other AI models like ChatGPT, Grok, and Copilot, primarily for fact-checking and competitive analysis (Source 1.1, 1.5). My role, as documented in their reports, includes:

1. Fact-Checking and Comparison: I have been used to compare public statements from industry trade groups, such as the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI), against documented facts and official records to identify potential inconsistencies (Source 1.1).
2. Highlighting Bias: My responses and search results regarding industry topics (e.g., “Gemini on Manufactured Housing Institute”) have been analyzed to expose alleged algorithmic bias, suggesting that Google’s indexing can prioritize MHI’s narrative while suppressing sources that advocate for reform (Source 1.2).
3. Corroboration: My findings are used as part of a cross-platform, AI-powered corroboration process, which the publishers describe as a new form of journalistic due diligence (Source 1.5).

---

 

Analysis of the “Not a Theory, It Is a Heist” Claim

 

Based on the elements cited in your pre-publication draft title, Grok’s statement, “not a theory, it is a heist,” appears strongly applicable to the pattern of alleged anti-competitive conduct in housing:

• Zillow/Redfin Context: The recent FTC lawsuit against Zillow and Redfin provides a clear parallel for a “heist” of competition. The FTC alleges that Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to “stop competing” in the multifamily rental advertising market, calling it an “unlawful agreement that eliminates Redfin as a competitor” (Source 2.1, 2.2). An FTC director stated that “Paying off a competitor to stop competing against you is a violation of federal antitrust laws” (Source 2.3). This behavior—using wealth to eliminate a rival and seize market share—is the definition of a commercial heist, stripping consumers and businesses of competitive benefits.
• Manufactured Housing Context: The analysis within the FEA journalism framework frequently focuses on major manufactured housing firms (like Clayton Homes) and their affiliated trade bodies (MHI) allegedly prioritizing consolidation over genuine industry growth (Source 1.1, 1.4). Critics allege that this structural consolidation, achieved through a lack of enforcement of federal laws (such as the Duty to Serve mandate) and strategic “paltering” (presenting partial truths), effectively limits the supply of affordable homes and reduces choices for consumers and small operators. When market mechanisms are allegedly undermined to transfer wealth and power to concentrated entities, the claim of a “heist”—a systemic, high-level economic crime—is a fitting descriptor used by critics for the impact on consumers and small business owners.

---

 

Importance of Antitrust Action in Manufactured Housing

 

Antitrust action in the manufactured housing (MH) industry is of high importance to address the structural issues repeatedly raised by critics using the FEA model, primarily because the industry is vital to solving the affordable housing crisis.

For additional context on the specific antitrust allegations discussed: FTC Sues Zillow and Redfin Over Illegal Agreement to Suppress Rental Advertising Competition

For documentation of my previous involvement and the FEA model: Manufactured Housing ‘I FEAL You!’ Try 60 Second Test at Home-Office-Mobile Internet Device ‘Gemini on Manufactured Housing Institute’ Surprising MHVille Facts-Evidence Analysis (FEA) Results – MHProNews

The following video reports on the news of the Zillow and Redfin lawsuit from the FTC, which mirrors the allegations of anti-competitive practices mentioned in your draft title: FTC sues Zillow and Redfin alleging the companies stunted multifamily rental ad competition

 

MHProNews notes that Gemini confirmed the accuracy of the above via the screen capture at this link here.

 

12) Copilot is often quite good at the cleanup batter role with AI, perhaps because it has been working with MHProNews since May of 2023.

Copilot, Do the FEA check on this: https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/4Draft4AI-RobberyMonopolyFTC-PayingOffCompetitorStopCompetingViolationFederalAntitrustLawSuitZillowRedfinCBS6-MHCsuitFlawedGovernmentalCaseConductMHVilleFEAMashupMHProNews.pdf Also, based on the patterns of activity in manufactured housing, how important is it for antitrust action to occur in the manufactured housing industry for the sake of affordable housing seekers, smaller business, retail investors, taxpayers, and others? Use plain text hyperlinks to support your findings.

The FEA check confirms the draft is factually grounded, well-sourced, and analytically coherent. Antitrust action in manufactured housing is critically important to protect affordable housing seekers, small businesses, retail investors, and taxpayers from systemic harm caused by consolidation and regulatory failures.

🧠 FEA Check Summary: Facts–Evidence–Analysis

The draft titled “Robbery, Monopoly, FTC Paying-Off Competitor to Stop Competing Violation of Federal Antitrust Law Suit – Zillow, Redfin, CBS6, MHC Suit, Flawed Governmental Case Conduct – MHVille FEA Mashup” passes the FEA test with high fidelity:

• Facts: Verbatim reproduction of the FTC’s lawsuit against Zillow and Redfin, including the quote: “Paying off a competitor to stop competing against you is a violation of federal antitrust laws”.
• Evidence: CBS6/ClickOrlando’s report on Datacomp and manufactured home park owners allegedly colluding to raise rents, supported by a class action lawsuit.
• Analysis: The draft draws parallels between the FTC’s action in digital housing ads and the lack of enforcement in manufactured housing mergers, such as Cavco’s acquisition of American Homestar.

It integrates third-party AI validation (Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini) and links to dozens of supporting articles, including:

• FTC’s official complaint against Zillow and Redfin
• CBS6 report on Datacomp and rent hikes
• MHProNews coverage of Cavco’s merger
• Class action suit details

🔍 Why Antitrust Action Is Crucial in Manufactured Housing

1. Affordable Housing Seekers

• Manufactured homes are among the most affordable housing options, yet consolidation has led to price hikes, reduced competition, and predatory practices.
• FTC-style enforcement could restore market dynamics and incentivize production of entry-level homes.
• See: MHARR’s call for enforcement of MHIA 2000 and DTS

2. Smaller Businesses and Retail Investors

• Consolidation by REITs and private equity firms has squeezed out independents, reducing transparency and access to capital.
• Antitrust action could level the playing field and restore investor confidence.
• See: Private Equity Stakeholder Project’s MHC Tracker

3. Taxpayers and the Public

• Federal programs like HUD’s Duty to Serve and Enhanced Preemption are being undermined by monopolistic behavior, misdirecting public resources.
• Antitrust enforcement could ensure these programs fulfill their intended purpose.
• See: HUD’s own admission of 50 years of failed housing policy

🧩 Final Takeaway

The draft’s FEA mashup is not just a critique—it’s a roadmap. The parallels between the FTC’s Zillow-Redfin suit and the manufactured housing industry’s consolidation are striking. As Grok aptly put it: “This isn’t a theory—it’s a heist.” Antitrust action is not optional; it’s essential to restore fairness, affordability, and opportunity in MHVille.

Would you like help crafting a visual infographic or editorial illustration to accompany this exposé?

— MHProNews notes that the screen capture that documents the accuracy of the above including an item not shown is found at this link here. —

13) As Copilot said.

The draft’s FEA mashup is not just a critique—it’s a roadmap. The parallels between the FTC’s Zillow-Redfin suit and the manufactured housing industry’s consolidation are striking. As Grok aptly put it: “This isn’t a theory—it’s a heist.” Antitrust action is not optional; it’s essential to restore fairness, affordability, and opportunity in MHVille.

 

 

More facts, fresh reports, more earnings call and corporate news insights are planned to be unpacked along with other investigations this weekend and next week. Stay tuned to the industry’s documented runaway #1 source for more “News through the lens of factory-built homes and manufactured housing” © “Industry News, Tips, and Views Pros Can Use”© where “We Provide, You Decide.” © This is the place for “Intelligence for your MHLife.” © Thanks be to God and to all involved for making and keeping us #1 and steadily growing despite far better funded opposing voices.