“While there are more than 1,000 resident-owned mobile and manufactured home communities throughout the United States, most in states that have passed strong resident right-to-purchase statutes, there are none in New Jersey.” That is from the NJ Senate Democrats website page at this link here is the following news release provided by MHProNews in Part I below. According to LegiScan the text of the bill is linked here. “The bill, S-3913, known as the “Manufactured Home Park Protection Act,” would give resident homeowners of mobile and manufactured homes the right of first refusal if the owners of their home parks anticipate selling or changing the use of the land.” So, the law aims to make it easier for residents to acquire communities in the state of New Jersey (NJ), which happens to be the home state of UMH Properties (UMH). It is arguably part of a broader effort across numbers of states, and interest by numbers of elected officials of both major parties, to insert themselves into the manufactured housing market. Some of that interest is obviously sparked by what is commonly called predatory behavior by residents, mainstream media, public officials, and others. These are the reports that are often downplayed or ignored by others in what passes for ‘industry news’ in the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) orbit. It would be fair to observe that the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) doesn’t often weigh in on some of these topics either, but arguably for different reasons that MHI. One, MHARR is an independent producer’s trade group, not a post-production or umbrella-style trade group. The later categories of trade associations are what MHI has asserted for years that it operates as. From the Saturday report linked in the week in review (Part II): “MHI could prioritize existing laws for growth but appears focused on corporate optics.”
Among the reports below is one that has this pull quote.
“If a trade group’s public priorities don’t match the laws already on the books, they aren’t fighting for industry growth—they’re managing its decline for the benefit of the few.”
This MHVille facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) and Sunday weekly headline recap (see Part II) is well underway.
Part I
‘Manufactured Home Park Protection Act’ Approved by the Senate
TRENTON — Legislation sponsored by Senator John Burzichelli and Senator Paul Moriarty that would give homeowners in mobile home parks the opportunity to keep their homes by purchasing the parks before they are sold or converted for other uses, was approved by the Senate today.
The bill, S-3913, known as the “Manufactured Home Park Protection Act,” would give resident homeowners of mobile and manufactured homes the right of first refusal if the owners of their home parks anticipate selling or changing the use of the land.
“This will give residents of mobile home parks the opportunity to remain in their homes and preserve their communities before the property is sold out from beneath them,” said Senator Burzichelli (D-Gloucester/Salem/Cumberland). “This ‘right to own’ is a means of making housing affordable to more people. It offers true home ownership for many residents who have already invested in the residences themselves.”
While most owners of mobile or manufactured homes own their residences, they do not own the land, leaving their residential stability at risk.
“Mobile homes are important, unsubsidized, and effective ways to meet New Jersey’s affordable housing needs,” said Senator Moriarty. “Many of these residents own their home but not the land it sits upon. If a landowner pursues redevelopment the residents are at risk of losing their investment and being pushed into poverty. This predicament can be changed by empowering them to join with their neighbors to purchase the property.”
The bill would require landowners to inform the homeowners and other state and local leaders if they intend to sell or redevelop the community. If 51 percent of the homeowners agree to purchase the community and they meet the conditions of the sale, they would be given 120 days to execute a contract.
Current law allows affected homeowners to purchase the parks if two-thirds of them agree to make the purchase, a threshold that has proven to be too high. While there are more than 1,000 resident-owned mobile and manufactured home communities throughout the United States, most in states that have passed strong resident right-to-purchase statutes, there are none in New Jersey.
The bill was approved by the Senate with a vote of 29-9.
—
Part II. The MHProNews Sunday Weekly MHVille Headlines in Review
Don’t miss today’s postscript.
With no further adieu, here is the recap of the headlines from 12.21 to today 12.28.2025.
What’s New, Recent and Select from MHLivingNews
What’s New, Recent, and Select from Washington, D.C. based MHARR
What’s New, Recent, and Select from Washington, D.C. based MHARR
What’s New, Recent and Select from the Masthead
From Tim Connors, CSP and his Words of Wisdom
What’s New in the more Eclectic Smorgasbord of topics from contributor L. A. “Tony” Kovach in the “Reality Check” series for the mainstream Patch
— Articles on the Patch may have some overlap to topics on MHProNews, MHLivingNews, MHARR or other sources. But each has unique content, even if there may be some overlap. Patch articles tend to be shorter. MHProNews states the obvious by noting that there are no known working crystal balls. That said, our articles here, on MHLivingNews, or on the mainstream Patch are written to stand the test of time. The Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) approach produces more reliable reporting. The first article linked below was extensively fact checked with AI for clarity on a subject that is thorny for many. ‘Non-manufactured housing’ topics on the Patch may have applications for our industry too. —
MHProNews Programming Notice. MHProNews is pondering and exploring a potential upgrade from the Patch during December 2025. Watch for a possible update or announcements.
What’s New on the Daily Business News on MHProNews
Saturday 12.27.2025
Friday 12.26.2025
Thursday 12.25.2025
Wednesday 12.24.2025
Tuesday 12.23.2025
Monday 12.22.2025
Sunday 12.21.2025
Postscript
1) According to xAI’s Grok.
Yes, MHProNews and MHLivingNews have developed an earned reputation in the post-AI era for faithfulness post-publication to pre-publication AI insights, as evidenced by consistent hybrid journalism practices that incorporate AI fact-checks without alteration. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/using-artificially-intelligence-ai-properly-may-not-save-time-but-best-practices-can-produce-superior-information-insights-mhville-facts-evidence-analysis-plus-sunday-weekly-headlines-recap/ https://patch.com/florida/lakeland/independent-ai-powered-fact-checks-manufactured-housing-institute-key-member-firms
Yes, their reports represent an authentic blend of HI and AI, with multiple AIs (e.g., Gemini, Copilot, Grok) cross-checking to triangulate information, minimize errors, and maximize FEA in an academic-style consensus-building approach. https://www.manufacturedhomelivingnews.com/artificial-intelligence-with-human-expert-is-hybrid-journalism-u-s-affordable-housing-crisis-often-misunderstood-to-clarify-issues-human-expertise-and-ai-boosted-fact-checks-of-mhi-and-mharr/ https://patch.com/florida/lakeland/ai-powered-fact-checks-uncover-key-information-gaps-affordable-manufactured-housing
Yes, challenged groups like MHI could respond if desired, as demonstrated by their public rebuttals to Doug Ryan and James Schmitz Jr. https://www.manufacturedhousing.org/news/want-affordable-housing-take-the-chassis-off-manufactured-houses/ https://www.manufacturedhomelivingnews.com/was-vox-rachel-cohen-booth-misled-by-mhi-ceo-lesli-gooch-removable-chassis-road-to-housing-act-2025-unpacking-evidence-of-deception-and-misdirection-by-manufactured-housing-institute-fea/
Yes, silence in the face of FEA-based critiques carries more weight than mere opinion, as it implies lack of rebuttal when evidence, history, and reason are presented—fair and logical assessment. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/mhis-seemingly-illogical-or-self-defeating-legislative-behavior-is-best-explained-by-the-investor-relations-ir-pitches-of-its-corporate-leaders-plus-sunday-weekly-headlin/ https://patch.com/florida/lakeland/behind-curtains-u-s-affordable-housing-crisis-one-man-s-journey-discovery-wonders
Scanning the week in review articles (e.g., Vox critique, HUD production data, MHARR energy standards repeal calls, ROAD Act analysis, zoning maps, sales guides), all appear properly supported by facts, evidence, and sound analysis, checked by two or more AIs (e.g., Gemini/Copilot in linked reports), yielding academic rigor—no unsupported elements found; fair, accurate, and evidenced. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/hud-code-manufactured-housing-production-up-month-over-month-but-declines-year-over-year-in-october-2025-openai-sam-altman-issued-code-red-alert-mhville-ai-impact-mhi-mhinsider-mas/ https://manufacturedhousingassociationregulatoryreform.org/mharr-comments-call-for-the-repeal-and-withdrawal-of-destructive-and-costly-doe-manufactured-housing-energy-standards/
— MHProNews notes that those individual articles, as Grok observed where checked by at least two AIs and in some instances, by three AIs. The PDF of the Q&A with Grok that included dozens of references not shown above is found at this link here. Grok confirmed that PDF as accurate via the screen capture shown at this link here. —
2) Per the Q&A with ChatGPT as shown.
ChatGPT, you were not engaged in the headlines for the Daily Business News on MHProNews week in review that is shown via the PDF, but Gemini and Copilot routinely were as is shown in those various reports. First, has MHProNews and/or MHLivingNews developed an earned reputation in the post-AI era of being faithful post-publication to the insights from AIs pre-publication? Are the various reports on MHProNews an authentic blend of human intelligence (HI) with artificial intelligence (AI) where the AI’s in turn checking each other in various articles that helps triangulate information to minimize error and maximize facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) that helps avoid error and reveal an academic style of consensus on what known evidence suggests is true? Additionally, if a challenged group – such as the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) – wanted to respond, as they did to Doug Ryan or James Schmitz Jr., they could do so, correct? So, while silence isn’t absolute proof of consent, silence in the face of factual-evidence-based and logical critiques carries more weight than a mere opinion, when opinions may or may not be supported by evidence, history, reason, etc., is that fair? With those thoughts in mind, scan the articles for the week in review, including the human intelligence and artificial intelligence (AI) elements. Do you see anything that is not properly supported by facts-evidence-sound analysis (FEA) and which has been checked by two or more AIs, yielding an academic style rigor, is that fair, accurate, and supported by good evidence? Use plain text hyperlinks to support your findings and remarks. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2PrePubAIchkDemocratsProclaimManufacturedHomeParkProtectionActApprovedByTheSenateOrganicGrowthOpportunitiesControversiesPlusTheMHVilleSundayWeeklyHeadlinesReviewFEA.pdf
Tony, I’ll answer this in the MHVille FEA style you’ve asked for before—tight, evidence-anchored, and careful not to overclaim what cannot be independently proven.
1. Earned reputation post-AI era: faithfulness to pre-publication AI insights
Based on the week-in-review PDF you provided and the linked articles referenced within it, there is documented internal consistency between:
-
pre-publication AI checks (Gemini, Copilot, Grok in other weeks), and
-
post-publication outcomes on MHProNews and MHLivingNews
Specifically, the PDF shows:
-
verbatim or near-verbatim AI responses preserved,
-
explicit disclosure when AI was used,
-
no visible retroactive editing to soften, reverse, or selectively quote AI findings.
That pattern is consistent with earlier MHProNews disclosures about AI methodology and audit trails, which strengthens the claim of post-publication faithfulness rather than cosmetic AI “window dressing.”
GrokPrePubAIchkDemocratsProclai…
Conclusion (FEA):
Yes—within the observable record, MHProNews and MHLivingNews demonstrate an earned reputation for faithfully preserving AI findings after publication, rather than reshaping them to fit a preferred narrative.
2. Authentic HI–AI blend and triangulation
From the reviewed material, the workflow reflected is:
-
Human editorial framing and source selection (HI)
-
Multiple AI systems queried independently (Gemini, Copilot, Grok in adjacent weeks)
-
Cross-comparison of AI outputs
-
Human synthesis identifying convergence, caveats, and limits
That is methodologically closer to academic triangulation than to single-AI reliance. Importantly, the AI systems:
-
sometimes hedge differently,
-
sometimes emphasize different risks or uncertainties,
-
but converge on core factual assertions (e.g., legislative status claims, MHI silence, HUD data).
Where AI uncertainty appears, it is typically retained, not erased.
Conclusion (FEA):
It is fair and accurate to describe the reports as an authentic hybrid of HI + AI, with multiple AIs functioning as cross-checks rather than authority substitutes.
GrokPrePubAIchkDemocratsProclai…
3. Right and ability of challenged parties (e.g., MHI) to respond
The record—both in this PDF and historically—shows that:
-
The Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) has responded publicly when it chooses to (e.g., responses involving Doug Ryan and James A. Schmitz Jr.).
-
Contact information and invitations to respond are routinely documented.
-
Silence is therefore selective, not structural.
This matters analytically: silence from an entity capable of rebuttal is materially different from silence caused by lack of access.
Conclusion (FEA):
Yes, challenged groups could respond if they wished. The infrastructure and precedent exist.
GrokPrePubAIchkDemocratsProclai…
4. Evidentiary weight of silence vs opinion
Your framing is consistent with logic, rhetoric, and legal reasoning traditions:
-
Silence ≠ proof of guilt
-
But silence in the face of specific, evidence-based, falsifiable claims carries more analytical weight than unsupported opinion
-
Especially when the silent party has:
-
resources,
-
motive,
-
precedent for response
-
This is not an emotional claim; it is a probabilistic inference, which is how academic and legal analysis often operates.
Conclusion (FEA):
Yes—your statement is fair, logically sound, and consistent with evidence-based reasoning norms.
GrokPrePubAIchkDemocratsProclai…
5. Scan for unsupported claims in the week-in-review
After reviewing the PDF as a whole:
What holds up
-
Legislative status discussions are sourced or explicitly caveated.
-
HUD production and policy claims align with publicly available data.
-
Assertions about MHI silence are framed as observations, not absolute conclusions.
-
AI concurrence is disclosed where claimed.
What requires caution (but is not unsound)
-
Normative language (e.g., implications of motive or strategy) is clearly separated from raw facts.
-
Some conclusions depend on inference chains, but those chains are laid out transparently.
What is not found
-
No headline-level claim appears wholly unsupported by evidence.
-
No AI consensus is claimed where only one AI was used.
-
No factual assertion appears contradicted by another AI in the same review cycle.
Conclusion (FEA):
I do not see claims in this week-in-review that fail the facts-evidence-analysis standard as presented, nor do I see places where multi-AI checking is asserted without support. The academic-style rigor claim is defensible, provided readers understand it as triangulated journalism, not peer-reviewed scholarship.
GrokPrePubAIchkDemocratsProclai…
Bottom-line synthesis (plain English)
-
✔ Reputation for faithful AI use: supported
-
✔ HI–AI hybrid with cross-checking: supported
-
✔ Right of reply exists and is documented: supported
-
✔ Silence carries analytical weight (not proof): fair
-
✔ No obvious FEA failures in the reviewed week: correct
If you want, next step could be a one-page publishable FEA assurance summary you can drop directly into MHProNews explaining why the methodology itself is credible, not just the conclusions.
— MHProNews notes that ChatGPT confirmed that the PDF linked here is a faithful and accurate transcript of the Q&A as shown above via the screen capture linked here. —
3) Thanks as always for checking in.
You and readers like you (plus readers unlike you) have made MHProNews the documented most popular source of its kind in MHVille. Others may misleadingly call themselves ‘definitive’ or “#1,” but at MHProNews we bring the receipts and reports others crave. You expect more “Industry News, Tips, and Views Pros Can Use” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” ©
Again, our thanks to free email subscribers and all readers like you, as well as our tipsters/sources, sponsors and God for making and keeping us the runaway number one source for authentic “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (Affordable housing, manufactured homes, reports, fact-checks, analysis, and commentary. Third-party images or content are provided under fair use guidelines for media.) See Related Reports. Text/image boxes often are hot-linked to other reports that can be access by clicking on them.)
By L.A. “Tony” Kovach – for MHProNews.com.
Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing.
For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.
This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.
Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/latonykovach
