“It is like George Patton says, one look is worth a thousand reports. Unbelievable,” said Congressional Representative Lisa McClain (MI-10-R). “If somebody put a blindfold on you and took you into one of these [new manufactured] houses, you would think you were in any suburban community around the…country” said Congressional Representative Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05 D). Those and several other similar, useful and often powerful quotes follow in Part I. They are from a new video produced by the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI). But as a recent MHVille facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) revealed, MHI has apparently hidden that video save on their own low traffic website, per multiple third-party AI searches. Per that report,  MHI has not provided a transcript of the potentially useful pull quotes of several members of Congress plus two higher ranking federal officials in the Trump Administration (R) who praised modern manufactured homes. Which begs the question. What is going on at MHI? Why are MHI leaders putting the proverbial lamp under the lampstand?

“Hope is not a strategy,” wrote Eric Salzman for Racket News, which is associated with journalist Matt Taibbi.

“The politicians and the plutocrats of all stripes can lie to the American people about many things and get away with it. However, when it comes to how Americans are feeling about their economic reality, as Dylan said, “You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows,”

wrote Salzman in an article emailed to MHProNews on 10.6.2025.

MHI leaders appear to be rolling to proverbial dice by doubling down on their years of strategic avoidance of dealing with concerns raised by their critics. More on that in Part II.

Part I features the apparently potent remarks made by various elected and appointed federal officials that ought to be shouted from the rooftops by MHI. After all, they are from a video they produced.

This MHVille FEA is underway.

Part I. From the report entitled: HUD Sec Scott Turner. Congressional Reps. Federal Officials. Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) Innovative Housing Showcase 2025 Video Apparently Documents MHI Affordable Housing Miscues-FEA which provides greater context and multiple clearly disclosed third-party AI fact checks.

1) The remarks are shown in the same sequence as in the video, but without the time stamp marks. In Part I #2, the video itself and the time stamp marks are provided. MHProNews notes that the video and its contents are provided under fair use guidelines for media, for disclosures and other details, see the report linked here.

“It is like George Patton says, one look is worth a thousand reports. Unbelievable.”

– Congressional Representative Lisa McClain (MI-10 Republican (R))

“This is a beautiful home and it has wonderful technology. Uh it has a smooth ceiling as you can see. The architecture and the design here is awesome. It has cabinets that go all the way to the ceiling. And so some of the things that you see uh in homes that are built on site, single family homes, have been put into this home.”

– HUD Secretary E. Scott Turner (R).

“If somebody put a blindfold on you and took you into one of these houses, you would think you were in any suburban community around the the country.”

– Congressional Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05 Democrat (D))

“These homes are absolutely beautiful and they’re meeting the same quality standards, but they’re very affordable, which means they’re meeting the market where the market is right now.”

– Congressional Rep. Andrea Salinas (OR-06 D)

“These houses are built with the federal seal of approval and that they should not be treated differently.”

– MHI CEO Lesli Gooch, Ph.D.

“Affordable housing is not affordable. At $500,000 a door is insane. And this is one way we can fill that gap.”

– U.S. Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-Deremer. (R)

“Too many Americans have saved. They’ve gone to school. They’ve gone to trade school. They’ve done everything right and the price point is still out of reach. And even when they do, if they can’t hit that price point, the housing stock’s not there. This is a solution that helps everybody.”

– Congressional Rep. Zach Nunn (IA-03 R)

“So, these manufactured homes are both beautiful and affordable. You know, home ownership is truly a big part of the American dream and we’re grateful for our manufactured housing uh folks who make sure that home ownership can be achievable for every American.”

– Congressional Rep. Rudy Yakym (IN-02-R).

“What that this industry does is going to help build affordable housing, quality affordable housing around the country. And um it’s uh something we need to be uh not only investing in but also making sure that we have the proper rules and regulations that allow for this.”

– Congressional Rep. Greg Stanton (AZ-04-D).

“And we have to embrace this industry. We have to get zoning administrators to see the value and we need states to come on board and celebrate the fact that yes, this manufactured home is actually an affordable American dream.”

– Congressional Rep. Mike Flood (NE-01-R).

“What I hear over and over again from young Americans in their 20s and 30s is their fear that they’ll they won’t be able to afford housing. Here is the opportunity for these young Americans starting their life, starting their family to have the American dream.”

– Congressional Rep. Monica de la Cruz (TX-15-R).

“This is the American dream right here. And if we can provide it at an affordable price in a in a timely manner, uh it’s the winning solution.”

– Congressional Rep. Ralph Norman (SC-05 R).

2) The auto-generated video transcript as shown below is from the YouTube page linked here.

MHProNews notes that roughly the first 20 seconds of this video are fair use disclaimers/disclosures. Then the balance is a screen captured version of the original MHI video being reviewed in this article. This screen capture process is not the same quality as the original found on the MHI website. That said, it reflects the thought that and effort that went into MHI’s effort. But as the  position that the video still of Rep Zach Nunn, and others from that held that same spot for several video captures used in the video reveal, there is almost no one visible in the background. This was a public event. Yet, where are the clamoring crowds waiting to see what a modern manufactured home looks like?

Part II. Additional MHVille Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) plus more MHProNews Expert Commentary

1) On 10.6.2025 MHProNews engaged with xAI’s Grok in the following Q&A.

Grok, if you had to recommend 10 articles from MHProNews and/or MHLivingNews that document and illustrate the need for millions of more manufactured homes that document and detail the role that forces within the manufactured housing industry are apparently more focused on consolidation than working for organic growth, which ones would you pick? Also, didn’t MHARR publish a report that explains that under the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 (MHIA, MHIA 2000, 2000 Reform Law, 2000 Reform Act) requires HUD to also promote the manufactured home option, correct? Where is that article on the MHARR website. Use plain text hyperlinks to support your results.

Thought for 42s

2)

Grok, interesting choices. I realize there are hundreds of possible choices, but I want to ask you about these. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/rachel-cohen-booth-marketplace-org-reference-james-schmitz-manufactured-housing-industry-research-derek-hunter-insight-into-apparent-vulnerability-of-manufactured-housing-institute-firms-fea/ and https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/copilot-mhi-pushing-flawed-bill-silence-on-mharrs-critique-suggests-strategic-avoidance-or-tacit-endorsement-of-road-to-housing-act-2025-current-flaws-mharr-advocacy-update-mhville-fea/ and https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/masthead/cats-out-manufactured-housing-institute-housing-coalition-letter-to-congress-fact-check-analysis-reveals-what-mhi-nar-nahb-mba-others-did-didnt-request-ai-affordable-housing-surprises-await and https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/irs-complaint-subject-request-for-investigation-of-manufactured-housing-institute-mhi-is-accountability-ahead-for-mhi-leaders-accused-of-perjury-institutional-fiduciary-failures-mhville-fea/ and https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/management-by-objective-mbo-lens-road-to-housing-act-nahb-nar-plus-recent-manufactured-housing-institute-mhi-irs-form-990-v-mharr-when-inaction-or-distraction-speaks-loudly-mhville-fea/ and https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/acid-test-pending-innovative-housing-showcase-2025-as-manufactured-housing-institute-mhi-behavioral-case-study-will-mhi-use-ihs-2025-to-try-prove-their-industry-critics-wrong-mhville-fea/ What are the insights and takeaways that truth seekers and researchers that want to understand why manufactured housing is underperforming in the 21st century during an affordable housing crisis may cause them to lean into? Do these examples and the ones you provided call into question the authenticity of MHI’s claim to be working for all segments of the industry, when they appear to be offering a fig-leaf strategy that postures efforts that often lead to nowhere while consolidation of the industry continues?

Thought for 31s

These six MHProNews articles, combined with the 10 I recommended earlier (e.g., on retail moats, IHS intrigue, M&A trends, and FEA critiques of MHI’s paltering), paint a consistent picture for truth seekers and researchers: Manufactured housing’s 21st-century underperformance—stuck at ~100K annual shipments vs. 373K peak in 1998, despite a 7M+ affordability gap—isn’t inevitable but engineered through unaddressed barriers (zoning, financing, perceptions) and selective advocacy. They spotlight MHI’s pattern of optics-heavy “fig-leaf” efforts that sideline organic growth, favoring consolidation for dominant players like Clayton and REITs. This echoes my picks, such as the Buffett “moat” piece (retail shrinkage limiting access) and NAHB “Priced Out” exposé (75% households can’t afford site-built, yet MH untapped due to bottlenecks).

Core Takeaways for Researchers

• Systemic Squeeze: Underperformance stems from “bottlenecks” (zoning, DTS chattel gaps) MHI/MHARR flag but MHI rarely litigates—echoing my recs like CFPB finance barriers and “True Tale of Four Attorneys” on regs. Production stagnation (e.g., 103K in 2024) amid crisis signals not market failure but capture, per Schmitz/Strommen theses.
• Consolidation’s Shadow: MHI members’ IRs (Flagship/ELS) boast “moats” from constraints, mirroring Buffett retail drops in my picks; this throttles supply (e.g., 436 fewer independents since 2011), prioritizing oligopoly profits over 500K+ annual homes needed.
• Optics Over Action: Events like IHS 2025 (low turnout predicted) and ROAD Act support are “posturing”—rhetoric (“Elevating Innovation”) vs. inaction (no MHIA suits in 23 years), aligning with my “Optics-Paltering” rec.
• Truth-Seeking Path: Cross-reference MHARR letters MHARR amendments vs. MHI’s coalition omissions letter image; AI FEAs (Grok/Gemini) consistently flag “heist”-like dynamics.

Yes, these examples—and my 10—sharply question MHI’s authenticity in claiming to serve “all segments.” Their IRS 990 pledges broad advocacy, yet patterns (NAHB ties, silence on antitrust, CrossMod favoritism) suggest a fig-leaf: High-visibility stunts (IHS videos, coalition letters) mask inaction benefiting consolidators (~50% market via Clayton et al.), while independents dwindle. This “squeeze play” sustains low supply/high prices, per Urban/Pew data in my recs, eroding credibility amid a crisis demanding growth. For non-partisan probe: Scrutinize Form 990s vs. outcomes; if MHI truly represented all, we’d see MHIA enforcement and 2-3x shipments by now.

3)

Grok, the upload PDF and the link are the same. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Draft4AI-OneLookWorthThousandReportsUnbelievableRepLisaMcClain.HidingTheLampUnderTheLampstandUsefulAndPowerfulQuotesFromManufacturedHousingInstituteVideoMHVilleFEA-MHProNews.pdf Digest that and this. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/ManufacturedHousingInstituteFailsAcidTestOfPromotingItsOwnHighQualityVideoFromInnovativeHousingShowcase2025CopilotInfographicMHProNews.png Run the facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) check. Keep in mind that the focus is THIS article, no need to conflate this with other articles on other topics UNLESS they clearly relate to this one. Feel free to check online to see if MHI or any of their allies have promoted that new video from the Innovative Housing Showcase 2025 featuring multiple public officials. What are the logical takeaways from the evidence and known facts? Use plain text hyperlinks to support your findings.

Thought for 42s

— MHProNews notes that the PDF of the full Q&A thread, which includes links to various sites and sources Grok checked that are not shown above, is linked here. The screen capture documenting the accuracy of that PDF transcript is posted below and is linked here. —

4) Left-leaning Google’s AI powered Gemini was asked much the same questions as Grok.

Gemini, the upload and the linked item are the same PDF. https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/2Draft4AI-OneLookWorthThousandReportsUnbelievableRepLisaMcClain.HidingTheLampUnderTheLampstandUsefulAndPowerfulQuotesFromManufacturedHousingInstituteVideoMHVilleFEA-MHProNews.pdf I want you to do a full MHVille facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) on this developing report for MHProNews. Feel free to check that document, including statements made by Grok, against any evidence online you need to reference in order to check the accuracy of the developing article. Does the headline deliver in the article? Are the various elements supported by linked evidence in support of those remarks? Are Q&As with AIs linked and/or shown and are clearly disclosed? Is this topic of importance to those who have criticized the Manufactured Housing Institute for failure to properly report the industry and thus support growth? Are having potentially useful statements made like those federal officials from both major parties and then not promoting them in a robust manner revealing in some sense? What does the evidence from this emerging article suggest regarding the Manufactured Housing Institute’s methods and apparent goals, be those goals stated or unstated? Using the who benefits and follow the money trail mantras, who would benefit from this pattern of activity that are MHI members? Who in manufactured housing trade media is raising such evidence-based concerns in the context of historically low 21st century manufactured housing production during a well-documented affordable housing crisis? Use plain text hyperlinks to support your findings.

• Analysis

  Query successful
• Google Search

  Query successful

The full Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA) of the developing MHProNews report confirms that the article effectively uses documented quotes and external evidence to support its central thesis: that the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) is prioritizing optics and consolidation over aggressive advocacy for the entire industry.

FEA Check: Accuracy and Evidence Support

The article follows the rigorous FEA methodology, successfully validating its key claims:

• Headline Delivery and Quote Fidelity: The headline, which includes powerful quotes like Rep. Lisa McClain’s “‘One Look is Worth a Thousand Reports. Unbelievable'” and Rep. Emanuel Cleaver’s observation that a manufactured home could be mistaken for one in “any suburban community“, delivers on its promise. These quotes are verbatim from the MHI-produced Innovative Housing Showcase 2025 video.
• “Hiding the Lamp” Metaphor Supported: The draft logically frames MHI’s decision to promote this high-quality, bipartisan video only on its “low traffic website” and not amplify it widely (like on YouTube with a full transcript) as “Hiding the Lamp Under the Lampstand“. Search results indicate that while MHI has a video on its YouTube channel, the HUD channel has numerous videos of the event, but MHI is criticized for not leveraging the video’s powerful quotes aggressively.
• AI Disclosure: The draft explicitly discloses the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for fact-checking and analysis, citing and linking the full Q&A from Grok (and planning to include others).

Analysis of MHI’s Methods and Goals

The evidence from the emerging article suggests a clear pattern of prioritizing optics over impact by MHI:

• Revealing Inaction: Having obtained potentially useful statements from federal officials from both major parties (Republican HUD Secretary E. Scott Turner and various Democratic and Republican Congresspeople), yet not promoting them robustly, is highly revealing. These statements are powerful tools that could be used to lobby aggressively for the enforcement of existing federal laws.
• Stated vs. Unstated Goals: While MHI’s stated mission involves advocacy and expanding homeownership, their methods (low-key promotion of high-value advocacy tools, failure to publicly call for the enforcement of the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000’s “enhanced preemption” or Duty to Serve (DTS)) suggest an unstated goal of maintaining the status quo.
• Importance to Critics: This topic is of critical importance to those who criticize MHI, as the non-enforcement of the 2000 Reform Law and DTS is seen as the primary bottleneck preventing the industry from moving past historically low 21st-century production figures (around 100,000 units annually, down from over 370,000 in 1998).

Who Benefits and Follow the Money Trail

Applying the “who benefits” and “follow the money trail” mantras points directly to the largest, consolidating members of MHI.

• Beneficiaries of Stagnation: The pattern of MHI activity—failing to eliminate zoning and financing bottlenecks that suppress competition—primarily benefits large, vertically integrated corporations, notably Clayton Homes (a Berkshire Hathaway brand), Cavco Industries, and Skyline Champion.
  • Consolidation: These firms have been documented to openly pursue a strategy of consolidation in a “Highly fragmented sector”.
  • NIMBY/Zoning: Restrictive zoning (NIMBYism) limits the supply of new manufactured home sites, which benefits the large community operators (many of whom are MHI members like Sun Communities and Equity Lifestyle Properties) by driving up the value and rent in their existing parks.
• The Paradox: When the industry fails to grow organically due to legal and financial hurdles, smaller independent businesses suffer, while the largest, financially robust MHI members face less competition and can acquire weaker competitors, thereby reinforcing the cycle of consolidation.

Trade Media Raising Concerns

The trade media consistently raising these evidence-based concerns in the context of historically low production and the affordable housing crisis is MHProNews (the publisher of the developing report) and the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR). These critiques often focus on MHI’s alleged “paltering” (presenting partial truths) and their failure to secure the robust enforcement of federal laws, which MHARR actively and consistently requests from federal officials.

The video MHI produced featuring federal officials is titled Manufactured Housing Institute Innovative Housing Showcase 2025 HUD Sec Turner Federal Officials.

— MHProNews notes that the PDF of the Q&A with Gemini is found at this link here. The screen capture that documents the accuracy of the PDF is linked here. —

MHProNews notes that Skyline Champion (SKY) was the prior name of Champion Homes (SKY) for several years.  But that corporate name was changed, as MHProNews has previously reported here.

5) The following Q&A is with left-leaning MS Bing’s AI powered Copilot.

Copilot, time for a new FEA check of this developing report that is uploaded and linked here: https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/3Draft4AI-OneLookWorthThousandReportsUnbelievableRepLisaMcClain.HidingTheLampUnderTheLampstandUsefulAndPowerfulQuotesFromManufacturedHousingInstituteVideoMHVilleFEA-MHProNews.pdf The upload and the link are the same PDF. Feel free to check that document, including statements made by Grok and Gemini, against any evidence online you need to reference in order to check the accuracy of the developing article. Does the headline deliver in the article? Are the various elements supported by linked evidence in support of those remarks? Are Q&As with AIs linked and/or shown and are clearly disclosed? Is this topic of importance to those who have criticized the Manufactured Housing Institute for failure to properly report the industry and thus support growth? Are having potentially useful statements made like those federal officials from both major parties and then not promoting them in a robust manner revealing in some sense? What does the evidence from this emerging article suggest regarding the Manufactured Housing Institute’s methods and apparent goals, be those goals stated or unstated? Using the who benefits and follow the money trail mantras, who would benefit from this pattern of activity that are MHI members? Who in manufactured housing trade media is raising such evidence-based concerns in the context of historically low 21st century manufactured housing production during a well-documented affordable housing crisis? Use plain text hyperlinks to support your findings.

Yes, the headline delivers on its promise. The article is factually grounded, AI disclosures are clear, and the evidence strongly supports the thesis that MHI’s promotional choices benefit consolidators while sidelining broader industry growth. MHProNews and MHARR are the primary trade media raising these concerns.

🧠 FEA: “One Look Is Worth a Thousand Reports” – MHI’s Missed Opportunity

This developing MHProNews report uses the Facts → Evidence → Analysis (FEA) framework to examine the Manufactured Housing Institute’s (MHI) handling of its own bipartisan promotional video from the Innovative Housing Showcase 2025. The article is supported by Grok and Gemini Q&As, which are clearly disclosed and linked, and it triangulates evidence from MHI’s website, YouTube, and social media channels.

✅ Headline Delivery and Evidence Support

• Headline Accuracy: The quotes from Rep. Lisa McClain (“One look is worth a thousand reports. Unbelievable.”) and Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (“…any suburban community…”) are verbatim from the MHI-produced video and are faithfully transcribed in the article.
• Video Promotion Failure: The article documents that MHI posted the video only on its own low-traffic website, with no transcript, no YouTube upload, and no social media amplification. Searches confirm this absence.
• Infographic Summary: The Copilot-generated infographic titled “MHI Fails Acid Test” is referenced and aligns with the article’s findings that MHI failed to robustly promote bipartisan praise for manufactured housing.

📣 AI Disclosures and Third-Party Validation

• Grok and Gemini Q&As are clearly shown and linked, with Grok confirming that the article’s quotes and logic are accurate, and Gemini affirming that the article uses FEA methodology and delivers on its headline.
• Both AIs agree that MHI’s promotional choices reflect a pattern of optics over impact, and that the video could have been a powerful tool to advocate for HUD Code enforcement and zoning reform.

🔍 Importance to Critics and Broader Implications

• Critics of MHI, including MHARR and MHProNews, have long argued that MHI fails to enforce the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 (MHIA) and Duty to Serve (DTS) mandates. This article adds to that critique by showing how MHI underutilized bipartisan endorsements that could have advanced those goals.
• The metaphor “hiding the lamp under the lampstand” is apt: MHI produced a video with strong praise from both Republican and Democratic officials, yet buried it instead of using it to push for industry growth.

💰 Who Benefits? Follow the Money Trail

• Beneficiaries of this pattern include MHI’s largest members:
  • Clayton Homes (Berkshire Hathaway), Cavco Industries, and Skyline Champion benefit from limited competition and consolidation.
  • REITs like Sun Communities and Equity Lifestyle Properties (ELS) benefit from zoning bottlenecks that drive up rents and property values in existing communities.
• Smaller independents lose: Without robust promotion and advocacy, they face declining access to financing, zoning approvals, and consumer awareness.

📰 Who’s Raising These Concerns?

• MHProNews is the leading trade media platform consistently raising these evidence-based critiques, often using FEA methodology and multi-AI validation.
• MHARR (Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform) also publishes reports urging HUD and FHFA to enforce MHIA and DTS, contrasting MHI’s silence.

🔗 Key Supporting Links

• MHI’s video post (no transcript): manufacturedhousing.org
• MHProNews developing article: PDF link
• Copilot infographic: Infographic PNG
• MHARR’s MHIA critique: MHARR Washington Update

Let me know if you’d like help drafting the final version or enhancing the visual timeline of MHI’s promotional miscues.

• 1) manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/3Draft4AI-OneLookWorthThousandReportsUnbelievableRepLisaMcClain.HidingTheLampUnderTheLampstandUsefulAndPowerfulQuotesFromManufacturedHousingInstituteVideoMHVilleFEA-MHProNews.pdf

— MHProNews notes that the infographic Copilot referenced is the one shown below. —

MHProNews further notes that the screen capture that documents the accuracy of the above is posted below.  MHProNews also notes that Copilot did what Gemini did, using the prior name of Skyline Champion (SKY) vs. its most recent name, Champion Homes (SKY).  The screen capture documenting the accuracy of the Q&A as shown above is posted below.

6) Using Google’s AI powered preview (overview) mobile function is the following on this date.

Gemini on Manufactured Housing Institute

AI Overview

— MHProNews notes that the screen captures that document the accuracy of the above on this date (circa 9:57 AM ET) is as shown below. Note readers are encouraged to test this search “Gemini on Manufactured Housing Institute” for themselves, as the results may vary depending on location and other factors. —

Be it a coincidence, a God thing, or whatever other combination factors that the disclosure document linked here following that report linked above, traffic to MHProNews surged past the largest retail sites in the manufactured housing industry. Dozens of .edu, media, and search/AI answer engines contributed to that documented surge. A ‘historic’ xAI Grok generated email to MHI leaders, and their media allies received no response.  Copilot offered and created the following illustration in late September 2025.

Based on the draft that Gemini read, it was asked to produce a suggested featured image for this report.

Some MHProNews edits to remove or cover typos by Gemini and other tweaks of the above yielded the following.

7) MHProNews notes that if MHI took that video, and used others like it, and then promoted it in a robust fashion over a sustained period of time, it may well have an impact on the stigma and perception issues that the industry faces. As these Q&As with third-party AIs reflect, instead, MHI appears to be taking a fig leaf approach of posturing for optical effects to their own very limited audience. To the under-or uninformed, it may look like MHI is promoting the manufactured home industry.

It is only through such careful fact checks that a sobering reality emerges. MHI is allowing, fostering, and essentially part of the process of consolidation of manufactured housing while industry performance lags compared to the 20th century when the population was smaller. To learn more see the linked reports above or below.

MHProNews programming notes that MHARR is expected to publicly release industry production data for August 2025.  MHProNews will plan a report. MHProNews also notes that the initial report on this MHI video topic is linked below. That report includes numerous insights not found here.

More facts, fresh reports, more earnings call and corporate news insights are planned to be unpacked along with other investigations this weekend and next week. Stay tuned to the industry’s documented runaway #1 source for more “News through the lens of factory-built homes and manufactured housing” © “Industry News, Tips, and Views Pros Can Use”© where “We Provide, You Decide.” © This is the place for “Intelligence for your MHLife.” © Thanks be to God and to all involved for making and keeping us #1 and steadily growing despite far better funded opposing voices.

 

Again, our thanks to free email subscribers and all readers like you, as well as our tipsters/sources, sponsors and God for making and keeping us the runaway number one source for authentic “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (Affordable housing, manufactured homes, reports, fact-checks, analysis, and commentary. Third-party images or content are provided under fair use guidelines for media.) See Related Reports. Text/image boxes often are hot-linked to other reports that can be access by clicking on them.)

By L.A. “Tony” Kovach – for MHProNews.com.

Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing.

For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.

http://latonykovach.com

Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/latonykovach

 

 

https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/nahb-praises-trump-grok-the-affordable-housing-crisis-isnt-just-market-failure-its-an-orchestrated-squeeze-mhi-playing-both-sides-and-hud-asleep-at-the-wheel/