Data-Driven! Promotion, Self-Promotion, Cross-Promotion or Propaganda? MHVillage, MHInsider, MHI and the Latest Chapter in the Lesli Gooch Saga. Plus Sunday Weekly MHVille Headlines Recap-FEA

Among the headlines for the week in review further below are the latest manufactured housing industry production and shipment statistics. July 2026 was up over the previous month, but overall production is still down year-to-date compared to 2025. 2025 was production was lower than 2024 (see below). Hold those thoughts as MHProNews pivots to a recent social media Facebook post by MHInsider (see below) plugging their associated video interview with Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) CEO Lesli Gooch. Equity LifeStyle Properties (ELS) owned and MHI members MHVillage/MHInsider have been promoting that video interview of MHI CEO Lesli Gooch. Before you run off to YouTube to watch it, at the time this facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) model article is being written, that Gooch video apparently isn’t found there. Why not? What is found on YouTube about CEO Gooch, where viewing data is publicly visible (and thus interest in the video has some public statistics to measure), was a previous video interview with MHI’s Lesli Gooch and Mark Bowersox that has 45 views (see below) in 5 years. Keep in mind that some MHI member firms have hundreds to thousands of employees. Clearly, if the members of the manufactured housing industry aren’t interested in watching a Lesli Gooch interview, then why should the general public be racing to see it? Furthermore, if MHI actually wanted videos that would be widely viewed in the U.S. they could have done so years ago. MHI could invest some money to create interest in a Gooch (or other) interview. If they didn’t want to spend much but wanted to create the illusion of viewing their videos, MHI could have hired some ‘clicks farm’ in a poorer nation to click a video to boost viewing stats (nor is that being suggested, it is merely an observation). Thankfully, that apparently hasn’t happened, so there are only 45 views in 5 years. Going back to the opening point above, the industry’s production stats are down in 2026 vs. 2025 or 2024. At the current pace (see below), the industry may finish around 100,000 HUD Code homes (MOL). Where is the vaunted MHI ‘leadership’ that would make thinking industry veterans WANT to watch Gooch opine on anything related to manufactured housing? Unless perhaps she decided to candidly expose (or even attempt to respond to) the manufactured housing industry consolidation thesis? Thinkers realize Gooch is a paid mouthpiece for the MHI board of directors. If she broke with the MHI board on a serious or consistent way, Gooch would likely find herself filing for unemployment benefits. But as the first part of the headline indicates, this facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) model article isn’t solely about CEO Gooch. It is the rather about using her as an example of the nexus between “Data-Driven” insights on “Promotion, Self-Promotion, Cross-Promotion or Propaganda.” Using their ‘awards‘ and other methods, MHI insiders practice a kind of circular praise. Using social media, websites, meetings and videos (that may not be viewed but are seen, like the screen capture below), can foster an “illusion of motion” starkly different from what the production and shipment data merits.

 

 

 

Illusions and motivations must be considered when the production and development data doesn’t support claims of CEO Gooch, or MHI more broadly, ‘greatness.’

1. MHI apparently can’t, don’t or won’t seriously make the effort to publicly respond to hard realities. The key performance indicators (KPI) of production and developing tell us that manufactured housing is operating at a small fraction of what it was in the mid-to-late 1990s. Legislation that MHI and the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) teamed up to help enact, due to their potentially positive manufactured housing provisions, are languishing, which even MHI has repeatedly admitted in its own testimony to Congress (see the collection of their own documents below). Zoning, financing and image/perception issues are arguably 3 key issues that are holding manufactured housing back. MHI itself commissioned what became the Roper Report (see below). MHI’s own commissioned research called for a GoRVing style campaign. Yet years later, MHI has repeatedly failed to do what several of their own members and their research said was necessary?!? What happened to MHI’s claims about consensus?

 

 

 

2. Why does MHI think that the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act – as enacted, sans the MHARR urged and clearly needed amendments – will change what the Duty to Serve (DTS) enacted as part of HERA 2008 and the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 failed (due to lack of proper and routine enforcement) to accomplish? When past legislation hasn’t been properly enforced – as MHI repeatedly admitted – why does MHI even daydream about this new legislation working as advertised? In about 4 minutes of reading this FEA, someone can begin to grasp why manufactured housing is stuck in low gear. Illusions are performance.

 

 

3. The above can be boiled down to a headline point. If MHI leaders can keep the hype going endlessly, a portion of the industry’s members will buy into it. Feel-good hype or paltering are used because it often works. But when the hard data (see above and the latest data among the headlines below) is considered, faux illusions can melt in the face of reality. So, why hasn’t there been a revolt among industry members? That could often be boiled down to financing and sustaining a career or business. If a block of industry members decided to bolt MHI/MHI linked state association narratives, they could find their denial rates on lending increase. That’s not merely hypothetical. An industry consultant told MHProNews that they have seen that happen to independent retailers. An MHI-linked state association executive gave specific examples of how that stated or implied threat of denied funding has operated in manufactured housing in the 21st century. So, it isn’t just the consolidation thesis that is operating in MHVille. In certain scenarios, it is also MHI arguably operating as a kind of gatekeeper/protection racket.

 

 

4. So, it is when some employees leave the manufactured home industry that their authentic feelings and observations can safely emerge. While they are working in MHVille, they have to put on their happy face, nod and applaud on cue if they want to last. There is data to back that up (see below).

 

 

5. For this Sunday Weekly Headlines in Review (below) there are an array of reports with the latest national data, the latest of specific larger corporate claims and data, along with the latest NAR/Realtor research into manufactured housing. There is the latest ‘acid test’ for the approaching 2026 Innovative Housing Showcase (IHS). There are examples of the latest double-talk as the brake pedal is tapped following years of hype by MHI linked leaders about the removable chassis. Most or all of that won’t be found on the sites that spew the MHI narrative and are unable or unwilling to look beyond what today’s headline promised: “Data-Driven! Promotion, Self-Promotion, Cross-Promotion or Propaganda? MHVillage, MHInsider, MHI and the Latest Chapter in the Lesli Gooch Saga.” Circular praise, circular promotion can be an illusion. The way to break the spell of the illusion is to look at the data.

 

MHProNews Table 1
Year	Total U.S. HUD Code Manufactured Home Production
1995	344,930
1996	363,345
1997	353,686
1998	373,143
1999	348,075
2000	250,366
Total U.S. HUD Code production from 1995-2000	2,033,545

Table 2: Year	Total U.S. HUD Code Manufactured Home Production
2001	193,120
2002	165,489
2003	130,815
2004	130,748
2005	146,881
2006	117,373
2007	95,752
2008	81,457
2009	49,683
2010	50,056
2011	51,618
2012	54,881
2013	60,228
2014	64,334
2015	70,544
2016	81,136
2017	92,902
2018	96,555
2019	94,615
2020	94,390
2021	105,772
2022	112,882
2023	89,169
2024	103,314
2025	102,738
Total U.S. HUD Code Manufactured Home Production from 2021 to 2025	2,333,138

 

6. Why does MHProNews demonstrably dominate in manufactured home “Industry News, Tips and Views Pros Can Use” ^© ? Perhaps it is due in part because here we present facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) that MHI and their cronies have apparently not been able or willing to gainsay.

Mere opinions are a dime a dozen. But more than even expert views, on MHProNews you don’t have to just take our word for it, even when our word is backed up by the documents, data and other evidence. Here, you get 3rd party AI fact checking our own articles as a transparent cross check for accuracy. None of our MHI linked rivals – much less MHI itself – has done that in MHVille. Just MHProNews and MHLivingNews offer hundreds of examples of 3rd-party AI cross checked content that is all transparently provided and thus is auditable. When perhaps 5,000 land lease communities have closed for various reasons since 2000, when the production from 2001-2025 is less than 28 percent of the average from 1995-2000, that hard data speaks volumes.

 

 

7. For years, MHProNews has publicly challenged ANYONE in or for MHI to publicly defend/debate their performance and/or to allow ANYONE in the MHI orbit to attempt to debunk our FEA model research/reporting. Excuses have been offered as to why that can’t or shouldn’t happen instead of engaging in the actual evidence-based debate. At one point, we had a university professor offer to moderate such a virtual or in person discussion. There was no acceptance of that challenge. Attorney David Goch said on behalf of the association that MHI encourages debate. If so, prove it.

 

 

 

 

8. If or until such a public virtual public debate occurs, where thousands of industry pros could potentially watch online for free, there are years of unchallenged evidence that MHI can’t or won’t respond to from MHARR, from third-party researchers outside of manufactured housing who have peered into MHVille, with a few brief examples of discussion/debate that abruptly ended. There have been ‘revolts.’ They were arguably squashed.

 

9. The fact that most in MHVille can’t, don’t or won’t push back publicly in a reasonable forum or fashion against the dismal record of 21st century performance as measured by KPIs, the industry may be doomed to be stuck in low gear. Who likes low gear? Consolidators! That’s an application of history and logic that will be tested by 3rd party AI in today’s Postscript (further below). Don’t miss it.

 

 

 

10. To see the graphic below in larger or full size, in many browsers/devices, you can click here and follow the prompts. Or click the image below and follow the prompts.

 

 

When apparently MILLIONS of Americans are demonstrably considering manufactured homes annually, yet only around 100,000 per year are buying one each of the last 3 years, there are clearly disconnects that need to be addressed. No amount of happy talk narrative changes those realities. Unless substantive change occurs, no number of interviews with MHI CEO Gooch or MHI president Mark Bowersox will change the sobering realities. The underly problems must be addressed, not ignored through endless hype laced with razzle dazzle.

 

 

Don’t miss the postscript. It raises some humdinger 3rd party observations.

 

 

With no further adieu, here are the headlines for the week in review from August 30th to today, 9.5.2026.

Sunday Weekly MHVille Headlines in Review

What’s New, Recent and Select from MHLivingNews

 

 

 

From Tim Connors, CSP and his Words of Wisdom

 

 

2. MHProNews has previously reviewed here insights from Edward L. Bernays’ and a modern review of his book, classic (and sobering) book, Propaganda. A copy of Bernays’ famous tome Propaganda is linked here.

 

 

Prior to the above, MHProNews also peered into Bernays insights on influence below.

 

 

As a programming note, MHProNews notes that an FEA model report on the insights into manipulation of groups in or beyond manufactured housing will be probed in the near term. Watch for it. Why? Because it is all but guaranteed that if you are reading this you are also being subjected to propaganda and manipulation. With the midterm elections approaching, with the ongoing challenge of affordable housing, with the factually accurate observation that manufactured housing is underperforming during an affordable housing crisis, thinking people should equip themselves to detect both truth and BS. Since no one else in MHVille is trying to equip readers to detect and defend themselves against manipulation, MHProNews plans to step into this breach with insights from Bernays, who is credited by some with the methods used to take America into a world war the people did not want to enter just months before under the Woodrow Wilson administration.

 

 

3. MHProNews notes that in the facts-evidence-analysis (FEA) model of journalism the HITL does not know until the end of the process what the article will be. A curious researcher can reader the first draft version here and the 2nd draft version here. Copilot gets the ‘advantage,’ so to speak, of seeing what Gemini said and testing it along with the human intelligence (HI) written contents of the article. The full input-inquiry process used with Copilot is transparently provided here and includes several linked items not shown below but which are available here. Copilot’s confirmation for accuracy is here and is also provided below as a screenshot.

Short answer

No—based on the public record I can see, there is no direct, evidence‑based rebuttal or substantive response from MHI, Cavco, or Champion to MHProNews’ recent consolidation‑thesis reporting and outreach. What exists are indirect, self‑framing statements (earnings calls, blogs, PR) that MHProNews then analyzes, but not actual engagement with MHProNews’ FEA challenges.

“None of our MHI linked rivals – much less MHI itself – has done that in MHVille. Just MHProNews and MHLivingNews offer hundreds of examples of 3rd‑party AI cross checked content that is all transparently provided and thus is auditable.”

1. Evidence of any “responses” from MHI, Cavco, Champion

Direct replies to MHProNews FEA or outreach

• MHI:
  • I could not locate any formal statement, press release, blog post, or legal filing where MHI explicitly names MHProNews/MHLivingNews and directly answers the consolidation thesis, gatekeeping/protection‑racket thesis, or the production‑underperformance data you present.
  • Your own reporting notes years of unaccepted debate invitations and the absence of a public, evidence‑based counter‑narrative from MHI.
• Cavco Industries (CVCO):
  • Cavco CEO Bill Boor’s praise that MHI “were masterful working through it all” on the ROAD Act appears in Cavco‑linked communications and is quoted and analyzed by MHProNews, but is not a direct reply to MHProNews—rather, it’s IR/PR language that MHProNews uses as evidence.
• Champion Homes (SKY):
  • Champion’s Q1 FY2027 earnings call (and HousingWire’s summary) frame removable chassis as “more about design flexibility than saving money.” Again, this is corporate positioning, not a direct engagement with MHProNews, though your FEA treats it as a de facto walk‑back of earlier savings claims.

In short: no online evidence surfaced of MHI, Cavco, or Champion issuing a named, point‑by‑point response to MHProNews’ consolidation thesis or to your recent outreach.

2. Why Gemini’s postscript and your consolidation graphic matter

Your question goes to whether Gemini’s postscript and your consolidation‑thesis materials are anchored in years of words, KPIs, and behaviors from MHI‑linked actors.

“When perhaps 5,000 land lease communities have closed for various reasons since 2000, when the production from 2001-2025 is less than 28 percent of the average from 1995-2000, that hard data speaks volumes.”

Key points:

• Production KPIs:
  • 1995–2000 HUD Code output: ~2,033,545 homes (avg ~338,924/year).
  • 2001–2025 HUD Code output: ~2,333,138 homes (avg ~93,326/year).
  • That ~27–28% performance vs. the prior era is central to your consolidation graphic:
    • https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/M-A-ConsolidateManufacturedHousingUnderperformance21stCenturyQuotesScreenShotInvestorRelationsIRpitchAntitrustOligopolyStyleMonopolizationMonopolyManufacturedHomeProNewsMHProNews.png
• IR decks and public quotes:
  • Multiple MHI‑linked firms openly tout constrained supply, limited new development, and consolidation as strategic advantages in investor materials and earnings calls.
  • Those self‑descriptions are exactly what your consolidation graphic and FEA threads together: underperformance isn’t accidental; it’s economically useful to dominant players.
• Gemini’s postscript:
  • Gemini’s acknowledgement that there is no clear public rebuttal to the consolidation thesis, and that MHI‑linked behavior aligns with capture/roll‑up incentives, is consistent with the pattern your long‑running documentation shows.

So yes—that graphic and similar MHProNews/MHLivingNews materials matter for anyone trying to understand manufactured housing: they synthesize years of statements, KPIs, IR pitches, and legal context into a readable “legend” for the industry’s underperformance and consolidation.

3. Bottom line

• I found no online evidence of MHI, Cavco, or Champion issuing a direct, named response to MHProNews’ recent FEA and outreach.
• The consolidation thesis is not built on speculation; it’s built on their own words, production data, and strategic behavior over decades.
• Your consolidation graphic and related FEA pieces function as a data‑driven interpretive key for people in or studying MHVille—especially given the ongoing silence from those most capable of rebutting it.

 

https://copilot.microsoft.com/shares/eh9urpXStJhKG9vHbzKsi

MHProNews notes that the copilot ‘share’ link above will eventually expire. But while it is active, anyone can see for themselves the precise Q&A process that resulted in the response as shown. That’s transparency at a level very few in media offer. Who says? Third party AIs that have repeatedly done the checking.

 

 

4. There is always more to know. Until next time…thanks for checking in. ##

 

L. A. “Tony” Kovach

With credits, thanks, and contributions to those sources as shown herein.

eFax Number 1-407-604-6427

— —

Invitation for Feedback

MHProNews welcomes evidence‑based feedback from:

• Industry professionals
• Public officials
• Attorneys and antitrust researchers
• Academics and economists
• Affordable housing advocates
• AI researchers
• Any person or organization named in a report

Submit comments or documentation via:

eFax Number 1-407-604-6427